“To Save the Benefit of the Act of Parliamt”: Mapping an Early American Copyright

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY Law and History Review Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/S0738248022000475
Nora Slonimsky
{"title":"“To Save the Benefit of the Act of Parliamt”: Mapping an Early American Copyright","authors":"Nora Slonimsky","doi":"10.1017/S0738248022000475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the reach of Parliament was hotly contested in eighteenth-century America, there was one Act in particular that proved especially complicated for geographer Lewis Evans and his daughter, Amelia Evans Barry. Believing that English copyright law did not extend to Philadelphia in the 1750s, Lewis Evans drew on a variety of tools and circumstances to, in essence, craft his own interpretation of what benefits of copyright he and his family could obtain. Rather than formal copyright disputes involving legal documentation, this particular episode focused on other aspects of A General Map of the Middle British Colonies, In America. Inheriting the copyright to A General Map from her father, Amelia Evans Barry in turn sought to enforce and recreate a claim to literary labor over subsequent decades. The result was a unique story of copyright’s origins in America that also underscored the challenge of enforcing structures of power and perceptions of authority, particularly over geographic media, in the British empire. The boundaries of jurisdiction and sovereignty, the same ones depicted in A General Map, were that much more difficult to enforce when it came to intellectual property.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"625 - 654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248022000475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While the reach of Parliament was hotly contested in eighteenth-century America, there was one Act in particular that proved especially complicated for geographer Lewis Evans and his daughter, Amelia Evans Barry. Believing that English copyright law did not extend to Philadelphia in the 1750s, Lewis Evans drew on a variety of tools and circumstances to, in essence, craft his own interpretation of what benefits of copyright he and his family could obtain. Rather than formal copyright disputes involving legal documentation, this particular episode focused on other aspects of A General Map of the Middle British Colonies, In America. Inheriting the copyright to A General Map from her father, Amelia Evans Barry in turn sought to enforce and recreate a claim to literary labor over subsequent decades. The result was a unique story of copyright’s origins in America that also underscored the challenge of enforcing structures of power and perceptions of authority, particularly over geographic media, in the British empire. The boundaries of jurisdiction and sovereignty, the same ones depicted in A General Map, were that much more difficult to enforce when it came to intellectual property.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“拯救国会法案的利益”:描绘早期美国版权
在18世纪的美国,国会的权力范围受到了激烈的争论,有一项法案对地理学家刘易斯·埃文斯和他的女儿阿米莉亚·埃文斯·巴里来说尤其复杂。刘易斯·埃文斯认为英国版权法并没有延伸到18世纪50年代的费城,他利用各种工具和情况,从本质上解释了他和他的家人可以从版权中获得什么好处。这一集没有涉及法律文件的正式版权纠纷,而是聚焦于《美国中部英国殖民地总图》的其他方面。阿米莉亚·埃文斯·巴里从父亲那里继承了《通用地图》的版权,在随后的几十年里,她又试图强制执行和重建对文学劳动的要求。其结果是一个关于美国版权起源的独特故事,也突显了在大英帝国执行权力结构和权威观念的挑战,尤其是在地理媒体方面。当涉及到知识产权时,管辖权和主权的界限,就像《总地图》中描述的那样,要执行起来要困难得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and History Review (LHR), America"s leading legal history journal, encompasses American, European, and ancient legal history issues. The journal"s purpose is to further research in the fields of the social history of law and the history of legal ideas and institutions. LHR features articles, essays, commentaries by international authorities, and reviews of important books on legal history. American Society for Legal History
期刊最新文献
“Lost in Translation”: Extraterritoriality, Subjecthood, and Subjectivity in the Anglo–Yemeni Treaty of 1821 Witnesses for the State: Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law The Cartojuridism of the British East India Company The Abolition of Slavery in Africa's Legal Histories The Sultans of Zanzibar and the Abolition of Slavery in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1