Cultural dispersion and stock liquidity

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1472
John F. Zhang
{"title":"Cultural dispersion and stock liquidity","authors":"John F. Zhang","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This paper examines whether cultural dispersion of a multinational firm affects its stock trading in the market. The result shows that the stock liquidity negatively relates to the degree of cultural dispersion, suggesting it is costlier to trade stocks of culturally diverse firms. Among five measures of stock liquidity, Chae's (2005) turnover measure demonstrates the most consistent effect after addressing potential omitted variables and selection biases. A robustness test that extends our sample to include purely domestic firms confirms the main result of the negative effect of cultural dispersion. Furthermore, while the relation between cultural dispersion and stock liquidity may not be exactly linear, such a negative association overall holds. In addition, the influence of cultural dispersion on stock trading takes effects mainly through the agency and external information environment channels and is more pronounced for lower risk-taking multinationals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This result has three practical implications for investment management. First, it is important to consider the internal cultural diversity when investing multinational firms. Second, the evaluation of firm liquidity goes beyond financial fundamentals or market mechanism. When a firm increase its degree of informational complexity and unfamiliarity, it tends to decrease its attractiveness to investors. Last but not least, when investing globally, cultural differences is an important consideration. Using stock liquidity as a research platform, this study suggests that the effect of cultural difference is indeed material.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

This paper examines whether cultural dispersion of a multinational firm affects its stock trading in the market. The result shows that the stock liquidity negatively relates to the degree of cultural dispersion, suggesting it is costlier to trade stocks of culturally diverse firms. Among five measures of stock liquidity, Chae's (2005) turnover measure demonstrates the most consistent effect after addressing potential omitted variables and selection biases. A robustness test that extends our sample to include purely domestic firms confirms the main result of the negative effect of cultural dispersion. Furthermore, while the relation between cultural dispersion and stock liquidity may not be exactly linear, such a negative association overall holds. In addition, the influence of cultural dispersion on stock trading takes effects mainly through the agency and external information environment channels and is more pronounced for lower risk-taking multinationals.

Managerial Summary

This result has three practical implications for investment management. First, it is important to consider the internal cultural diversity when investing multinational firms. Second, the evaluation of firm liquidity goes beyond financial fundamentals or market mechanism. When a firm increase its degree of informational complexity and unfamiliarity, it tends to decrease its attractiveness to investors. Last but not least, when investing globally, cultural differences is an important consideration. Using stock liquidity as a research platform, this study suggests that the effect of cultural difference is indeed material.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化分散与股票流动性
研究摘要 本文研究了跨国公司的文化分散是否会影响其在市场上的股票交易。结果表明,股票流动性与文化离散程度呈负相关,这表明交易文化离散公司的股票需要付出更高的成本。在五种衡量股票流动性的指标中,Chae(2005)的成交量指标在解决了潜在的遗漏变量和选择偏差后,显示出了最一致的效果。我们将样本扩大到纯粹的国内企业,这一稳健性检验证实了文化分散的负面影响这一主要结果。此外,虽然文化分散与股票流动性之间的关系可能并不完全是线性的,但这种负相关关系总体上是成立的。此外,文化离散对股票交易的影响主要通过代理和外部信息环境渠道产生,并且对风险承担能力较低的跨国公司的影响更为明显。 管理总结 这一结果对投资管理有三个实际意义。首先,在投资跨国公司时必须考虑内部文化的多样性。其次,对企业流动性的评估不仅仅局限于财务基本面或市场机制。当企业的信息复杂度和陌生度增加时,往往会降低对投资者的吸引力。最后但并非最不重要的一点是,在进行全球投资时,文化差异是一个重要的考虑因素。本研究以股票流动性为研究平台,表明文化差异的影响确实是实质性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Foreign institutional investors and equity share decisions in cross‐border mergers and acquisitions Do financial crises moderate the influence of stakeholder rights protection on M&A activity: The influence of institutional logics and power? Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1