Information asymmetry, agency costs, and payout policies: An international analysis of IFRS adoption and the global financial crisis

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101129
Wolfgang Bessler , Halit Gonenc , Mario Hernandez Tinoco
{"title":"Information asymmetry, agency costs, and payout policies: An international analysis of IFRS adoption and the global financial crisis","authors":"Wolfgang Bessler ,&nbsp;Halit Gonenc ,&nbsp;Mario Hernandez Tinoco","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information asymmetry can affect the propensity of firms to pay dividends directly and indirectly by reducing the agency costs of free cash flow (FCF). However, designing a research framework to identify whether information asymmetry or agency cost directly explains the propensity to pay dividends is challenging, as both are partially endogenous. To overcome this challenge, this study investigates the role of two independent external shocks in explaining the propensity of firms to pay dividends. We use the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as an information asymmetry–reducing event and the global financial crisis (GFC) as an agency cost–reducing event to disentangle the effects of information asymmetry and agency costs. Using a large international sample of more than 100,000 firm-year observations and a matched sample of more than 35,000 observations, we find that the propensity to pay dividends declined after the mandatory adoption of IFRS and then declined further due to the economic shock of the GFC. We also provide evidence that firms facing high information asymmetry and high agency costs have a lower propensity to pay dividends because of the combined effects of IFRS adoption and the GFC. These findings suggest that the agency costs of FCF are more directly relevant in explaining dividend payout policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 101129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000638/pdfft?md5=0e84716d6da0e7d5493405ee5ce41899&pid=1-s2.0-S0939362523000638-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Information asymmetry can affect the propensity of firms to pay dividends directly and indirectly by reducing the agency costs of free cash flow (FCF). However, designing a research framework to identify whether information asymmetry or agency cost directly explains the propensity to pay dividends is challenging, as both are partially endogenous. To overcome this challenge, this study investigates the role of two independent external shocks in explaining the propensity of firms to pay dividends. We use the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as an information asymmetry–reducing event and the global financial crisis (GFC) as an agency cost–reducing event to disentangle the effects of information asymmetry and agency costs. Using a large international sample of more than 100,000 firm-year observations and a matched sample of more than 35,000 observations, we find that the propensity to pay dividends declined after the mandatory adoption of IFRS and then declined further due to the economic shock of the GFC. We also provide evidence that firms facing high information asymmetry and high agency costs have a lower propensity to pay dividends because of the combined effects of IFRS adoption and the GFC. These findings suggest that the agency costs of FCF are more directly relevant in explaining dividend payout policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息不对称、代理成本和支付政策:采用国际财务报告准则与全球金融危机的国际分析
信息不对称会通过降低自由现金流(FCF)的代理成本直接或间接地影响企业支付股利的倾向。然而,设计一个研究框架来确定是信息不对称还是代理成本直接解释了支付股利的倾向是具有挑战性的,因为两者都是部分内生的。为了克服这一挑战,本研究调查了两个独立的外部冲击在解释公司支付股利倾向方面的作用。我们将强制采用《国际财务报告准则》(IFRS)作为减少信息不对称的事件,将全球金融危机(GFC)作为减少代理成本的事件,以区分信息不对称和代理成本的影响。通过使用一个包含 10 万多个公司年度观测数据的大型国际样本和一个包含 3.5 万多个观测数据的匹配样本,我们发现,在强制采用《国际财务报告准则》之后,支付股息的倾向有所下降,随后由于全球金融危机的经济冲击,支付股息的倾向进一步下降。我们还提供证据表明,在采用《国际财务报告准则》和全球金融危机的共同影响下,面临高信息不对称和高代理成本的企业支付股息的倾向较低。这些研究结果表明,FCF 的代理成本在解释股利支付政策方面具有更直接的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comovement and Global Imbalances of Current Accounts Demographic transition and inflation The impact of the heterogenous fiscal policy stance of euro-area member states on ECB monetary policy Environmental protection taxes and green productivity: Evidence from listed companies in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1