Inclusive Instruction for Students Receiving Special Education Services for Emotional Disturbance: A Survey Development Study

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION Pub Date : 2019-12-23 DOI:10.1177/1534508419895085
J. McKenna, Xiaoxia Newton, E. Bergman
{"title":"Inclusive Instruction for Students Receiving Special Education Services for Emotional Disturbance: A Survey Development Study","authors":"J. McKenna, Xiaoxia Newton, E. Bergman","doi":"10.1177/1534508419895085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the majority of students receiving special education services for emotional disturbance (ED) receive a significant amount of instruction in general education classrooms, evidence-based practices for educating students with ED in these settings have yet to be identified. As a result, school-based practitioners must primarily rely on professional recommendations and values when planning and delivering inclusive instruction for this student population. This study investigated the internal consistency and factor structure of a survey measure designed to obtain information on practitioner knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of recommended classroom-based practices for the inclusive instruction of students with ED. Results indicate adequate internal consistency. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure: Behavior Support, Classroom Management, Differentiation, and Instructional Practices. Study limitations include a low response rate for the electronic survey and reliance on responses from practitioners from one geographic area. Future investigations are necessary to refine the survey instrument and to obtain data from teachers from other geographic areas.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"46 1","pages":"207 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1534508419895085","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419895085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although the majority of students receiving special education services for emotional disturbance (ED) receive a significant amount of instruction in general education classrooms, evidence-based practices for educating students with ED in these settings have yet to be identified. As a result, school-based practitioners must primarily rely on professional recommendations and values when planning and delivering inclusive instruction for this student population. This study investigated the internal consistency and factor structure of a survey measure designed to obtain information on practitioner knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of recommended classroom-based practices for the inclusive instruction of students with ED. Results indicate adequate internal consistency. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure: Behavior Support, Classroom Management, Differentiation, and Instructional Practices. Study limitations include a low response rate for the electronic survey and reliance on responses from practitioners from one geographic area. Future investigations are necessary to refine the survey instrument and to obtain data from teachers from other geographic areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪障碍特殊教育服务学生的全纳辅导:一项调查发展研究
虽然大多数接受特殊教育服务的情感障碍(ED)学生在普通教育课堂上接受了大量的指导,但在这些环境中教育ED学生的循证实践尚未确定。因此,在为这一学生群体规划和提供包容性教学时,以学校为基础的从业者必须主要依靠专业建议和价值观。本研究调查了一项调查措施的内部一致性和因素结构,该调查措施旨在获得实践者知识、使用情况和推荐的课堂实践对ED学生包容性教学的感知有效性的信息。结果表明内部一致性足够。探索性因素分析(EFA)揭示了四因素结构:行为支持、课堂管理、差异化和教学实践。研究的局限性包括电子调查的低回复率和依赖于来自一个地理区域的从业者的回答。未来的调查有必要完善调查工具,并从其他地理区域的教师那里获得数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines What Is Important to Measure in Sentence-Level Language Comprehension? Universal Screening for Student Mental Health: Selection of Norming Group Validation of the Youth Internalizing Problem Screener in Singapore Using Empirical Information to Prioritize Early Literacy Assessment and Instruction in Preschool and Kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1