La pratique répétée du Trail Making Test réduit les différences liées à l’âge sur la performance à ce test

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychologie Francaise Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.002
L. Burger , L. Taconnat , L. Angel , P. Plusquellec , S. Fay
{"title":"La pratique répétée du Trail Making Test réduit les différences liées à l’âge sur la performance à ce test","authors":"L. Burger ,&nbsp;L. Taconnat ,&nbsp;L. Angel ,&nbsp;P. Plusquellec ,&nbsp;S. Fay","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Age-related impairment in executive functioning has been found to explain partially the decrease of cognitive performance with aging. However, the practice of an executive test can improve performance to this test. In the present study, we investigated first how the practice of the Trail Making Test (TMT, flexibility test) may influence the age-related deficit to the performance in this test and then how the performance tended to improve, and at which pace, through the practice of this executive test. Two age groups of participants (young and older adults) practiced the TMT and were compared to two control groups (i.e., no practice between pre- and post-test). The practice groups’ scores were obtained at the end of each session. Globally, the results showed an improvement of performance (1) greater in the practice groups than in the control groups and (2) in practice groups, greater in older adults than in younger ones. Both younger and older adults progressed during the early practice sessions but the younger ones reached their optimal level earlier than the older adults who continued to improve over the sessions. These results could have a major impact on adapting cognitive stimulation programs to individual's characteristics such as age.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"66 2","pages":"Pages 141-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298417300158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Age-related impairment in executive functioning has been found to explain partially the decrease of cognitive performance with aging. However, the practice of an executive test can improve performance to this test. In the present study, we investigated first how the practice of the Trail Making Test (TMT, flexibility test) may influence the age-related deficit to the performance in this test and then how the performance tended to improve, and at which pace, through the practice of this executive test. Two age groups of participants (young and older adults) practiced the TMT and were compared to two control groups (i.e., no practice between pre- and post-test). The practice groups’ scores were obtained at the end of each session. Globally, the results showed an improvement of performance (1) greater in the practice groups than in the control groups and (2) in practice groups, greater in older adults than in younger ones. Both younger and older adults progressed during the early practice sessions but the younger ones reached their optimal level earlier than the older adults who continued to improve over the sessions. These results could have a major impact on adapting cognitive stimulation programs to individual's characteristics such as age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复的越轨测试减少了与年龄相关的测试表现差异
与年龄相关的执行功能障碍已被发现可以部分解释随着年龄增长认知能力下降的原因。然而,执行测试的实践可以提高该测试的性能。在本研究中,我们首先考察了柔韧性测验(TMT, Trail Making Test)的练习如何影响年龄相关的测试成绩缺陷,然后通过这项执行测试的练习,研究了年龄相关的测试成绩如何倾向于提高,以及以何种速度提高。两个年龄组的参与者(年轻人和老年人)练习TMT,并与两个对照组(即在测试前和测试后之间没有练习)进行比较。练习组的分数在每次练习结束时获得。在全球范围内,结果显示:(1)练习组的表现比对照组更好,(2)练习组的老年人比年轻人更好。年轻人和老年人在早期的练习中都取得了进步,但年轻人比老年人更早达到最佳水平,老年人在练习过程中继续提高。这些结果可能会对使认知刺激方案适应个人特征(如年龄)产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Influence of sex on judgments of an aggressive North African woman Quelle formation des savoirs sur le cancer et la chimiothérapie orale en contexte d’ETP ? Apports d’une approche psychosociale articulée à un dispositif de triangulation méthodologique Étude exploratoire de profils d’enseignants à risque de burnout : association avec les processus de coping et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité Adaptation française et propriétés psychométriques de l’échelle d’utilisabilité perçue des sites web « Design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability (DEEP) »
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1