Geomorphic response of a mountain gravel-bed river to an extreme flood in Aberdeenshire, Scotland

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOLOGY Scottish Journal of Geology Pub Date : 2020-02-11 DOI:10.1144/sjg2019-005
Dina M. Fieman, Mikael Attal, S. Addy
{"title":"Geomorphic response of a mountain gravel-bed river to an extreme flood in Aberdeenshire, Scotland","authors":"Dina M. Fieman, Mikael Attal, S. Addy","doi":"10.1144/sjg2019-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses the 2015 ‘Storm Frank’ flood on the River Dee, Aberdeenshire, to assess the impact of extreme events on river dynamics. The Storm Frank flood (>200 year recurrence interval) caused significant local morphological change that was concentrated in the middle portion of the 140 km long river and overall net degradation that primarily occurred through lateral adjustment processes. Although the flood did not cause widespread change in channel planform, morphological change at the reach scale (<1 km) was significant. Bank scour resulted in channel expansion and lateral migration as well as widespread aggradation on existing gravel beds. The HEC-RAS and CAESAR–Lisflood models were used to determine the impact of morphological changes from the Storm Frank flood on a series of future hypothetical floods. The results show that inundation is highly influenced by the degree of morphological change for moderate floods, but not for high magnitude ones. In-channel scour and bank erosion can lead to an increase in channel capacity, thereby decreasing inundation. Conversely, where conveyance capacity is decreased by aggradation, flood risk inherently increases. The impact of these changes was great for a five-year return period flood, but minimal for a magnitude flood comparable to that of Storm Frank. Our modelling results also reveal that the inundation model is sensitive to the grain size and channel bed roughness input parameters, as these parameters impact flow discharge and flood hydraulics. Accurate determination of sediment parameters and degree of morphological change is therefore critical in flooding modelling and flood hazard management. Supplementary material: Peak discharge and rainfall during the 2015 Storm Frank storm, parameters used in the hydrological model CAESAR–Lisflood and sediment budget statistics of each DEM of difference threshold are available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4847946 Thematic collection: This article is part of the Early Career Research collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/SJG-early-career-research","PeriodicalId":49556,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Geology","volume":"56 1","pages":"101 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1144/sjg2019-005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2019-005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study uses the 2015 ‘Storm Frank’ flood on the River Dee, Aberdeenshire, to assess the impact of extreme events on river dynamics. The Storm Frank flood (>200 year recurrence interval) caused significant local morphological change that was concentrated in the middle portion of the 140 km long river and overall net degradation that primarily occurred through lateral adjustment processes. Although the flood did not cause widespread change in channel planform, morphological change at the reach scale (<1 km) was significant. Bank scour resulted in channel expansion and lateral migration as well as widespread aggradation on existing gravel beds. The HEC-RAS and CAESAR–Lisflood models were used to determine the impact of morphological changes from the Storm Frank flood on a series of future hypothetical floods. The results show that inundation is highly influenced by the degree of morphological change for moderate floods, but not for high magnitude ones. In-channel scour and bank erosion can lead to an increase in channel capacity, thereby decreasing inundation. Conversely, where conveyance capacity is decreased by aggradation, flood risk inherently increases. The impact of these changes was great for a five-year return period flood, but minimal for a magnitude flood comparable to that of Storm Frank. Our modelling results also reveal that the inundation model is sensitive to the grain size and channel bed roughness input parameters, as these parameters impact flow discharge and flood hydraulics. Accurate determination of sediment parameters and degree of morphological change is therefore critical in flooding modelling and flood hazard management. Supplementary material: Peak discharge and rainfall during the 2015 Storm Frank storm, parameters used in the hydrological model CAESAR–Lisflood and sediment budget statistics of each DEM of difference threshold are available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4847946 Thematic collection: This article is part of the Early Career Research collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/SJG-early-career-research
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰阿伯丁郡一条山地砾石床河流对极端洪水的地貌响应
这项研究利用2015年阿伯丁郡迪河的“弗兰克风暴”洪水来评估极端事件对河流动力学的影响。风暴弗兰克洪水(重现期>200年)造成了显著的局部形态变化,集中在140 km长的河流和主要通过横向调整过程发生的总体净退化。尽管洪水没有引起河道平面形状的广泛变化,但河段尺度上的形态变化(<1 km)是显著的。河岸冲刷导致河道扩张和侧向迁移,以及现有砾石床上的广泛沉积。HEC-RAS和CAESAR–Lisflood模型用于确定弗兰克风暴洪水的形态变化对未来一系列假设洪水的影响。结果表明,中等洪水的淹没受形态变化程度的影响很大,而高等级洪水的淹没不受形态变化的影响。河道内冲刷和河岸侵蚀可增加河道容量,从而减少淹没。相反,当输送能力因沉积而降低时,洪水风险就会增加。这些变化对五年一遇洪水的影响很大,但对与弗兰克风暴相当的量级洪水的影响很小。我们的建模结果还表明,淹没模型对粒度和河床粗糙度输入参数很敏感,因为这些参数会影响流量和洪水水力学。因此,准确确定沉积物参数和形态变化程度对于洪水建模和洪水灾害管理至关重要。补充材料:2015年弗兰克风暴期间的洪峰流量和降雨量、CAESAR–Lisflood水文模型中使用的参数以及差异阈值的每个DEM的泥沙预算统计数据可在以下网站获得:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4847946主题集:本文是早期职业研究集的一部分,可在以下网站获取:https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/SJG-early-career-research
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Journal of Geology
Scottish Journal of Geology 地学-地质学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although published only since 1965, the Scottish Journal of Geology has a long pedigree. It is the joint publication of the Geological Society of Glasgow and the Edinburgh Geological Society, which prior to 1965 published separate Transactions: from 1860 in the case of Glasgow and 1863 for Edinburgh. Traditionally, the Journal has acted as the focus for papers on all aspects of Scottish geology and its contiguous areas, including the surrounding seas. The publication policy has always been outward looking, with the Editors encouraging review papers and papers on broader aspects of the Earth sciences that cannot be discussed solely in terms of Scottish geology. The diverse geology of Scotland continues to provide an important natural laboratory for the study of earth sciences; many seminal studies in geology have been carried out on Scottish rocks, and over the years the results of much of this work had been published in the Journal and its predecessors. The Journal fully deserves its high reputation worldwide and intends to maintain its status in the front rank of publications in the Earth sciences.
期刊最新文献
Functional morphology of the stem in the Lower Palaeozoic crinoid Macrostylocrinus Hall from Scotland Dr John Grant Malcolmson and a reconciliation of the Middle Devonian Lethen Bar and Lethen House fish bearing nodule localities A revision of the ‘coelophysoid-grade’ theropod specimen from the Lower Jurassic of the Isle of Skye (Scotland) Arthropleura trackway ( Diplichnites cuithensis ) from the Carboniferous, Serpukhovikan, Limestone Coal Formation, Clackmannan Group, Linn Park, Glasgow Dipnoan diversity in the early Pennsylvanian of Scotland: new lungfish from the Lower Coal Measures of North Lanarkshire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1