{"title":"“I wanna be a toy”","authors":"Lexi Webster","doi":"10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream\n conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive\n social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple\n instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed\n socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and\n underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1)\n transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and\n transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the\n least self-sexualising user-group.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLS.17016.WEB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream
conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive
social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple
instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed
socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and
underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1)
transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and
transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the
least self-sexualising user-group.