PATRVM VESTIGIA SEQVENS THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF AUGUSTINE'S EXEGESIS OF EPH. 3:17–18 IN THE VENERABLE BEDE'S COLLECTIO EX OPVSCVLIS SANCTI AVGVSTINI IN EPISTVLAS PAVLI APOSTOLI

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES TRADITIO-STUDIES IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL HISTORY THOUGHT AND RELIGION Pub Date : 2017-11-21 DOI:10.1017/tdo.2017.9
Nicolas De Maeyer, A. Dupont
{"title":"PATRVM VESTIGIA SEQVENS THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF AUGUSTINE'S EXEGESIS OF EPH. 3:17–18 IN THE VENERABLE BEDE'S COLLECTIO EX OPVSCVLIS SANCTI AVGVSTINI IN EPISTVLAS PAVLI APOSTOLI","authors":"Nicolas De Maeyer, A. Dupont","doi":"10.1017/tdo.2017.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Collectio ex opusculis sancti Augustini in epistulas Pauli apostoli is an exegetical commentary on the Pauline letters that consists of 457 fragments from the works of Augustine of Hippo. The Collectio was compiled by the Northumbrian scholar Beda Venerabilis (672/73–735), whose biblical commentaries heavily rely on patristic exegesis and theology, and, as such, function as an important mediator between patristic and medieval exegesis and theology. Though many scholars have stressed the importance of the Collectio for the study of the transmission and reception of Augustine's writings and thinking in Anglo-Saxon England, the commentary has never been edited nor have its contents been thoroughly studied. The following contribution offers the first detailed study of the Collectio’s contents by analysing the ways in which Bede presents Augustine's Pauline exegesis in his own commentary on Paul's letters. Specifically, this article will study Bede's compilation methods by means of a close analysis of one of the Collectio’s fragments, fr. 315, which offers an exegetical commentary of Eph. 3:17–18. By studying the textual channels through which Bede had access to Augustine's writings as well as by considering other passages in Bede's biblical commentaries that discuss Eph. 3:17–18, this contribution seeks to demonstrate how Bede uses, adapts, and presents Augustine's exegesis of this pericope.","PeriodicalId":44907,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIO-STUDIES IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL HISTORY THOUGHT AND RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/tdo.2017.9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRADITIO-STUDIES IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL HISTORY THOUGHT AND RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/tdo.2017.9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Collectio ex opusculis sancti Augustini in epistulas Pauli apostoli is an exegetical commentary on the Pauline letters that consists of 457 fragments from the works of Augustine of Hippo. The Collectio was compiled by the Northumbrian scholar Beda Venerabilis (672/73–735), whose biblical commentaries heavily rely on patristic exegesis and theology, and, as such, function as an important mediator between patristic and medieval exegesis and theology. Though many scholars have stressed the importance of the Collectio for the study of the transmission and reception of Augustine's writings and thinking in Anglo-Saxon England, the commentary has never been edited nor have its contents been thoroughly studied. The following contribution offers the first detailed study of the Collectio’s contents by analysing the ways in which Bede presents Augustine's Pauline exegesis in his own commentary on Paul's letters. Specifically, this article will study Bede's compilation methods by means of a close analysis of one of the Collectio’s fragments, fr. 315, which offers an exegetical commentary of Eph. 3:17–18. By studying the textual channels through which Bede had access to Augustine's writings as well as by considering other passages in Bede's biblical commentaries that discuss Eph. 3:17–18, this contribution seeks to demonstrate how Bede uses, adapts, and presents Augustine's exegesis of this pericope.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PATRVM VESTIGIA SEQVENS传播和接受奥古斯丁对EPH的注释。3:17–18在德高望重的贝德的收藏中
《圣奥古斯丁书信集》是对波林书信的训释评论,由希波的奥古斯丁作品中的457个片段组成。该文集由诺森布里亚学者Beda Venerabilis(672/73-735)编撰,其圣经评注在很大程度上依赖于父系注释和神学,因此,它是父系和中世纪注释与神学之间的重要媒介。尽管许多学者强调了《文集》对于研究奥古斯丁的著作和思想在盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰的传播和接受的重要性,但该评论从未经过编辑,其内容也没有得到彻底的研究。以下贡献通过分析贝德在他自己对保罗信件的评论中介绍奥古斯丁的波林注释的方式,首次对收藏品的内容进行了详细研究。具体而言,本文将通过对《埃弗集》第315卷的一个片段的仔细分析来研究贝德的编纂方法,该片段提供了埃弗的训释评论。3:17–18.通过研究贝德接触奥古斯丁著作的文本渠道,以及考虑贝德圣经评论中讨论以弗的其他段落。3:17–18,这篇文章试图证明贝德是如何使用、改编和呈现奥古斯丁对这一佩里科的注释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The TRADITIO Network has now been furnishing information about all facets of traditional Roman Catholicism, answering questions both privately and publicly, for over 13 years now, longer than any other traditional site on the Internet. When we started, even the Vatican site didn"t exist! We wish that we could show you all of the personal letters we have received from troubled souls who have found here clear, traditional, and honest answers to their questions, free of organizational bias. Thousands of these have reverted or converted to the traditional Roman Catholic Faith as a result.
期刊最新文献
PROPHECY, ESCHATOLOGY, GLOBAL NETWORKS, AND THE CRUSADES, FROM HATTIN TO FREDERICK II PRINCIPIA ON THE SENTENCES IN THE FACULTY OF THEOLOGY OF BOLOGNA: THE CASE OF AUGUSTINUS FAVARONI OF ROME, OESA (†1443) GRIEF, GRIEVING, AND LOSS IN HIGH MEDIEVAL HISTORICAL THOUGHT THE WRITINGS OF NICOLE ORESME: A SYSTEMATIC INVENTORY WEALTH AND MATERIAL GOODS IN MEDIEVAL ITALIAN CIVIC HISTORIOGRAPHY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1