Camille Brod , Nicole Groth , Macaela Rudeck , Ramin Artang , Matthew Rioux , Catherine Benziger
{"title":"Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting","authors":"Camille Brod , Nicole Groth , Macaela Rudeck , Ramin Artang , Matthew Rioux , Catherine Benziger","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, <em>p</em> = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, <em>p</em> < 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p<0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (<1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036422000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods
Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.
Results
Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%, p < 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p<0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use (p < 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (<1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.
Conclusions
The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.
2019年ACC/AHA/HRS指南将直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)作为治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)的一线治疗方法,而不是华法林。方法纳入2019年10月1日至2020年7月12日期间门诊非瓣膜性房颤或心房扑动患者。高危房颤定义为男性CHA2DS2-VASc评分≥2,女性≥3。患者被分为:华法林,DOAC,或无口服抗凝(OAC)。计算心房出血评分。在2020年3月5日至4月16日期间通过REDCap完成了一项评估抗凝知识和障碍的提供者调查。结果12014例房颤患者中,8032例为高危人群(平均年龄75.9±9.8岁;57.5%的男性)。≥75岁的4619例(57.1%),63.4%为农村居民。指南发表前后接受抗凝治疗的受试者人数无显著差异(75.6% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.79)。华法林的使用在1年内下降了2.3%(39.3%至37.0%),而DOACs增加了2.4%(36.2%至38.7%),p <两者均为0.001)。1岁时,年龄、男性、CHA2DS2-VASc评分4-6、高血压、脑卒中、心内科会诊OAC处方增加(p < 0.05)。血管疾病、高危心房出血、肾脏疾病、既往出血和左心耳闭塞与OAC使用减少相关(p <0.05)。左心耳闭塞器使用率低(1%)。在一项调查中,大多数提供者指出出血风险(35.1%)和费用(25.0%)是使用DOAC的最大障碍。随着时间的推移,新指南导致DOACs略有增加。农村地区使用DOAC存在重大障碍;四分之一的高危房颤患者仍未接受OAC治疗。