On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737
Bryan J. Pesta , Jan te Nijenhuis , Jordan Lasker , Emil O.W. Kirkegaard , John G.R. Fuerst
{"title":"On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)","authors":"Bryan J. Pesta ,&nbsp;Jan te Nijenhuis ,&nbsp;Jordan Lasker ,&nbsp;Emil O.W. Kirkegaard ,&nbsp;John G.R. Fuerst","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&amp;T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in <em>Intelligence</em><span> regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&amp;T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&amp;T published their critique in </span><em>Perspectives on Psychological Science</em> (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in Intelligence regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&T published their critique in Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力遗传力的群体差异:对Giangrande和Turkheimer(2022)的回答
在此,我们对詹格兰德和图克海默(2022;G&T)最近对我们发表在《情报》上的关于Scarr-Rowe假设的荟萃分析的批评,以及智力遗传能力明显缺乏假定的种族/民族差异(Pesta et al., 2020)。我们的反驳分为三个部分,以解决他们批评中普遍存在的错误陈述:第1部分侧重于概念和理论要点。第2节讨论了方法、统计和解释要点。第3节提供了G&T提出的支持我们原始解释的新分析。我们注意到,G&T在《心理科学展望》(PoPS)上发表了他们的批评,在他们的论文发表之前没有邀请我们回应,我们随后提交的反驳也没有被接受。基于可能违反道德规范的原因,我们对这些事件的失败申诉详见此处(附录E)。我们认识到,这是一个有争议的研究领域,存在合理的分歧,希望我们的回应保持一定程度的严谨性和专业性,以使其他人可以效仿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Putting the Flynn effect under the microscope: Item-level patterns in NLSYC PIAT-math scores, 1986–2004 Editorial Board The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI Does test preparation mediate the effect of parents' level of educational attainment on medical school admission test performance? Shared reading aloud fosters intelligence: Three cluster-randomized control trials in elementary and middle school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1