Early Recognition of Pediatric Strokes in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Factors Impeding Stroke Diagnosis in Children

Q4 Medicine Annals of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.26815/acn.2022.00367
S. Tan, W. Cher, S. Chong, A. Ang, S. Ganapathy, D. Chan, R. M. K. Tan
{"title":"Early Recognition of Pediatric Strokes in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Factors Impeding Stroke Diagnosis in Children","authors":"S. Tan, W. Cher, S. Chong, A. Ang, S. Ganapathy, D. Chan, R. M. K. Tan","doi":"10.26815/acn.2022.00367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Strokes are challenging to diagnose in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) as level of suspicion is low and atypical presentations are common. We analyzed clinical features, epidemiology and factors of delayed identification in arterial ischemic strokes (AIS) and hemorrhagic strokes (HS). Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort study of children aged between 29 days and 18 years old diagnosed with stroke between July 2016 to June 2021. Results: Among 36 children, 11 (30.5%) had AIS, 25 (69.4%) had HS. Median age for AIS was 9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2 to 9) and HS 9 years (IQR, 1 to 11.5) ( P =0.715). Focal neurological deficit was seen in 72.7% of AIS and 20% of HS ( P =0.006). Only 18.2% of AIS and 52.0% of HS presented within 6 hours of symptoms. Median time from symptom onset to ED presentation was 24 hours (IQR, 12 to 28) for AIS and 7 hours (IQR, 1.8 to 48) for HS ( P =0.595). Most (85.6%) arrived by own transport. Median time from presentation to neuroimaging was 7 hours (IQR, 0.9 to 7) for AIS and 4.8 (IQR, 1.3 to 16.8) hours for HS ( P =0.376). Eleven patients, 9/25 (36.0%) HS and 2/11 (18.2%) AIS, did not have stroke as differential diagnosis at ED ( P =0.714). Common initial diagnoses were viral illness or headaches. On univariate analysis, age <1 (odds ratio [OR], 17.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 250.4; P =0.035) and absence of focal neurological deficit (OR, 13.091; 95% CI, 1.5 to 117.9; P =0.022) were significant factors for delayed identification. Conclusion: Index of suspicion for pediatric strokes among caregivers and clinicians should be increased. Public awareness campaigns are recommended","PeriodicalId":33305,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26815/acn.2022.00367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Strokes are challenging to diagnose in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) as level of suspicion is low and atypical presentations are common. We analyzed clinical features, epidemiology and factors of delayed identification in arterial ischemic strokes (AIS) and hemorrhagic strokes (HS). Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort study of children aged between 29 days and 18 years old diagnosed with stroke between July 2016 to June 2021. Results: Among 36 children, 11 (30.5%) had AIS, 25 (69.4%) had HS. Median age for AIS was 9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2 to 9) and HS 9 years (IQR, 1 to 11.5) ( P =0.715). Focal neurological deficit was seen in 72.7% of AIS and 20% of HS ( P =0.006). Only 18.2% of AIS and 52.0% of HS presented within 6 hours of symptoms. Median time from symptom onset to ED presentation was 24 hours (IQR, 12 to 28) for AIS and 7 hours (IQR, 1.8 to 48) for HS ( P =0.595). Most (85.6%) arrived by own transport. Median time from presentation to neuroimaging was 7 hours (IQR, 0.9 to 7) for AIS and 4.8 (IQR, 1.3 to 16.8) hours for HS ( P =0.376). Eleven patients, 9/25 (36.0%) HS and 2/11 (18.2%) AIS, did not have stroke as differential diagnosis at ED ( P =0.714). Common initial diagnoses were viral illness or headaches. On univariate analysis, age <1 (odds ratio [OR], 17.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 250.4; P =0.035) and absence of focal neurological deficit (OR, 13.091; 95% CI, 1.5 to 117.9; P =0.022) were significant factors for delayed identification. Conclusion: Index of suspicion for pediatric strokes among caregivers and clinicians should be increased. Public awareness campaigns are recommended
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科对儿童脑卒中的早期认识:流行病学、临床表现和影响儿童脑卒中诊断的因素
目的:中风在儿科急诊科的诊断很有挑战性,因为怀疑程度低,非典型表现很常见。我们分析了动脉缺血性中风(AIS)和出血性中风(HS)的临床特征、流行病学和延迟识别因素。方法:对2016年7月至2021年6月期间被诊断为中风的29天至18岁儿童进行单中心回顾性队列研究。结果:36例患儿中,AIS 11例(30.5%),HS 25例(69.4%)。AIS的中位年龄为9岁(四分位间距[IQR],2至9岁),HS为9年(IQR,1至11.5岁)(P=0.715)。72.7%的AIS和20%的HS出现局灶性神经功能缺损(P=0.006)。只有18.2%的AIS和52.0%的HS在症状出现后6小时内出现。AIS从症状出现到ED出现的中位时间为24小时(IQR,12-28),HS为7小时(IQR:1.8-48)(P=0.595)。大多数(85.6%)乘坐自己的交通工具抵达。AIS从出现到神经成像的中位时间为7小时(IQR,0.9-7),HS为4.8小时(IQR:1.3-16.8)(P=0.376)。11名患者,9/25(36.0%)HS和2/11(18.2%)AIS,在ED时没有中风作为鉴别诊断(P=0.714)。常见的初步诊断为病毒性疾病或头痛。在单因素分析中,年龄<1(比值比[OR],17.5;95%置信区间[CI],1.2至250.4;P=0.035)和无局灶性神经功能缺损(比值比13.091;95%可信区间1.5至117.9;P=0.022)是延迟识别的重要因素。结论:护理人员和临床医生对儿科卒中的怀疑指数应该增加。建议开展公众宣传活动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Child Neurology
Annals of Child Neurology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Headache: A Comprehensive Review A Novel Compound Heterozygous Mutation in the GALC gene in a Tunisian Family Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Behavioral and Emotional Factors in Pediatric Patients with Headache Clinical Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreaks in Korea on Seizures in Children Clinical Analysis and Red Flag Signs in Pediatric Headache According to Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1