Computation and Analysis of Geopotential Number in São Paulo, Brazil

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth Sciences Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.15446/esrj.v26n2.100645
Valéria Cristina Silva, D. Blitzkow, F. G. V. Almeida, A. Matos, G. Guimarães
{"title":"Computation and Analysis of Geopotential Number in São Paulo, Brazil","authors":"Valéria Cristina Silva, D. Blitzkow, F. G. V. Almeida, A. Matos, G. Guimarães","doi":"10.15446/esrj.v26n2.100645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nIn recent decades, important steps have been taken to implement the physical concepts of Geodesy in practice, con- cerning height systems. Despite the difficulties involving gravity field modeling, with the establishment of conventions, standards, and computation strategies, the realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) is well underway. For a global system, there are constraints for some countries, especially for those with sparse gravity data, mountain regions, and vast areas. In terms of methodology, the computation can be performed directly using the Global Geopotential Models (GGM), recovering existing geoid models, or determining pointwise the gravity potential using integral formulas. In general, the regional gravity modeling is given by numerical integration or least-squares collocation and more recently adopting the spherical radial basis functions. The first approach allows determining the earth’s gravity component at a specific point and adjusting the integral formula according to the gravity coverage. Since so far there is no common sense about the best methodology, computation strategies are been analyzed. In this con- text, the paper aims to contribute to IHRF, computing the geopotential number in the scope of IHRF, using numerical integration to solve the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem and an existing recent quasi-geoid model in four stations in São Paulo state, Brazil. The first approach was performed considering two cases: a radius of 210 km and 110 km of gravimetric data coverage and the Global Geopotential Model GOCO05S truncated at 100 and 200, respectively. The results between solutions have shown a maximum difference of 94 cm, and a minimum difference of 10 cm.\n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":11456,"journal":{"name":"Earth Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v26n2.100645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, important steps have been taken to implement the physical concepts of Geodesy in practice, con- cerning height systems. Despite the difficulties involving gravity field modeling, with the establishment of conventions, standards, and computation strategies, the realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) is well underway. For a global system, there are constraints for some countries, especially for those with sparse gravity data, mountain regions, and vast areas. In terms of methodology, the computation can be performed directly using the Global Geopotential Models (GGM), recovering existing geoid models, or determining pointwise the gravity potential using integral formulas. In general, the regional gravity modeling is given by numerical integration or least-squares collocation and more recently adopting the spherical radial basis functions. The first approach allows determining the earth’s gravity component at a specific point and adjusting the integral formula according to the gravity coverage. Since so far there is no common sense about the best methodology, computation strategies are been analyzed. In this con- text, the paper aims to contribute to IHRF, computing the geopotential number in the scope of IHRF, using numerical integration to solve the Geodetic Boundary Value Problem and an existing recent quasi-geoid model in four stations in São Paulo state, Brazil. The first approach was performed considering two cases: a radius of 210 km and 110 km of gravimetric data coverage and the Global Geopotential Model GOCO05S truncated at 100 and 200, respectively. The results between solutions have shown a maximum difference of 94 cm, and a minimum difference of 10 cm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西圣保罗地电位数的计算与分析
近几十年来,已经采取了重要步骤,在实践中实施大地测量学的物理概念,包括高度系统。尽管重力场建模存在困难,但随着惯例、标准和计算策略的建立,国际高度参考系统(IHRS)的实现正在顺利进行。对于一个全球系统来说,一些国家受到了限制,尤其是那些重力数据稀少、山区和广阔地区的国家。在方法论方面,可以直接使用全球地质势模型(GGM)进行计算,恢复现有的大地水准面模型,或使用积分公式逐点确定重力势。通常,区域重力模型是通过数值积分或最小二乘配置给出的,最近采用了球面径向基函数。第一种方法允许确定地球在特定点的重力分量,并根据重力覆盖范围调整积分公式。由于到目前为止还没有关于最佳方法论的常识,因此对计算策略进行了分析。在本文中,本文旨在为IHRF做出贡献,计算IHRF范围内的位势数,使用数值积分来解决大地测量边值问题和巴西圣保罗州四个站点中现有的近期准大地水准面模型。第一种方法考虑了两种情况:210公里和110公里的重力数据覆盖半径以及分别截断为100和200的全球地球位势模型GOCO05S。解决方案之间的结果显示最大差异为94厘米,最小差异为10厘米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Sciences Research Journal
Earth Sciences Research Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESRJ publishes the results from technical and scientific research on various disciplines of Earth Sciences and its interactions with several engineering applications. Works will only be considered if not previously published anywhere else. Manuscripts must contain information derived from scientific research projects or technical developments. The ideas expressed by publishing in ESRJ are the sole responsibility of the authors. We gladly consider manuscripts in the following subject areas: -Geophysics: Seismology, Seismic Prospecting, Gravimetric, Magnetic and Electrical methods. -Geology: Volcanology, Tectonics, Neotectonics, Geomorphology, Geochemistry, Geothermal Energy, ---Glaciology, Ore Geology, Environmental Geology, Geological Hazards. -Geodesy: Geodynamics, GPS measurements applied to geological and geophysical problems. -Basic Sciences and Computer Science applied to Geology and Geophysics. -Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences. -Oceanography. -Planetary Sciences. -Engineering: Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Engineering, Geological Engineering, Geotechnics.
期刊最新文献
Study on large-gradient deformation of mining areas based on InSAR-PEK technology Estimation of evaporation from the water surface using the norm operator Computer vision techniques applied to automatic detection of sinusoids in borehole resistivity imaging – A comparison with the MSD method Landslide susceptibility mapping of Penang Island, Malaysia, using remote sensing and multi-geophysical methods Influence of Compaction on Electrical Resistivity Characteristics of Fine-grained Soil East of Baghdad City, Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1