Greenness evaluation of sample preparation methods by GAPI for the determination of pesticides in grape: A review

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teac.2023.e00206
Yerkanat Syrgabek , Mereke Alimzhanova , Pedro A. García-Encina , Juan José Jiménez , Rebeca López-Serna
{"title":"Greenness evaluation of sample preparation methods by GAPI for the determination of pesticides in grape: A review","authors":"Yerkanat Syrgabek ,&nbsp;Mereke Alimzhanova ,&nbsp;Pedro A. García-Encina ,&nbsp;Juan José Jiménez ,&nbsp;Rebeca López-Serna","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2023.e00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pesticides are major contaminants in grapes and their by-products. Different methods for sample preparation and separation are used for determining different pesticides in grapes. However, until now, the environmental friendliness<span> of these methods has not been assessed fully. At present time, several tools such as Eco-Scale, NEMI, GAPI, AGREE are available to evaluate the environmental sustainability of methods such as sample preparation, extraction, and separation. Each tool has its benefits and drawbacks. Moreover, the results obtained with the help of each tool may lead to different conclusions. This paper is aimed to review different sample preparation methods for the determination of pesticides in grapes found in the scientific literature. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) tool was chosen to evaluate the environmental friendliness of each methodology in this study. This research also shows the importance of using aforementioned tools in the development of future analytical methods before using practical tests. In addition to greenness, tool helps to assess assessing minimize the use of chemical hazards and avoid risks to human health and emissions to the environment. Method greenness assessment is suggested to be included in method validation protocols.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00206"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158823000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pesticides are major contaminants in grapes and their by-products. Different methods for sample preparation and separation are used for determining different pesticides in grapes. However, until now, the environmental friendliness of these methods has not been assessed fully. At present time, several tools such as Eco-Scale, NEMI, GAPI, AGREE are available to evaluate the environmental sustainability of methods such as sample preparation, extraction, and separation. Each tool has its benefits and drawbacks. Moreover, the results obtained with the help of each tool may lead to different conclusions. This paper is aimed to review different sample preparation methods for the determination of pesticides in grapes found in the scientific literature. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) tool was chosen to evaluate the environmental friendliness of each methodology in this study. This research also shows the importance of using aforementioned tools in the development of future analytical methods before using practical tests. In addition to greenness, tool helps to assess assessing minimize the use of chemical hazards and avoid risks to human health and emissions to the environment. Method greenness assessment is suggested to be included in method validation protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GAPI法测定葡萄中农药样品制备方法的绿色性评价
农药是葡萄及其副产品中的主要污染物。葡萄中不同农药的测定采用不同的样品制备和分离方法。然而,到目前为止,这些方法的环境友好性还没有得到充分的评估。目前,有Eco-Scale、NEMI、GAPI、AGREE等工具可用于评估样品制备、提取和分离等方法的环境可持续性。每种工具都有其优点和缺点。此外,利用每种工具获得的结果可能会导致不同的结论。本文综述了科学文献中葡萄中农药含量测定的不同样品制备方法。本研究选择绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)工具来评估每种方法的环境友好性。这项研究还表明,在使用实际测试之前,在开发未来的分析方法中使用上述工具的重要性。除绿色外,该工具还有助于评估评估最大限度地减少化学品危害的使用,并避免对人类健康的风险和对环境的排放。建议将方法绿色评价纳入方法验证方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
期刊最新文献
Green chemistry-based strategies for liquid-phase microextraction and determination of mercury species Analytical methodologies for the determination of phthalates in environmental matrices Microplastics and nanoplastics in groundwater: Occurrence, analysis, and identification Evaluation of European watch list contaminants in environmental matrices and microplastics: Analytical strategies, mechanisms of adsorption and occurrence Pharmaceuticals and micro(nano)plastics in the environment: Sorption and analytical challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1