The results of arthroscopic treatment for talus osteochondral lesions

Azad Yıldırım
{"title":"The results of arthroscopic treatment for talus osteochondral lesions","authors":"Azad Yıldırım","doi":"10.4328/JCAM.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5919 Received: 04.06.2018 Accepted: 08.10.2018 Published Online: 09.10.2018 Printed: 01.05.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(3): 359-64 Corresponding Author: Azad Yıldırım Diyarlife Dağ Kapı, Diyarbakır Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. E-Mail: yildirimazad@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7058-4476 Abstract Aim: Our aim is to share the mid-term results of debritment and marrow bone stimulation proccess in patients with talus OCD who did not respond to the conservative treatment. Material and Method: The patients with talus osteochondritis dissecans weretreated by arthroscopic debridement; and bone marrow stimulation was performed with Kwire. Twenty-sixof them formed the primary and 15 of them formed the revision group. Clinical assessment included the Ogilvie-Harris score and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. The defects were classified according to the system of Berndt and Harty. The lesion side, symptom time, trauma history, age-related complication, Ogilvie-Harris and AOFAS scores, follow-up period, and well-being condition of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 41 patients, 25 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 34.3 years (range 19-62), were included in the present study. Follow-up ranged from 23-73 month (mean 34,3). The individual analysis results showed that the pre-operative AOFAS scores were significantly different between the primary and the revision groups, while post-operative scores were not significantly different between the primary and therevision groups. For the whole group, the AOFAS skore was excellent in 9 patients, good in 25, fair in 6 and poor in one. In the primary group the AOFAS scores were good in 14 (54%), fair in four (15) and excellent in eight (31) patients, while in the revision group they were good in eleven (73%), fair in two (13%) and poor in one (7%) patient. The combined good and excellent scores were 85% for the primary group and 80% for the revision group. The mean AOFAS AHS score at the 12th month was 88.2 in the primary group and 82.8 in the revision group. Discussion: Arthroscopic curettage and bone marrow stimulating process is a viable method and recommended for both primary and revision treatment of an osteochonditis dissecans of the talus.","PeriodicalId":44485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5919 Received: 04.06.2018 Accepted: 08.10.2018 Published Online: 09.10.2018 Printed: 01.05.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(3): 359-64 Corresponding Author: Azad Yıldırım Diyarlife Dağ Kapı, Diyarbakır Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. E-Mail: yildirimazad@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7058-4476 Abstract Aim: Our aim is to share the mid-term results of debritment and marrow bone stimulation proccess in patients with talus OCD who did not respond to the conservative treatment. Material and Method: The patients with talus osteochondritis dissecans weretreated by arthroscopic debridement; and bone marrow stimulation was performed with Kwire. Twenty-sixof them formed the primary and 15 of them formed the revision group. Clinical assessment included the Ogilvie-Harris score and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. The defects were classified according to the system of Berndt and Harty. The lesion side, symptom time, trauma history, age-related complication, Ogilvie-Harris and AOFAS scores, follow-up period, and well-being condition of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 41 patients, 25 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 34.3 years (range 19-62), were included in the present study. Follow-up ranged from 23-73 month (mean 34,3). The individual analysis results showed that the pre-operative AOFAS scores were significantly different between the primary and the revision groups, while post-operative scores were not significantly different between the primary and therevision groups. For the whole group, the AOFAS skore was excellent in 9 patients, good in 25, fair in 6 and poor in one. In the primary group the AOFAS scores were good in 14 (54%), fair in four (15) and excellent in eight (31) patients, while in the revision group they were good in eleven (73%), fair in two (13%) and poor in one (7%) patient. The combined good and excellent scores were 85% for the primary group and 80% for the revision group. The mean AOFAS AHS score at the 12th month was 88.2 in the primary group and 82.8 in the revision group. Discussion: Arthroscopic curettage and bone marrow stimulating process is a viable method and recommended for both primary and revision treatment of an osteochonditis dissecans of the talus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
距骨软骨病变的关节镜治疗效果
DOI: 10.4328 / JCAM.5919收稿日期:04.06.2018收稿日期:08.10.2018出版日期:09.10.2018印刷日期:01.05.2019 J clinin Anal Med 2019;10(3): 359-64通讯作者:Azad Yıldırım Diyarlife daekapyi, Diyarbakır Hospital, Diyarbakır,土耳其。摘要目的:我们的目的是分享对保守治疗无反应的距骨强迫症患者的碎片化和骨髓刺激过程的中期结果。材料与方法:采用关节镜下清创术治疗离骨软骨炎;用Kwire进行骨髓刺激。其中26人组成初级小组,15人组成复习小组。临床评估包括Ogilvie-Harris评分和美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分。根据Berndt和Harty的系统对缺陷进行了分类。比较两组患者的病变部位、症状时间、创伤史、年龄相关并发症、Ogilvie-Harris评分、AOFAS评分、随访时间、健康状况。结果:共纳入41例患者,男25例,女16例,平均年龄34.3岁,年龄范围19 ~ 62岁。随访时间23-73个月(平均34,3)。个体分析结果显示,术前AOFAS评分在原发性组与翻修组之间差异有统计学意义,而术后评分在原发性组与翻修组之间差异无统计学意义。全组AOFAS评分优9例,良25例,一般6例,差1例。在初级组中,14例(54%)患者的AOFAS评分为良好,4例(15)患者的AOFAS评分为一般,8例(31)患者的AOFAS评分为优,而在改良组中,11例(73%)患者的AOFAS评分为良好,2例(13%)患者的AOFAS评分为一般,1例(7%)患者的AOFAS评分为差。初级组的综合良、优评分为85%,复习组的综合良、优评分为80%。初始组12个月的AOFAS AHS平均评分为88.2,修改组为82.8。讨论:关节镜下刮除和骨髓刺激治疗是一种可行的方法,推荐用于距骨夹层性骨软骨炎的原发性和复诊治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine is an international open-access journal containing peer-reviewed high-quality articles on clinical medicine in the areas of all research study types, reviews, and case reports. Our journal has become an important platform with the help of language support services, which make it easier for writers who have English as their second language to share their clinical experiences with the world.
期刊最新文献
Neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratios are associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis Antimicrobial activities of essential oils on microorganisms isolated from radiation dermatitis Effects of sociodemographic features and accompanying systemic diseases on urinary incontinence The importance of active surveillance in the detection of tuberculosis patients Assessment of patients undergoing therapeutic plasmapheresis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1