Arriving at a question: Retrospections on post-qualitative slow research with children

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Global Studies of Childhood Pub Date : 2023-06-17 DOI:10.1177/20436106231179605
Tanushree Biswas, Enaya Mubasher
{"title":"Arriving at a question: Retrospections on post-qualitative slow research with children","authors":"Tanushree Biswas, Enaya Mubasher","doi":"10.1177/20436106231179605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents retrospections on selected methodological explications of a slow research process with child citizens living in the urban, Sør-Trondelag region of Norway. The process was akin to what Gallacher and Gallagher have termed “muddling through” and was about primarily about ‘arriving at, asking and then attempting to answer the question: What is the scope for the philosophical blossoming of adults when they enter children’s playfully constructed worlds as guests? Particularly, I engage with a post-empirical phase colloquium with one of my main co-explorers, Enaya Mubasher, in the Child and Youth Seminar at the Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Trondheim (Norway) in March 2017. Enaya, a (primary school student at that time) and I first met in 2012 during our commonly shared time in a kindergarten in Trondheim, where I was a kindergarten assistant for Enaya’s group and played with Enaya as part of my job. While I did not first meet Enaya as a “research participant,” our relationship evolved into a co-explorer dynamic after I had stopped working in the kindergarten. Playing with Enaya, included among other efforts, consistently playing with my understanding of what it means to be “me” as an independent “I,” and with it what was expected of me as an (adult) researcher within adult-centric institutional framings. The retrospections accentuate relationality as a defining dimension of rationality in research processes to advance conversations at the intersections of postqualitative and slow research with children from a childist standpoint.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"13 1","pages":"276 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106231179605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents retrospections on selected methodological explications of a slow research process with child citizens living in the urban, Sør-Trondelag region of Norway. The process was akin to what Gallacher and Gallagher have termed “muddling through” and was about primarily about ‘arriving at, asking and then attempting to answer the question: What is the scope for the philosophical blossoming of adults when they enter children’s playfully constructed worlds as guests? Particularly, I engage with a post-empirical phase colloquium with one of my main co-explorers, Enaya Mubasher, in the Child and Youth Seminar at the Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Trondheim (Norway) in March 2017. Enaya, a (primary school student at that time) and I first met in 2012 during our commonly shared time in a kindergarten in Trondheim, where I was a kindergarten assistant for Enaya’s group and played with Enaya as part of my job. While I did not first meet Enaya as a “research participant,” our relationship evolved into a co-explorer dynamic after I had stopped working in the kindergarten. Playing with Enaya, included among other efforts, consistently playing with my understanding of what it means to be “me” as an independent “I,” and with it what was expected of me as an (adult) researcher within adult-centric institutional framings. The retrospections accentuate relationality as a defining dimension of rationality in research processes to advance conversations at the intersections of postqualitative and slow research with children from a childist standpoint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
得出一个问题:对儿童定性后缓慢研究的回顾
本文回顾了对挪威Sør-Trondelag地区城市儿童公民的缓慢研究过程的选择方法解释。这个过程类似于加拉赫和加拉格尔所说的“混日子”,主要是关于“到达,询问,然后试图回答这个问题:当成年人作为客人进入孩子们充满乐趣的世界时,他们的哲学之花的范围是什么?”特别是,2017年3月,在特隆赫姆大学(挪威)教育和终身学习系的儿童和青年研讨会上,我与我的主要合作探索者之一Enaya Mubasher参加了一个后经验阶段的研讨会。我和Enaya(当时还是小学生)第一次见面是在2012年,当时我们在特隆赫姆的一所幼儿园里,我是Enaya小组的幼儿园助理,和Enaya一起玩耍是我工作的一部分。虽然我第一次见到Enaya并不是作为“研究参与者”,但在我停止在幼儿园工作后,我们的关系发展成了一种共同探索的动力。和Enaya一起玩,包括其他的努力,一直在玩我对“我”作为一个独立的“我”意味着什么的理解,以及在以成人为中心的机构框架中,作为一个(成人)研究者,我被期望什么。回顾强调了关系作为研究过程中理性的一个定义维度,从儿童的角度出发,在定性后和缓慢研究与儿童的交叉点上推进对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Studies of Childhood
Global Studies of Childhood Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Decolonizing western science education and knowledge in early childhood: Rethinking natural hazards and disasters framework through indigenous ‘ecology of knowledges’ in Kenya Book review: Seen and not heard: Why children’s voices matter ‘The big crossroad’: Parenting, risk and educational transitions in Singapore Book review: A Gottlieb, The afterlife is where we come from Globalisation in and of Nordic early childhood education: Tensions between the local and the global
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1