Hegel and Wittgenstein

Q4 Arts and Humanities Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.36576/2660-9509.49.89
J. Mácha
{"title":"Hegel and Wittgenstein","authors":"J. Mácha","doi":"10.36576/2660-9509.49.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that Hegel and Wittgenstein, each in their own specific way, used the idea of God at the beginning of creation as a complex analogy for other kinds of beginning, most notably the beginning of philosophical thought. Hegel’s Logic describes God’s mind before the creation of the world, i.e. God’s pure thinking. For a philosopher, beginning afresh means resolving to consider this kind of abstraction from the existence of the world. Wittgenstein, by contrast, says that the idea of a creator of the world does not explain anything. It marks the terminus ad quem of asking for explanations; we must not ask further who created the creator of the world. Wittgenstein generalizes this for any kind of reasoning: “Explanations come to an end somewhere.” (PhilosophicalInvestigations: §1) Any sort of explanation must eventually arrive at its terminus ad quem, which means only that any kind of reasoning must have its logical beginning.","PeriodicalId":37413,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9509.49.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I argue that Hegel and Wittgenstein, each in their own specific way, used the idea of God at the beginning of creation as a complex analogy for other kinds of beginning, most notably the beginning of philosophical thought. Hegel’s Logic describes God’s mind before the creation of the world, i.e. God’s pure thinking. For a philosopher, beginning afresh means resolving to consider this kind of abstraction from the existence of the world. Wittgenstein, by contrast, says that the idea of a creator of the world does not explain anything. It marks the terminus ad quem of asking for explanations; we must not ask further who created the creator of the world. Wittgenstein generalizes this for any kind of reasoning: “Explanations come to an end somewhere.” (PhilosophicalInvestigations: §1) Any sort of explanation must eventually arrive at its terminus ad quem, which means only that any kind of reasoning must have its logical beginning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑格尔和维特根斯坦
我认为,黑格尔和维特根斯坦都以自己独特的方式,在创造之初使用了上帝的概念,作为对其他类型的开始的复杂类比,尤其是哲学思想的开始。黑格尔的《逻辑学》描述了上帝在创造世界之前的心智,即上帝的纯粹思维。对于哲学家来说,重新开始意味着决心从世界的存在中思考这种抽象。相比之下,维特根斯坦说,世界创造者的想法并不能解释任何事情。它标志着要求解释的终点;我们不能再追问是谁创造了世界的创造者。维特根斯坦把这一点推广到任何一种推理中:“解释在某个地方结束。”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia
Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, publicación editada por la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, es una Revista científica de investigación filosófica a cargo de la Facultad de Filosofía de la mencionada Universidad. Se fundó en 1974, y se viene editando desde entonces de forma ininterrumpida, con una periodicidad anual. Pensada para el ámbito académico, publica preferentemente a profesores y doctores en filosofía, sin excluir a jóvenes investigadores que presenten un trabajo de calidad notable. Consta de tres secciones: Estudios originales (Artículos), Notas Criticas y Reseñas.
期刊最新文献
nuevo decisionismo político How to conduct research into history by assembling certainties Emil Cioran Idea de persona en X. Zubiri Persona
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1