From the Editor—In This Issue

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Social Work Education Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958
D. Parrish
{"title":"From the Editor—In This Issue","authors":"D. Parrish","doi":"10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Journal of Social Work Education (JSWE) begins with an excellent guest editorial from Singer, Báez, and Rios titled “AI Creates the Message: Integrating AI Language Learning Models into Social Work Education and Practice.” This very timely editorial offers a description of the pros and cons of ChatGPT in social work education, as well as recommendations for using ChatGPT for teaching, research, and practice. Specific ideas are offered for each, including using AI to design your syllabus and guidance to inform your students about its use in your class. I am grateful to these authors for this high-quality manuscript and the quick turnaround time so we could get it to press quickly for our readers! The next article by Mirick and Wladkowski, “Experiences of Pregnant and Parenting Female Students in Doctoral Programs,” describes the results of a survey of women who were pregnant or parenting during their social work doctoral studies. They highlight important implications for social work doctoral programs, suggesting that social workers are ethically obligated to address gender-based equity issues and the multiple challenges these students experience. In “Infusing MSW Programs With Disability Studies and Disability Justice: How to Create Explicit Curriculum,” Berridge, Ganti, Taylor, Rain, and Bahl describe their MSW curricula infusion process and integrating an intersectional disability justice movement framework. They discuss the background and urgency of such approaches to reduce issues of social injustice. Magier, Newman, Kimiecik, Okamoto, Beasley, Shute, and Tucker discuss the intersection of social work education with sport, highlight potential opportunities for addressing important needs within the field of sport and report on a qualitative study with social workers in sport in “Understanding the Needs of Social Workers in Sport Settings: Opportunities for Specialized Education and Training.” In “Colorblind Attitudes, Empathy, and Shame: Preparing White Students for Anti-Racist Social Work Practice,” Brock-Petroshius, Garcia-Perez, Gross, and Abrams report on an analysis of a cross sectional survey of White MSW students to assess the relationships between racial knowledge and emotions as predictors of anti-racist behaviors. They discuss the implications of their findings for antiracist social work education. Slay, Robinson, and Rhodes offer shared perspectives from Strong Black Women (SBW) schema and resilience theory to describe their ability to adapt to changes during the global pandemic in “Shared Perspectives of Strength Among Black Women Social Work Educators in a Global Pandemic.” Conner, Dyson, Jones, and Drew then present a mixed-methods study to explore the experiences of social work faculty and staff who have experience being supervised by a Black administrator in “Black Experiences Matter: Reflections of Black Faculty Experiences With Black Administrators.” In “A ‘Totally, Acceptably Racist Environment’: Examining Anti-Black Racism in a School of Social Work,” Lilly, Hillyer, Jaggers, and Garnigan utilized collective autobiographical methods within a Critical Race Theory framework to better understand Black social work students’ experiences of anti-Black racism in Predominantly White Institutions. This study highlights important findings and implications for the implicit and explicit social work curricula, as well as tangible next steps to reduce the harm and the emotional labor Black students experience from anti-Black racism in these contexts. Next, Thyberg discusses critical social work (CSW) as a framework for addressing racism and oppression in social work and reports on a survey of social work students regarding their experience of critical social work learning in “Preparing Social Workers for Anti-Oppressive Practice: Evaluating the Role of Critical Social Work Education.” The next two articles focus on political social work education. The first, “The Voter Engagement Model: Preparing the Next Generation of Social Workers for Political Practice” by Hylton, Lane, Smith, Ostrander, and Powers, describes and reports on the results of an evaluation of a voter JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION 2023, VOL. 59, NO. 2, 291–293 https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958","PeriodicalId":17012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Education","volume":"59 1","pages":"291 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This issue of Journal of Social Work Education (JSWE) begins with an excellent guest editorial from Singer, Báez, and Rios titled “AI Creates the Message: Integrating AI Language Learning Models into Social Work Education and Practice.” This very timely editorial offers a description of the pros and cons of ChatGPT in social work education, as well as recommendations for using ChatGPT for teaching, research, and practice. Specific ideas are offered for each, including using AI to design your syllabus and guidance to inform your students about its use in your class. I am grateful to these authors for this high-quality manuscript and the quick turnaround time so we could get it to press quickly for our readers! The next article by Mirick and Wladkowski, “Experiences of Pregnant and Parenting Female Students in Doctoral Programs,” describes the results of a survey of women who were pregnant or parenting during their social work doctoral studies. They highlight important implications for social work doctoral programs, suggesting