Book Review: Digital-Native News and the Remaking of Latin American Mainstream and Alternative Journalism, by Summer Harlow

IF 3.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1177/10776990231176304
Litzy Galarza
{"title":"Book Review: Digital-Native News and the Remaking of Latin American Mainstream and Alternative Journalism, by Summer Harlow","authors":"Litzy Galarza","doi":"10.1177/10776990231176304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"administration, they feared the invalidation and exclusion of their community by the next president (p. 60). So, Martin concludes it was only natural for them to look for a new icon to ensure their survival. Third, Martin unpacks this constituency’s passive acceptance of Trump. Martin says Christian evangelicals carried out a mantra of “give it to God but still vote as God would have you to.” Now that Trump was interwoven neatly into this constituency’s narrative, they could passively ignore his dissimilar faults and vote for him (p. 77). Particularly in Chapter 6, Martin exemplifies this passivism in how evangelicals overlooked the contradictions of faith presented by Trump’s sexual abuse allegations. From reviewing live digital video recordings, blogs, and social media posts of women pastors and evangelical leaders who were anti-Trump, Martin’s core argument emerges: that the hypocrisy of the narrative Trump has been written into is fallible and that women are the demographic to collapse this narrative. The most significant contribution of this book is that it opens the door for future studies to examine the breaks in consubstantial rhetoric of Christian groups who have written Trump out of their narratives. We have seen in the 2022 midterms evidence of Martin’s claims given that women turned the tide against the red wave by disrupting the evangelical narrative surrounding Trumpism for its ad verrecundiam hypocrisy. By integrating ourselves through digital rhetorical ethnography, rhetoricians can uncover passive hegemonic forces in a digitized, polarized political environment.","PeriodicalId":48095,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231176304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

administration, they feared the invalidation and exclusion of their community by the next president (p. 60). So, Martin concludes it was only natural for them to look for a new icon to ensure their survival. Third, Martin unpacks this constituency’s passive acceptance of Trump. Martin says Christian evangelicals carried out a mantra of “give it to God but still vote as God would have you to.” Now that Trump was interwoven neatly into this constituency’s narrative, they could passively ignore his dissimilar faults and vote for him (p. 77). Particularly in Chapter 6, Martin exemplifies this passivism in how evangelicals overlooked the contradictions of faith presented by Trump’s sexual abuse allegations. From reviewing live digital video recordings, blogs, and social media posts of women pastors and evangelical leaders who were anti-Trump, Martin’s core argument emerges: that the hypocrisy of the narrative Trump has been written into is fallible and that women are the demographic to collapse this narrative. The most significant contribution of this book is that it opens the door for future studies to examine the breaks in consubstantial rhetoric of Christian groups who have written Trump out of their narratives. We have seen in the 2022 midterms evidence of Martin’s claims given that women turned the tide against the red wave by disrupting the evangelical narrative surrounding Trumpism for its ad verrecundiam hypocrisy. By integrating ourselves through digital rhetorical ethnography, rhetoricians can uncover passive hegemonic forces in a digitized, polarized political environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《书评:数字本土新闻与拉丁美洲主流和另类新闻的重塑》,Summer Harlow著
他们担心下一任总统会使他们的社区失效和被排斥(第60页)。因此,马丁得出结论,他们寻找一个新的偶像来确保自己的生存是很自然的。第三,马丁打破了这个选区对特朗普的被动接受。马丁说,基督教福音派信奉“把它交给上帝,但仍然按照上帝的要求投票”的咒语。现在特朗普已经巧妙地融入了这个选区的叙事中,他们可以被动地忽略他不同的缺点,投票给他(第77页)。特别是在第6章中,马丁举例说明了福音派如何忽视特朗普性虐待指控所带来的信仰矛盾。通过回顾反特朗普的女牧师和福音派领袖的现场数字视频记录、博客和社交媒体帖子,马丁的核心论点浮出水面:特朗普所写的叙事的虚伪是容易出错的,女性是破坏这种叙事的人群。这本书最重要的贡献是,它为未来的研究打开了大门,以检验那些将特朗普从他们的叙述中抹去的基督教团体在间接修辞上的突破。我们在2022年中期选举中看到了马丁主张的证据,因为女性通过破坏围绕特朗普主义的福音派叙事来扭转红色浪潮,因为特朗普主义虚伪。通过数字修辞民族志整合我们自己,修辞学家可以揭示数字化、两极分化的政治环境中的被动霸权力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly focuses on research in journalism and mass communication. Each issue features reports of original investigation, presenting the latest developments in theory and methodology of communication, international communication, journalism history, and social and legal problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly also contains book reviews. Refereed. Published four times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Perceptions of Nuclear War: The Imbalanced Co-Orientation Between Russian and American Youth The Effect of Interactivity in Immersive Journalism on Participating In the Media and Through the Media The Impact of the 2020 BLM Resurgence on the Racial Representations of Ads and Ad Evaluations: Analysis of Super Bowl Ads Book Review: The Handbook on Religion and Communication, by Yoel Cohen and Paul Soukup, eds Book Review: Life in Media. A Global Introduction to Media Studies, by Mark Deuze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1