Bryan J. Pesta , Jan te Nijenhuis , Jordan Lasker , Emil O.W. Kirkegaard , John G.R. Fuerst
{"title":"On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)","authors":"Bryan J. Pesta , Jan te Nijenhuis , Jordan Lasker , Emil O.W. Kirkegaard , John G.R. Fuerst","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in <em>Intelligence</em><span> regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&T published their critique in </span><em>Perspectives on Psychological Science</em> (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in Intelligence regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&T published their critique in Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.
在此,我们对詹格兰德和图克海默(2022;G&T)最近对我们发表在《情报》上的关于Scarr-Rowe假设的荟萃分析的批评,以及智力遗传能力明显缺乏假定的种族/民族差异(Pesta et al., 2020)。我们的反驳分为三个部分,以解决他们批评中普遍存在的错误陈述:第1部分侧重于概念和理论要点。第2节讨论了方法、统计和解释要点。第3节提供了G&T提出的支持我们原始解释的新分析。我们注意到,G&T在《心理科学展望》(PoPS)上发表了他们的批评,在他们的论文发表之前没有邀请我们回应,我们随后提交的反驳也没有被接受。基于可能违反道德规范的原因,我们对这些事件的失败申诉详见此处(附录E)。我们认识到,这是一个有争议的研究领域,存在合理的分歧,希望我们的回应保持一定程度的严谨性和专业性,以使其他人可以效仿。