Who is healthier? A meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO personality domains and health outcomes

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1177/08902070231174574
J. Pletzer, Isabel Thielmann, Ingo Zettler
{"title":"Who is healthier? A meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO personality domains and health outcomes","authors":"J. Pletzer, Isabel Thielmann, Ingo Zettler","doi":"10.1177/08902070231174574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers and practitioners have long been interested in the relations of basic personality domains with health. Whereas previous meta-analyses have focused on the Big Five traits, we provide the first meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO domains, as assessed by HEXACO Personality Inventories, and various health outcomes ( k = 276, N = 92,319). In general, relations of the HEXACO domains were strongest with mental health, followed by health behavior, whereas relations with physical health outcomes were weak and largely non-significant. All HEXACO domains were significantly linked to mental health and health behavior outcomes. Extraversion exhibited the strongest correlation with mental health ([Formula: see text] = .48), whereas Honesty-Humility ([Formula: see text] = .31), Agreeableness versus Anger ([Formula: see text] = .25), and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .31) were most predictive of health behavior. Physical health was only significantly associated with Emotionality ([Formula: see text] = −.14) and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .10). Honesty-Humility explained incremental variance over the Big Five in several health behavior outcomes, whereas it had little incremental validity for mental and physical health outcomes. Finally, comparing the variance that the HEXACO and the Big Five domains explained in specific health outcomes demonstrated that each personality model occasionally exhibited superior criterion-related validity. Hence, the choice of the more useful personality model could be outcome-dependent.","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231174574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners have long been interested in the relations of basic personality domains with health. Whereas previous meta-analyses have focused on the Big Five traits, we provide the first meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO domains, as assessed by HEXACO Personality Inventories, and various health outcomes ( k = 276, N = 92,319). In general, relations of the HEXACO domains were strongest with mental health, followed by health behavior, whereas relations with physical health outcomes were weak and largely non-significant. All HEXACO domains were significantly linked to mental health and health behavior outcomes. Extraversion exhibited the strongest correlation with mental health ([Formula: see text] = .48), whereas Honesty-Humility ([Formula: see text] = .31), Agreeableness versus Anger ([Formula: see text] = .25), and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .31) were most predictive of health behavior. Physical health was only significantly associated with Emotionality ([Formula: see text] = −.14) and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .10). Honesty-Humility explained incremental variance over the Big Five in several health behavior outcomes, whereas it had little incremental validity for mental and physical health outcomes. Finally, comparing the variance that the HEXACO and the Big Five domains explained in specific health outcomes demonstrated that each personality model occasionally exhibited superior criterion-related validity. Hence, the choice of the more useful personality model could be outcome-dependent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁更健康?HEXACO人格领域与健康结果关系的荟萃分析
研究人员和实践者长期以来一直对基本人格域与健康的关系感兴趣。鉴于之前的荟萃分析侧重于五大特征,我们首次对HEXACO人格量表评估的HEXACO域与各种健康结果之间的关系进行了荟萃分析(k = 276, N = 92,319)。总的来说,HEXACO结构域与心理健康的关系最强,其次是健康行为,而与身体健康结果的关系较弱,基本上不显著。所有HEXACO结构域都与心理健康和健康行为结果显著相关。外向性与心理健康表现出最强的相关性([公式:见文]= .48),而诚实-谦卑([公式:见文]= .31)、亲和性与愤怒([公式:见文]= .25)和责任心([公式:见文]= .31)最能预测健康行为。身体健康仅与情绪性([公式:见文]= - 0.14)和责任心([公式:见文]= 0.10)显著相关。诚实-谦卑解释了五大因素在几个健康行为结果上的增量方差,而它在心理和身体健康结果上的增量有效性很小。最后,比较HEXACO和大五域在特定健康结果中解释的差异表明,每个人格模型偶尔表现出更高的标准相关效度。因此,对更有用的人格模型的选择可能取决于结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
期刊最新文献
From theory to research: Interpretational guidelines, statistical guidance, and a shiny app for the model of excellencism and perfectionism The complexity of the pursuit of happiness is associated with the success of well-being related behaviors in everyday life Personality is (so much) more than just self-reported Big Five traits My willpower belief and yours: Investigating dyadic associations between willpower beliefs, social support, and relationship satisfaction in couples Between- and within-person longitudinal associations between personality traits and social support across relationships during older adulthood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1