Networks and Institutionalization: A Neo-structural Approach

E. Lazega
{"title":"Networks and Institutionalization: A Neo-structural Approach","authors":"E. Lazega","doi":"10.21307/CONNECTIONS-2017-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is the text prepared for the keynote address of the EUSN 2017 conference in Mainz, Germany. A short presentation of concepts reflects in part the foundations of neo-structural sociology (NSS) and its use of social and organisational network analyses, combined with other methodologies, to better understand the roles of structure and culture in individual and collective agency. The presentation shows how NSS accounts for institutional change by focusing on the importance of combined relational infrastructures and rhetorics. Specific characteristics of institutional entrepreneurs who punch above their weight in institutionalization processes are introduced for that purpose, particularly the importance of multi-status oligarchs, status heterogeneity, high-status inconsistencies, collegial oligarchies, conflicts of interests and rhetorics of relative/false sacrifice. Two empirical examples illustrate this approach. The first case focuses on a network study of the Commercial Court of Paris, a 450-year-old judicial institution. The second case focuses on a network study of a field-configuring event (the so-called Venice Forum) lobbying for the emergence of a new European jurisdiction, the Unified Patent Court, and its attempt to create a common intellectual property regime for the continent. For sociologists, both examples involve “studying up”: they are cases of public/private joint regulation of markets bringing together these ingredients of institutionalization. The conclusion suggests future lines of research that NSS opens for the study of institutionalization, in particular using the dynamics of multi-level networks. One of the main issues raised by this approach is its contribution to the study of democratic deficits in a period of intense institutional change in Europe.","PeriodicalId":88856,"journal":{"name":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"37 1","pages":"7 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/CONNECTIONS-2017-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract This paper is the text prepared for the keynote address of the EUSN 2017 conference in Mainz, Germany. A short presentation of concepts reflects in part the foundations of neo-structural sociology (NSS) and its use of social and organisational network analyses, combined with other methodologies, to better understand the roles of structure and culture in individual and collective agency. The presentation shows how NSS accounts for institutional change by focusing on the importance of combined relational infrastructures and rhetorics. Specific characteristics of institutional entrepreneurs who punch above their weight in institutionalization processes are introduced for that purpose, particularly the importance of multi-status oligarchs, status heterogeneity, high-status inconsistencies, collegial oligarchies, conflicts of interests and rhetorics of relative/false sacrifice. Two empirical examples illustrate this approach. The first case focuses on a network study of the Commercial Court of Paris, a 450-year-old judicial institution. The second case focuses on a network study of a field-configuring event (the so-called Venice Forum) lobbying for the emergence of a new European jurisdiction, the Unified Patent Court, and its attempt to create a common intellectual property regime for the continent. For sociologists, both examples involve “studying up”: they are cases of public/private joint regulation of markets bringing together these ingredients of institutionalization. The conclusion suggests future lines of research that NSS opens for the study of institutionalization, in particular using the dynamics of multi-level networks. One of the main issues raised by this approach is its contribution to the study of democratic deficits in a period of intense institutional change in Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络与制度化:一种新结构的方法
本文是为德国美因茨召开的2017年EUSN会议主题演讲准备的文本。一个简短的概念展示部分反映了新结构社会学(NSS)的基础及其对社会和组织网络分析的使用,结合其他方法,以更好地理解结构和文化在个人和集体代理中的作用。该演讲展示了NSS如何通过关注组合关系基础设施和修辞的重要性来解释制度变化。为此,本文介绍了在制度化过程中发挥重要作用的机构企业家的具体特征,特别是多地位寡头、地位异质性、高地位不一致性、合议寡头、利益冲突和相对/虚假牺牲修辞的重要性。两个实证例子说明了这种方法。第一个案例侧重于对巴黎商事法庭的网络研究,这是一个有着450年历史的司法机构。第二个案例集中在一个领域配置事件(所谓的威尼斯论坛)的网络研究上,该事件游说建立一个新的欧洲司法管辖区,即统一专利法院,并试图为欧洲大陆建立一个共同的知识产权制度。对于社会学家来说,这两个例子都涉及“研究”:它们是公共/私人联合监管市场的案例,将这些制度化的要素结合在一起。结论表明,NSS为制度化研究开辟了未来的研究方向,特别是利用多层次网络的动态。这种方法提出的一个主要问题是,它有助于研究欧洲剧烈制度变革时期的民主赤字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with Retirement: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis with Social Network Analysis On the Effect of Reciprocal Dyadic Relations on the Share of Lexical Practices Men Think they Know More about Networks ScriptNet: An integrated criminological-network analysis tool Isolation, cohesion and contingent network effects: the case of school attachment and engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1