Populist but Pluralist? : Populist Attitudes and Preferences for Political Pluralism in Parliament and Government

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Parliamentary Affairs Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1093/PA/GSAB041/6333307
Victor Ellenbroek, M. Meijers, A. Krouwel
{"title":"Populist but Pluralist? : Populist Attitudes and Preferences for Political Pluralism in Parliament and Government","authors":"Victor Ellenbroek, M. Meijers, A. Krouwel","doi":"10.1093/PA/GSAB041/6333307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ideational approach to populism, populist politicians consider a politically pluralist parliament both as unnecessary and as an obstacle to the expression of the true people’s will in politics. It is however an open question whether citizens with high populist attitudes are just as negatively predisposed towards pluralism in parliament and coalition government: Thus far, evidence of a negative relationship between populist attitudes and preferences for pluralism in politics has been inconclusive. We asked ca 2.000 Dutch respondents – raked to be representative of the population – to draw up their ideal assembly and to select the parties that they wish to be part of coalition government. Results show that individuals who score high on the populist attitudes scale are not negatively predisposed towards the inclusion of many parties in parliament and coalition government. These results shed new light on the presumed incompatibility between populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy.","PeriodicalId":19790,"journal":{"name":"Parliamentary Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parliamentary Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/PA/GSAB041/6333307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the ideational approach to populism, populist politicians consider a politically pluralist parliament both as unnecessary and as an obstacle to the expression of the true people’s will in politics. It is however an open question whether citizens with high populist attitudes are just as negatively predisposed towards pluralism in parliament and coalition government: Thus far, evidence of a negative relationship between populist attitudes and preferences for pluralism in politics has been inconclusive. We asked ca 2.000 Dutch respondents – raked to be representative of the population – to draw up their ideal assembly and to select the parties that they wish to be part of coalition government. Results show that individuals who score high on the populist attitudes scale are not negatively predisposed towards the inclusion of many parties in parliament and coalition government. These results shed new light on the presumed incompatibility between populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义但多元主义?:民粹主义态度与议会和政府对政治多元主义的偏好
在民粹主义的概念方法中,民粹主义政客认为政治多元化的议会是不必要的,也是在政治中表达真正人民意愿的障碍。然而,具有高度民粹主义态度的公民在议会和联合政府中是否也同样倾向于多元主义,这是一个悬而未决的问题:到目前为止,民粹主义态度与政治多元主义偏好之间存在负面关系的证据还没有定论。我们询问了大约2000名荷兰受访者——他们被认为是人口的代表——制定他们理想的议会,并选择他们希望加入联合政府的政党。结果表明,在民粹主义态度量表上得分较高的人并不倾向于将多个政党纳入议会和联合政府。这些结果为民粹主义、多元主义和自由民主之间假定的不相容性提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parliamentary Affairs
Parliamentary Affairs POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Parliamentary Affairs is an established, peer-reviewed academic quarterly covering all the aspects of government and politics directly or indirectly connected with Parliament and parliamentary systems in Britain and throughout the world. The journal is published in partnership with the Hansard Society. The Society was created to promote parliamentary democracy throughout the world, a theme which is reflected in the pages of Parliamentary Affairs.
期刊最新文献
Cleaning Up UK Politics: What Would Better Lobbying Regulation Look Like? Big Little Election Lies: Cynical and Credulous Evaluations of Electoral Fraud Paralysed Governments: How Political Constraints Elicit Cabinet Termination What Do We Call an ‘MP’? On Categories of Thought in the Anthropology of Parliaments Beyond Institutional Adaptation: Legislative Europeanisation and Parliamentary Attention to the EU in the Hungarian Parliament
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1