In search of the Holy Grail? The EU Commission's new approach to Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation

A. Looijestijn-Clearie, C. Rusu, Marc J.M. Veenbrink
{"title":"In search of the Holy Grail? The EU Commission's new approach to Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation","authors":"A. Looijestijn-Clearie, C. Rusu, Marc J.M. Veenbrink","doi":"10.1177/1023263X221139605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently in certain sectors of the economy, in particular in the digital, pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, an increase in the number of concentrations has been detected involving emerging and innovative undertakings with competitive potential but which generate little or no turnover at the time of the transaction. Many such transactions do not fall under the EU merger control system or the domestic merger control systems of the Member States but may, nevertheless, have a detrimental impact on competition in the internal market. The European Commission reacted to this situation by adopting, on 26 March 2021, Guidance on the application of Article 22 (Article 22 Guidance). In this Article 22 Guidance, the Commission announced that it will abandon its previous practice of not accepting Article 22 referral requests from National Competition Authorities (NCAs) which are not competent to review the concentration at stake under their domestic rules. Instead, the Commission will now encourage and accept Article 22 referral requests, particularly from NCAs which do not have jurisdiction over the transaction at stake under their national merger regimes. The Article 22 Guidance gives rise to a number of questions and problems which we discuss in this article.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"550 - 571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X221139605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently in certain sectors of the economy, in particular in the digital, pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, an increase in the number of concentrations has been detected involving emerging and innovative undertakings with competitive potential but which generate little or no turnover at the time of the transaction. Many such transactions do not fall under the EU merger control system or the domestic merger control systems of the Member States but may, nevertheless, have a detrimental impact on competition in the internal market. The European Commission reacted to this situation by adopting, on 26 March 2021, Guidance on the application of Article 22 (Article 22 Guidance). In this Article 22 Guidance, the Commission announced that it will abandon its previous practice of not accepting Article 22 referral requests from National Competition Authorities (NCAs) which are not competent to review the concentration at stake under their domestic rules. Instead, the Commission will now encourage and accept Article 22 referral requests, particularly from NCAs which do not have jurisdiction over the transaction at stake under their national merger regimes. The Article 22 Guidance gives rise to a number of questions and problems which we discuss in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找圣杯?欧盟委员会对《欧盟合并条例》第22条的新做法
最近,在某些经济部门,特别是在数字、制药和生物技术部门,发现涉及具有竞争潜力但在交易时产生很少或没有营业额的新兴和创新企业的集中数量有所增加。许多此类交易不属于欧盟合并控制制度或成员国国内合并控制制度,但可能对内部市场的竞争产生不利影响。针对这一情况,欧盟委员会于2021年3月26日通过了关于第22条适用的指南(第22条指南)。在本第22条指导意见中,欧盟委员会宣布,它将放弃以前不接受国家竞争管理机构(NCAs)第22条转介请求的做法,这些国家竞争管理机构根据其国内规则无权审查利害关系的集中。相反,委员会现在将鼓励并接受第22条的转介请求,特别是来自那些在其国家合并制度下对所涉交易没有管辖权的国家并购机构的转介请求。《第22条指引》引起了我们在本文中讨论的一些问题和问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Non-contractual liability of the EU: Need for a ‘diligent’ administrator test The European Arrest Warrant and the protection of the best interests of the child: The Court's last word on the limits of mutual recognition and the evolving obligations of national judicial authorities OP v. Commune d’Ans: When equality, intersectionality and state neutrality collide DPA independence and ‘indirect’ access – illusory in Belgium, France and Germany? Chilling effect: Turning the poison into an antidote for fundamental rights in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1