Open geospatial data: A comparison of data cultures in local government

IASSIST quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.29173/iq1013
Karen L Majewicz, Jaime Martindale, Melinda Kernik
{"title":"Open geospatial data: A comparison of data cultures in local government","authors":"Karen L Majewicz, Jaime Martindale, Melinda Kernik","doi":"10.29173/iq1013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public geospatial data (geodata) is created at all levels of government, including federal, state, and local (county and municipal). Local governments, in particular, are critical sources of geodata because they produce foundational datasets, such as parcels, road centerlines, address points, land use, and elevation. These datasets are sought after by other public agencies for aggregation into state and national frameworks, by researchers for analysis, and by cartographers to serve as base map layers. Despite the importance of this data, policies about whether it is free and open to the public vary from place to place. As a result, some regions offer hundreds of free and open datasets to the public, while their neighbors may have zero, preferring to restrict them due to privacy, economic, or legal concerns. \nMinnesota relies on an approach that allows counties to choose for themselves if their geodata is free and open. By contrast, its neighboring state of Wisconsin has passed legislation requiring that specific foundational geospatial datasets created by counties must be freely available to the public. This paper compares the implications and outcomes of these diverging data cultures.","PeriodicalId":84870,"journal":{"name":"IASSIST quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IASSIST quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public geospatial data (geodata) is created at all levels of government, including federal, state, and local (county and municipal). Local governments, in particular, are critical sources of geodata because they produce foundational datasets, such as parcels, road centerlines, address points, land use, and elevation. These datasets are sought after by other public agencies for aggregation into state and national frameworks, by researchers for analysis, and by cartographers to serve as base map layers. Despite the importance of this data, policies about whether it is free and open to the public vary from place to place. As a result, some regions offer hundreds of free and open datasets to the public, while their neighbors may have zero, preferring to restrict them due to privacy, economic, or legal concerns. Minnesota relies on an approach that allows counties to choose for themselves if their geodata is free and open. By contrast, its neighboring state of Wisconsin has passed legislation requiring that specific foundational geospatial datasets created by counties must be freely available to the public. This paper compares the implications and outcomes of these diverging data cultures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放地理空间数据:地方政府数据文化的比较
公共地理空间数据(geodata)由各级政府创建,包括联邦、州和地方(县和市)。地方政府尤其是地理数据的关键来源,因为它们产生了基础数据集,如地块、道路中心线、地址点、土地利用和高程。这些数据集受到其他公共机构的追捧,被整合到州和国家框架中,被研究人员用于分析,被制图师用作基础地图层。尽管这些数据很重要,但关于它是否免费和向公众开放的政策因地而异。因此,一些地区向公众提供数百个免费和开放的数据集,而他们的邻居可能没有,出于隐私、经济或法律考虑,他们更愿意限制这些数据集。明尼苏达州依靠一种方法,允许各县自行选择其地理数据是否免费和开放。相比之下,其邻国威斯康星州已通过立法,要求各县创建的特定基础地理空间数据集必须向公众免费提供。本文比较了这些不同数据文化的含义和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Security and preservation of election data in Nigeria in the fourth industrial revolution Knowledge and perception of librarians towards cloud-based technology in academic libraries in southwest Nigeria Much new research, and advances for the IQ Data protection and right to privacy legislation in Kenya Guest editors’ notes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1