A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in E-government based on value positions

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101837
Bettina Distel , Ida Lindgren
{"title":"A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in E-government based on value positions","authors":"Bettina Distel ,&nbsp;Ida Lindgren","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Citizens are oftentimes the central unit of analysis in e-government research and treated as one of the stakeholders receiving the most benefits from public sector digitalization. Still, they are mostly described in general terms, and it remains unclear what roles they can assume in relation to e-government. Different understandings of the citizens' role in e-government may impact research, because they entail different axioms mainly in relation to the technological frame for e-government but also for the citizens' relationship to public sector organizations in general. The aim of this article is to investigate and conceptualize the citizens' role in e-government based on public value positions. We depart from Rose et al.'s (2015) framework of value positions for managing e-government. After reviewing and analyzing extensive research on e-government, we use this framework to contribute a clarification of the citizens' role in each value position. Our analysis shows that the ideal citizen is conceptualized differently across the four value positions; ranging from an external entity that should service themselves using digital self-services, to an engaged agent that should be actively involved in policy making and service delivery. In addition to this new perspective on the citizens' role in e-government, we contribute with an extension of the public value positions framework. The extended framework presented in this article makes these differences visible and we discuss consequences of the citizens' role in e-government for other dimensions of the framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 101837"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Citizens are oftentimes the central unit of analysis in e-government research and treated as one of the stakeholders receiving the most benefits from public sector digitalization. Still, they are mostly described in general terms, and it remains unclear what roles they can assume in relation to e-government. Different understandings of the citizens' role in e-government may impact research, because they entail different axioms mainly in relation to the technological frame for e-government but also for the citizens' relationship to public sector organizations in general. The aim of this article is to investigate and conceptualize the citizens' role in e-government based on public value positions. We depart from Rose et al.'s (2015) framework of value positions for managing e-government. After reviewing and analyzing extensive research on e-government, we use this framework to contribute a clarification of the citizens' role in each value position. Our analysis shows that the ideal citizen is conceptualized differently across the four value positions; ranging from an external entity that should service themselves using digital self-services, to an engaged agent that should be actively involved in policy making and service delivery. In addition to this new perspective on the citizens' role in e-government, we contribute with an extension of the public value positions framework. The extended framework presented in this article makes these differences visible and we discuss consequences of the citizens' role in e-government for other dimensions of the framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视角问题:基于价值立场对电子政务中公民角色的概念化
公民通常是电子政务研究的中心分析单位,并被视为从公共部门数字化中获益最多的利益相关者之一。尽管如此,它们大多被笼统地描述,它们在电子政务中可以扮演什么角色仍不清楚。对公民在电子政务中的作用的不同理解可能会影响研究,因为它们需要不同的公理,主要涉及电子政务的技术框架,以及公民与公共部门组织的关系。本文的目的是在公共价值立场的基础上对电子政务中的公民角色进行考察和界定。我们背离Rose et al.(2015)管理电子政务的价值立场框架。在回顾和分析了关于电子政务的广泛研究之后,我们使用这个框架来澄清公民在每个价值立场中的角色。我们的分析表明,理想公民的概念在四个价值立场上是不同的;从应该使用数字自助服务为自己服务的外部实体,到应该积极参与政策制定和服务提供的敬业代理。除了这个关于公民在电子政务中的角色的新视角之外,我们还扩展了公共价值立场框架。本文中提出的扩展框架使这些差异可见,我们讨论了公民在电子政务中的角色对框架的其他维度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1