Historical corruption in a ‘non-corrupt’ society: Aotearoa New Zealand

IF 1.2 4区 法学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1108/pap-01-2022-0008
R. Gregory, Daniel R. Zirker
{"title":"Historical corruption in a ‘non-corrupt’ society: Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"R. Gregory, Daniel R. Zirker","doi":"10.1108/pap-01-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reconsider, from a historical perspective, New Zealand’s reputation as a country largely without corruption, with particular reference to the colonial government’s confiscation of Māori land in the 19th century and beyond.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on published historical commentary.FindingsThe findings are that much of the Māori land confiscation was rendered legal for illegitimate purposes, and that the colonial and successive New Zealand governments abrogated the country’s foundational document, the Treaty of Waitangi, signed between the colonial government and many Māori chiefs in 1840. Adverse consequences for Māori have been felt to this day, despite the Treaty settlements process that began with the Māori renaissance in the mid-1970s.Originality/valueThe academic analysis of corruption in New Zealand has seldom if ever adopted this historical perspective.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-01-2022-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to reconsider, from a historical perspective, New Zealand’s reputation as a country largely without corruption, with particular reference to the colonial government’s confiscation of Māori land in the 19th century and beyond.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on published historical commentary.FindingsThe findings are that much of the Māori land confiscation was rendered legal for illegitimate purposes, and that the colonial and successive New Zealand governments abrogated the country’s foundational document, the Treaty of Waitangi, signed between the colonial government and many Māori chiefs in 1840. Adverse consequences for Māori have been felt to this day, despite the Treaty settlements process that began with the Māori renaissance in the mid-1970s.Originality/valueThe academic analysis of corruption in New Zealand has seldom if ever adopted this historical perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“非腐败”社会中的历史腐败:新西兰奥特罗亚
本文的目的是从历史的角度重新考虑新西兰作为一个基本上没有腐败的国家的声誉,特别是参考19世纪及以后殖民政府没收Māori土地。设计/方法/方法本文基于已发表的历史评论。调查结果发现,大部分Māori土地没收都是出于非法目的而合法的,殖民地和后来的新西兰政府废除了该国的基础文件——1840年殖民政府与许多Māori酋长签署的《怀唐伊条约》(Treaty of Waitangi)。尽管从1970年代中期Māori复兴开始的《条约》解决进程至今仍对Māori产生不利影响。对新西兰腐败的学术分析很少采用这种历史视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A stakeholder analysis for sustainable development of Maritime Village in Semarang coastal community, Indonesia Indigenous cultures and employee efficiency: the moderating effect of cronyism in state-owned enterprises in Ghana Agencification, policy reversal and the reforms of the French health care system Critical success factors of Public-Private Partnerships in the education sector Citizens’ trust and digital attitudes: evidence from city digital transformation in Shanghai, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1