A retrospective study on treatment for postburn contracture of axilla with propeller flap cover at a tertiary care center

K. Kalita, Swamy Gurindagunta, M. Nithin
{"title":"A retrospective study on treatment for postburn contracture of axilla with propeller flap cover at a tertiary care center","authors":"K. Kalita, Swamy Gurindagunta, M. Nithin","doi":"10.4103/ijb.ijb_6_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The gold standard for burn scar reconstruction is to utilize adjacent skin flaps for the ease of operation and to match the skin characteristics. The objective of this study is to share our experiences using propeller flap cover for “postburn contracture of axilla (PBCA)” release reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This 5-year retrospective observational study was undertaken in the Plastic Surgery Department of GMCH, Guwahati, from 2016 to 2020 with the data available after obtaining the Ethics Committee approval. The patient records and photographs were gathered from the Medical Records and the Plastic Surgery Department of GMCH, Guwahati, respectively. Patients treated with a propeller flap cover were scrutinized. Results: The patients operated for PBCA were 36. There were 12 males and 14 females with a mean age of 21 years. Twelve patients with spared axillary dome skin underwent a central axis subcutaneous pedicle propeller flap. The flaps had dimensions of 8–12 cm in length and 6–9 cm in width. The pedicle was approximately 2–2.5 cm in diameter. The few complications seen included wound dehiscence and delayed wound healing, edge hypertrophy, band contractures, marginal necrosis, and pin cushioning. During follow-up, no recontractures were seen. Conclusions: We conclude that central axis subcutaneous pedicle propeller flap is a simple and effective treatment for mild-to-moderate PBCA with spared axillary dome skin. These flaps provide durable soft tissue cover with enhanced flap survival, functional mobility, and esthetics.","PeriodicalId":13336,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of burns","volume":"30 1","pages":"51 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of burns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijb.ijb_6_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The gold standard for burn scar reconstruction is to utilize adjacent skin flaps for the ease of operation and to match the skin characteristics. The objective of this study is to share our experiences using propeller flap cover for “postburn contracture of axilla (PBCA)” release reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This 5-year retrospective observational study was undertaken in the Plastic Surgery Department of GMCH, Guwahati, from 2016 to 2020 with the data available after obtaining the Ethics Committee approval. The patient records and photographs were gathered from the Medical Records and the Plastic Surgery Department of GMCH, Guwahati, respectively. Patients treated with a propeller flap cover were scrutinized. Results: The patients operated for PBCA were 36. There were 12 males and 14 females with a mean age of 21 years. Twelve patients with spared axillary dome skin underwent a central axis subcutaneous pedicle propeller flap. The flaps had dimensions of 8–12 cm in length and 6–9 cm in width. The pedicle was approximately 2–2.5 cm in diameter. The few complications seen included wound dehiscence and delayed wound healing, edge hypertrophy, band contractures, marginal necrosis, and pin cushioning. During follow-up, no recontractures were seen. Conclusions: We conclude that central axis subcutaneous pedicle propeller flap is a simple and effective treatment for mild-to-moderate PBCA with spared axillary dome skin. These flaps provide durable soft tissue cover with enhanced flap survival, functional mobility, and esthetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾性研究在三级保健中心螺旋桨皮瓣盖治疗腋窝烧伤后挛缩
背景:烧伤瘢痕重建的金标准是使用邻近皮瓣,以方便操作,并符合皮肤特征。本研究的目的是分享我们使用螺旋桨皮瓣盖进行“烧伤后腋窝挛缩”释放重建的经验。材料与方法:本研究于2016年至2020年在古瓦哈提GMCH整形外科进行,为期5年的回顾性观察性研究,数据已获得伦理委员会批准。患者记录和照片分别从古瓦哈提GMCH的医疗记录和整形外科收集。采用螺旋桨皮瓣盖治疗的患者被仔细检查。结果:行PBCA手术36例。男性12例,女性14例,平均年龄21岁。12例保留腋窝穹窿皮肤的患者行中轴皮下蒂螺旋桨皮瓣。皮瓣长8 ~ 12 cm,宽6 ~ 9 cm。蒂直径约2-2.5 cm。少数并发症包括伤口裂开和伤口愈合延迟,边缘肥大,带挛缩,边缘坏死和针缓冲。随访期间未见挛缩。结论:中轴皮下带蒂螺旋桨皮瓣是一种简单有效的治疗轻、中度PBCA的方法。这些皮瓣提供持久的软组织覆盖,增强皮瓣存活,功能机动性和美观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Role of physiotherapy in acute burns Dorsal metacarpal artery perforator-based flaps for the reconstruction of postburn dorsal finger defects Burn reconstruction: Severe mentosternal adhesion Postoperative positioning following the release of neck contractures Seven-year microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of burn wound infections in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1