Identifying pluralistic approaches in language subjects in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden – A comparative curriculum analysis

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language, Culture and Curriculum Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1080/07908318.2022.2156528
Natascha Drachmann, Åsta Haukås, A. Lundberg
{"title":"Identifying pluralistic approaches in language subjects in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden – A comparative curriculum analysis","authors":"Natascha Drachmann, Åsta Haukås, A. Lundberg","doi":"10.1080/07908318.2022.2156528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Scandinavia, plurilingualism has been embraced as an important goal in language curricula. However, research shows that teachers struggle to understand what plurilingualism is and how it can be implemented. To address this lack of clarity, we analysed the curricula for the three main language subjects of schooling in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden with the purpose of identifying which pluralistic approaches can be found in them. We based our analysis on the three main approaches described in The Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches to Languages and Cultures: integrated didactic approach (IDA), intercomprehension between related languages (ICRL) and eveil aux langues (EAL). We found several similarities across the Scandinavian countries, but also some major differences, suggesting that plurilingual education in these countries will likely have different learning outcomes for the students. For example, IDA is lacking in the Swedish curriculum, and the goals for ICRL are more ambitious in Denmark than in the other countries. Furthermore, Norway and Sweden include national minority languages in their pluralistic approaches, whereas no attention is given to language diversity in regions with close political bonds to Denmark, such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland.","PeriodicalId":17945,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","volume":"36 1","pages":"327 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2156528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Scandinavia, plurilingualism has been embraced as an important goal in language curricula. However, research shows that teachers struggle to understand what plurilingualism is and how it can be implemented. To address this lack of clarity, we analysed the curricula for the three main language subjects of schooling in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden with the purpose of identifying which pluralistic approaches can be found in them. We based our analysis on the three main approaches described in The Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches to Languages and Cultures: integrated didactic approach (IDA), intercomprehension between related languages (ICRL) and eveil aux langues (EAL). We found several similarities across the Scandinavian countries, but also some major differences, suggesting that plurilingual education in these countries will likely have different learning outcomes for the students. For example, IDA is lacking in the Swedish curriculum, and the goals for ICRL are more ambitious in Denmark than in the other countries. Furthermore, Norway and Sweden include national minority languages in their pluralistic approaches, whereas no attention is given to language diversity in regions with close political bonds to Denmark, such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定丹麦、挪威和瑞典语言学科的多元化方法——比较课程分析
摘要在斯堪的纳维亚半岛,多语言主义已被视为语言课程的一个重要目标。然而,研究表明,教师们很难理解什么是多能主义以及如何实现它。为了解决这种不明确的问题,我们分析了丹麦、挪威和瑞典三个主要语言科目的课程,目的是确定在这些科目中可以找到哪些多元化的方法。我们的分析基于《语言和文化多元方法参考框架》中描述的三种主要方法:综合教学法(IDA)、相关语言之间的相互理解法(ICRL)和各种辅助语言(EAL)。我们发现斯堪的纳维亚国家有一些相似之处,但也有一些主要差异,这表明这些国家的多语言教育可能会对学生产生不同的学习结果。例如,瑞典的课程中缺乏IDA,丹麦的ICRL目标比其他国家更为雄心勃勃。此外,挪威和瑞典在其多元化方法中纳入了少数民族语言,而在与丹麦有密切政治联系的地区,如法罗群岛、冰岛和格陵兰岛,却没有关注语言多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language, Culture and Curriculum is a well-established journal that seeks to enhance the understanding of the relations between the three dimensions of its title. It welcomes work dealing with a wide range of languages (mother tongues, global English, foreign, minority, immigrant, heritage, or endangered languages) in the context of bilingual and multilingual education and first, second or additional language learning. It focuses on research into cultural content, literacy or intercultural and transnational studies, usually related to curriculum development, organisation or implementation. The journal also includes studies of language instruction, teacher training, teaching methods and language-in-education policy. It is open to investigations of language attitudes, beliefs and identities as well as to contributions dealing with language learning processes and language practices inside and outside of the classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum encourages submissions from a variety of disciplinary approaches. Since its inception in 1988 the journal has tried to cover a wide range of topics and it has disseminated articles from authors from all continents.
期刊最新文献
“It’s exactly how I pictured it!”: the construction and impact of the tourist gaze in study abroad Affordances, challenges, and possibilities of Hallyu in the classroom: Korean language instructors’ perspectives Agency, authority and universality in the promotion of global ELT textbook series Examining the resilience of two early career world language teachers: a two-year case study Localising international schools in multilingual Switzerland: from parental strategies to institutional dual-language programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1