that social workers are ethically obligated to address gender-based equity issues and the multiple challenges these students experience. In “Infusing MSW Programs With Disability Studies and Disability Justice: How to Create Explicit Curriculum,” Berridge, Ganti, Taylor, Rain, and Bahl describe their MSW curricula infusion process and integrating an intersectional disability justice movement framework. They discuss the background and urgency of such approaches to reduce issues of social injustice. Magier, Newman, Kimiecik, Okamoto, Beasley, Shute, and Tucker discuss the intersection of social work education with sport, highlight potential opportunities for addressing important needs within the field of sport and report on a qualitative study with social workers in sport in “Understanding the Needs of Social Workers in Sport Settings: Opportunities for Specialized Education and Training.” In “Colorblind Attitudes, Empathy, and Shame: Preparing White Students for Anti-Racist Social Work Practice,” Brock-Petroshius, Garcia-Perez, Gross, and Abrams report on an analysis of a cross sectional survey of White MSW students to assess the relationships between racial knowledge and emotions as predictors of anti-racist behaviors. They discuss the implications of their findings for antiracist social work education. Slay, Robinson, and Rhodes offer shared perspectives from Strong Black Women (SBW) schema and resilience theory to describe their ability to adapt to changes during the global pandemic in “Shared Perspectives of Strength Among Black Women Social Work Educators in a Global Pandemic.” Conner, Dyson, Jones, and Drew then present a mixed-methods study to explore the experiences of social work faculty and staff who have experience being supervised by a Black administrator in “Black Experiences Matter: Reflections of Black Faculty Experiences With Black Administrators.” In “A ‘Totally, Acceptably Racist Environment’: Examining Anti-Black Racism in a School of Social Work,” Lilly, Hillyer, Jaggers, and Garnigan utilized collective autobiographical methods within a Critical Race Theory framework to better understand Black social work students’ experiences of anti-Black racism in Predominantly White Institutions. This study highlights important findings and implications for the implicit and explicit social work curricula, as well as tangible next steps to reduce the harm and the emotional labor Black students experience from anti-Black racism in these contexts. Next, Thyberg discusses critical social work (CSW) as a framework for addressing racism and oppression in social work and reports on a survey of social work students regarding their experience of critical social work learning in “Preparing Social Workers for Anti-Oppressive Practice: Evaluating the Role of Critical Social Work Education.” The next two articles focus on political social work education. The first, “The Voter Engagement Model: Preparing the Next Generation of Social Workers for Political Practice” by Hylton, Lane, Smith, Ostrander, and Powers, describes and reports on the results of an evaluation of a voter JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION 2023, VOL. 59, NO. 2, 291–293 https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自编辑——本期
本期《社会工作教育杂志》(JSWE)以Singer、Báez和Rios的一篇优秀客座社论开头,题为“人工智能创造信息:将人工智能语言学习模型融入社会工作教育和实践”。这篇非常及时的社论描述了ChatGPT在社会工作教育中的利弊,以及使用ChatGPT进行教学、研究和实践的建议。每种方法都有具体的想法,包括使用人工智能设计教学大纲和指导,让学生了解它在课堂上的使用情况。我感谢这些作者提供的这份高质量的手稿和快速的周转时间,这样我们就可以为读者快速出版!Mirick和Wladkowski的下一篇文章《博士项目中怀孕和养育女学生的经历》描述了一项针对在社会工作博士研究期间怀孕或养育女性的调查结果。他们强调了对社会工作博士项目的重要影响,表明社会工作者在道德上有义务解决基于性别的公平问题以及这些学生所面临的多重挑战。Berridge、Ganti、Taylor、Rain和Bahl在“将城市生活垃圾项目融入残疾研究和残疾司法:如何创建明确的课程”中描述了他们的城市生活垃圾课程融入过程和整合跨部门残疾司法运动框架。他们讨论了减少社会不公正问题的这种方法的背景和紧迫性。Magier、Newman、Kimiecik、Okamoto、Beasley、Shute和Tucker讨论了社会工作教育与体育的交叉点,强调了解决体育领域重要需求的潜在机会,并在《理解体育环境中社会工作者的需求:专业教育和培训的机会》中报告了与体育社会工作者的定性研究。Brock Petroshius、Garcia Perez、Gross和Abrams在《色盲态度、同理心和羞耻:为白人学生进行反种族主义社会工作实践做准备》一书中报告了对白人MSW学生的横断面调查的分析,以评估种族知识和情绪之间的关系,作为反种族主义行为的预测因素。他们讨论了他们的研究结果对反种族主义社会工作教育的影响。Slay、Robinson和Rhodes在《全球大流行病中黑人女性社会工作教育工作者的力量共享视角》一书中提供了来自强大黑人女性(SBW)模式和韧性理论的共同视角,以描述她们在全球大流行病期间适应变化的能力,然后,德鲁在《黑人经历很重要:黑人教师与黑人管理者的经历反思》一书中提出了一项混合方法研究,以探索社会工作教师和有过黑人管理者监督经历的工作人员的经历,Jaggers和Garnigan在批判性种族理论框架内利用集体自传体方法,更好地了解黑人社会工作学生在白人占主导地位的机构中的反黑人种族主义经历。这项研究强调了对隐性和显性社会工作课程的重要发现和启示,以及减少黑人学生在这些背景下因反黑人种族主义而遭受的伤害和情感劳动的具体下一步措施。接下来,Thyberg讨论了批判性社会工作(CSW)作为解决社会工作中种族主义和压迫问题的框架,并在《为社会工作者做好反压迫实践的准备:评估批判性社会工作教育的作用》一书中报告了一项针对社会工作学生的批判性社会工作学习经历的调查。“接下来的两篇文章主要关注政治社会工作教育。Hylton、Lane、Smith、Ostrander和Powers的第一本《选民参与模式:为下一代社会工作者的政治实践做准备》描述并报告了对《2023年社会工作教育选民杂志》第59卷第2期291–293的评估结果https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2198958
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Education is a refereed professional journal concerned with education in social work, and social welfare. Its purpose is to serve as a forum for creative exchange on trends, innovations, and problems relevant to social work education at the undergraduate, masters", and postgraduate levels. JSWE is published three times a year, in winter (January 15), spring/summer (May 15), and fall (September 15). It is available by subscription and is free with CSWE membership.
期刊最新文献
Defending Discomfort: A Critical Social Work Case Against Trigger Warnings Teaching Note—Integrating Disability-Related Content Within the Interprofessional Education Curriculum: Opportunities and Lessons Learned Teaching Note—Antioppressive Pedagogy in Action: The Undergraduate Research Methods Course Considerations for Marginalized Fathers in Human Behavior and the Social Environment (HBSE) Courses: Insights for Social Work Educators and Students Research Note—Making Peer Review Evidence-Based: It’s Time to Open the “Black Box”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1