The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1863519
L. V. van Zeelst, R. Derksen, C. Wijers, J. Hegeman, R. Berry, J. D. de Wilt, L. Strobbe
{"title":"The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators","authors":"L. V. van Zeelst, R. Derksen, C. Wijers, J. Hegeman, R. Berry, J. D. de Wilt, L. Strobbe","doi":"10.1155/2022/1863519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The rate of inpatient mastectomies remains high despite multiple studies reporting favourably on outpatient mastectomies. Outpatient mastectomies do not compromise quality of patient care and are more efficient than inpatient care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient mastectomy. Materials and Methods Implementation of an outpatient mastectomy program was evaluated in a retrospective study. All patients who underwent mastectomy between January 2019 and September 2021 were included. Results 213 patients were enrolled in the study: 62.4% (n = 133) outpatient mastectomies versus 37.6% (n = 80) inpatient mastectomies. A steady rise in outpatient mastectomies was observed over time. The second quarter of 2020, coinciding with the first COVID-19 wave, showed a peak in outpatient mastectomies. The only significant barrier to outpatient mastectomy proved to be bilateral mastectomy. Unplanned return to care was observed in 27.8% of the outpatient versus 36.3% of the inpatient mastectomies (P=0.198); the reason for unplanned return of care was similar in both groups. Conclusions Outpatient mastectomy is shown to be feasible and safe with a steady increase during the study period. A barrier to outpatient mastectomy was bilateral mastectomy. Incidence of unplanned return to care or complications did not differ significantly between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts.","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1863519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background The rate of inpatient mastectomies remains high despite multiple studies reporting favourably on outpatient mastectomies. Outpatient mastectomies do not compromise quality of patient care and are more efficient than inpatient care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient mastectomy. Materials and Methods Implementation of an outpatient mastectomy program was evaluated in a retrospective study. All patients who underwent mastectomy between January 2019 and September 2021 were included. Results 213 patients were enrolled in the study: 62.4% (n = 133) outpatient mastectomies versus 37.6% (n = 80) inpatient mastectomies. A steady rise in outpatient mastectomies was observed over time. The second quarter of 2020, coinciding with the first COVID-19 wave, showed a peak in outpatient mastectomies. The only significant barrier to outpatient mastectomy proved to be bilateral mastectomy. Unplanned return to care was observed in 27.8% of the outpatient versus 36.3% of the inpatient mastectomies (P=0.198); the reason for unplanned return of care was similar in both groups. Conclusions Outpatient mastectomy is shown to be feasible and safe with a steady increase during the study period. A barrier to outpatient mastectomy was bilateral mastectomy. Incidence of unplanned return to care or complications did not differ significantly between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19时代寻求门诊乳房切除术:障碍和促进因素
背景:住院乳房切除术的比率仍然很高,尽管多项研究报道了门诊乳房切除术的优势。门诊乳房切除术不影响患者护理质量,比住院护理更有效。本研究的目的是评估门诊乳房切除术的可行性。材料和方法在一项回顾性研究中评估门诊乳房切除术方案的实施情况。所有在2019年1月至2021年9月期间接受乳房切除术的患者都被纳入其中。结果213例患者纳入研究:62.4% (n = 133)为门诊乳房切除术,37.6% (n = 80)为住院乳房切除术。随着时间的推移,观察到门诊乳房切除术稳步上升。2020年第二季度,恰逢第一次COVID-19浪潮,门诊乳房切除术达到高峰。唯一的显著障碍门诊乳房切除术证明是双侧乳房切除术。27.8%的门诊患者和36.3%的住院乳房切除术患者出现计划外重返护理(P=0.198);两组患者意外返回护理的原因相似。结论门诊乳房切除术是可行和安全的,在研究期间乳房切除术稳步增加。双侧乳房切除术是门诊乳房切除术的障碍。门诊组和住院组的意外复诊或并发症发生率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1