Phylogenomics reveals within species diversification but incongruence with color phenotypes in widespread orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini)

IF 3.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Insect Systematics and Diversity Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/isd/ixad005
S. Sandoval-Arango, M. Branstetter, Carolina F. Cardoso, M. López-Uribe
{"title":"Phylogenomics reveals within species diversification but incongruence with color phenotypes in widespread orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini)","authors":"S. Sandoval-Arango, M. Branstetter, Carolina F. Cardoso, M. López-Uribe","doi":"10.1093/isd/ixad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coloration is an important phenotypic trait for taxonomic studies and has been widely used for identifying insect species and populations. However, coloration can be a poor diagnostic character for insect species that exhibit high polymorphism in this trait, which can lead to over-splitting of taxonomic units. In orchid bees, color variation has been interpreted by different taxonomists as either polymorphism associated with Müllerian mimicry complexes or diagnostic traits for species identification. Despite this uncertainty, integrative approaches that incorporate multiple independent datasets to test the validity of hair coloration as a character that identifies independent evolutionary units have not been used. Here, we use phylogenomic data from Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs) to explore whether color phenotypes in the widespread orchid bee species complexes Eulaema meriana and Eulaema bombiformis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) correspond to independent lineages or polymorphic trait variation within species. We find that lineages within both species are structured according to geography and that color morphs are generally unassociated with evolutionarily independent groups except for populations located in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. We conclude that there is compelling evidence that E. atleticana and E. niveofasciata are subspecies of E. meriana and E. bombiformis, respectively, and not different species as previously suggested. Therefore, we recognize Eulaema meriana atleticana comb. n. and Eulaema bombiformis niveofasciata comb. n. and discuss their morphological characteristics. We make recommendations on the use of color traits for orchid bee taxonomy and discuss the significance of subspecies as evolutionary units relevant for conservation efforts.","PeriodicalId":48498,"journal":{"name":"Insect Systematics and Diversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Systematics and Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixad005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coloration is an important phenotypic trait for taxonomic studies and has been widely used for identifying insect species and populations. However, coloration can be a poor diagnostic character for insect species that exhibit high polymorphism in this trait, which can lead to over-splitting of taxonomic units. In orchid bees, color variation has been interpreted by different taxonomists as either polymorphism associated with Müllerian mimicry complexes or diagnostic traits for species identification. Despite this uncertainty, integrative approaches that incorporate multiple independent datasets to test the validity of hair coloration as a character that identifies independent evolutionary units have not been used. Here, we use phylogenomic data from Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs) to explore whether color phenotypes in the widespread orchid bee species complexes Eulaema meriana and Eulaema bombiformis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) correspond to independent lineages or polymorphic trait variation within species. We find that lineages within both species are structured according to geography and that color morphs are generally unassociated with evolutionarily independent groups except for populations located in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. We conclude that there is compelling evidence that E. atleticana and E. niveofasciata are subspecies of E. meriana and E. bombiformis, respectively, and not different species as previously suggested. Therefore, we recognize Eulaema meriana atleticana comb. n. and Eulaema bombiformis niveofasciata comb. n. and discuss their morphological characteristics. We make recommendations on the use of color traits for orchid bee taxonomy and discuss the significance of subspecies as evolutionary units relevant for conservation efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统基因组学揭示了广泛分布的兰蜂在种内多样化但与颜色表型不一致(膜翅目:蜂科:蓝蜂)
颜色是分类研究中重要的表型性状,已广泛用于昆虫种类和种群的鉴定。然而,对于表现出高度多态性的昆虫物种,颜色可能是一个较差的诊断特征,这可能导致分类单位的过度分裂。在兰花蜂中,不同的分类学家将颜色变异解释为与勒氏拟态复合体相关的多态性或物种鉴定的诊断特征。尽管存在这种不确定性,但尚未使用整合多个独立数据集的综合方法来测试头发颜色作为识别独立进化单位的特征的有效性。本研究利用来自超保守元件(UCEs)的系统基因组数据,探讨了广泛分布的兰蜂物种复合体(膜翅目:蜂科:蜂科)的颜色表型是否对应于独立的谱系或物种内的多态性性状变异。我们发现,这两个物种的谱系都是根据地理构造的,除了位于巴西大西洋森林的种群外,颜色形态通常与进化上独立的种群无关。我们的结论是,有令人信服的证据表明,运动e.a atleticana和niveofasciata分别是meriana和bombiformis的亚种,而不是之前认为的不同物种。因此,我们认识到欧拉玛梅里亚纳竞技梳。n.和弹形Eulaema bombiformis niveofasciata梳子。讨论了它们的形态特征。在此基础上,提出了颜色性状在兰花蜂分类中的应用建议,并讨论了亚种作为进化单位对兰花蜂保护工作的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Webs of intrigue: museum genomics elucidate relationships of the marronoid spider clade (Araneae) Exploring the mitogenomes of Batracomorphus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Iassinae): new insights from structural diversity and phylogenomic analyses Skimming the skaters: genome skimming improves phylogenetic resolution of Halobatinae (Hemiptera: Gerridae) Twelve more bulky genomes in the Polyneoptera: characterizing the Order Embioptera The parasitic louse genus Myrsidea (Amblycera: Menoponidae): a comprehensive review and world checklist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1