{"title":"The results of arthroscopic treatment for talus osteochondral lesions","authors":"Azad Yıldırım","doi":"10.4328/JCAM.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5919 Received: 04.06.2018 Accepted: 08.10.2018 Published Online: 09.10.2018 Printed: 01.05.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(3): 359-64 Corresponding Author: Azad Yıldırım Diyarlife Dağ Kapı, Diyarbakır Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. E-Mail: yildirimazad@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7058-4476 Abstract Aim: Our aim is to share the mid-term results of debritment and marrow bone stimulation proccess in patients with talus OCD who did not respond to the conservative treatment. Material and Method: The patients with talus osteochondritis dissecans weretreated by arthroscopic debridement; and bone marrow stimulation was performed with Kwire. Twenty-sixof them formed the primary and 15 of them formed the revision group. Clinical assessment included the Ogilvie-Harris score and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. The defects were classified according to the system of Berndt and Harty. The lesion side, symptom time, trauma history, age-related complication, Ogilvie-Harris and AOFAS scores, follow-up period, and well-being condition of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 41 patients, 25 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 34.3 years (range 19-62), were included in the present study. Follow-up ranged from 23-73 month (mean 34,3). The individual analysis results showed that the pre-operative AOFAS scores were significantly different between the primary and the revision groups, while post-operative scores were not significantly different between the primary and therevision groups. For the whole group, the AOFAS skore was excellent in 9 patients, good in 25, fair in 6 and poor in one. In the primary group the AOFAS scores were good in 14 (54%), fair in four (15) and excellent in eight (31) patients, while in the revision group they were good in eleven (73%), fair in two (13%) and poor in one (7%) patient. The combined good and excellent scores were 85% for the primary group and 80% for the revision group. The mean AOFAS AHS score at the 12th month was 88.2 in the primary group and 82.8 in the revision group. Discussion: Arthroscopic curettage and bone marrow stimulating process is a viable method and recommended for both primary and revision treatment of an osteochonditis dissecans of the talus.","PeriodicalId":44485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5919 Received: 04.06.2018 Accepted: 08.10.2018 Published Online: 09.10.2018 Printed: 01.05.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(3): 359-64 Corresponding Author: Azad Yıldırım Diyarlife Dağ Kapı, Diyarbakır Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. E-Mail: yildirimazad@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7058-4476 Abstract Aim: Our aim is to share the mid-term results of debritment and marrow bone stimulation proccess in patients with talus OCD who did not respond to the conservative treatment. Material and Method: The patients with talus osteochondritis dissecans weretreated by arthroscopic debridement; and bone marrow stimulation was performed with Kwire. Twenty-sixof them formed the primary and 15 of them formed the revision group. Clinical assessment included the Ogilvie-Harris score and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. The defects were classified according to the system of Berndt and Harty. The lesion side, symptom time, trauma history, age-related complication, Ogilvie-Harris and AOFAS scores, follow-up period, and well-being condition of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 41 patients, 25 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 34.3 years (range 19-62), were included in the present study. Follow-up ranged from 23-73 month (mean 34,3). The individual analysis results showed that the pre-operative AOFAS scores were significantly different between the primary and the revision groups, while post-operative scores were not significantly different between the primary and therevision groups. For the whole group, the AOFAS skore was excellent in 9 patients, good in 25, fair in 6 and poor in one. In the primary group the AOFAS scores were good in 14 (54%), fair in four (15) and excellent in eight (31) patients, while in the revision group they were good in eleven (73%), fair in two (13%) and poor in one (7%) patient. The combined good and excellent scores were 85% for the primary group and 80% for the revision group. The mean AOFAS AHS score at the 12th month was 88.2 in the primary group and 82.8 in the revision group. Discussion: Arthroscopic curettage and bone marrow stimulating process is a viable method and recommended for both primary and revision treatment of an osteochonditis dissecans of the talus.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine is an international open-access journal containing peer-reviewed high-quality articles on clinical medicine in the areas of all research study types, reviews, and case reports. Our journal has become an important platform with the help of language support services, which make it easier for writers who have English as their second language to share their clinical experiences with the world.