The Assessment of Legal Knowledge among Obstetricians and Gynecologists about Legal Consequences of Assisted Reproductive Techniques

Tara Mohseni, S. Chaichian, M. Mohseni, Bahram Moazzami
{"title":"The Assessment of Legal Knowledge among Obstetricians and Gynecologists about Legal Consequences of Assisted Reproductive Techniques","authors":"Tara Mohseni, S. Chaichian, M. Mohseni, Bahram Moazzami","doi":"10.22037/BHL.V1I3.18067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim : With the emergence and proliferation of assisted reproductive techniques, the needs of societies have altered. Therefore, measuring the level of legal awareness of gynecologists and obstetricians as the primary consultants of infertile couples can be significantly influential. In this study, we aimed to provide insight into the lack of legal knowledge of this group of specialists, which undermines the quality of healthcare services. Materials and Methods : This cross-sectional study was conducted among 80 gynecologists and obstetricians in Tehran, Iran, during 2016. We used a 26-item questionnaire on the common legal challenges of infertile couples. Ethical Considerations : Verbal informed consent of the participants was obtained after explaining the purpose of the study and the positive consequences of enhancing medical education and improving doctor-patient relationship. Findings : In general, 30% of the participants were male and 70% were female (age range: 35-75 years). Further, 24% of the participants did not respond to the questionnaire due to limited or lack of knowledge, and 28% knew the permitted types of artificial insemination by Iran’s laws. Concerning the basic rights of the child, 17% provided the correct response, and regarding the parental rights, 4% were aware of the existing legal condition. Finally, on the subject of surrogacy contracts, 22% were cognizant of the critical basics. Conclusion : Based on the mentioned results and due to the deep gap between the fields of law and medicine, improvement of the existing curriculum in Iran is highly recommended. Citation:  Mohseni T, Chaichian Sh, Mohseni M, Moazzami B. The Assessment of Legal Knowledge among Obstetricians and Gynaecologists about Legal Consequences of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. Bioeth Health Law J. 2017; 1(3):27-30.","PeriodicalId":79926,"journal":{"name":"Health law journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/BHL.V1I3.18067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim : With the emergence and proliferation of assisted reproductive techniques, the needs of societies have altered. Therefore, measuring the level of legal awareness of gynecologists and obstetricians as the primary consultants of infertile couples can be significantly influential. In this study, we aimed to provide insight into the lack of legal knowledge of this group of specialists, which undermines the quality of healthcare services. Materials and Methods : This cross-sectional study was conducted among 80 gynecologists and obstetricians in Tehran, Iran, during 2016. We used a 26-item questionnaire on the common legal challenges of infertile couples. Ethical Considerations : Verbal informed consent of the participants was obtained after explaining the purpose of the study and the positive consequences of enhancing medical education and improving doctor-patient relationship. Findings : In general, 30% of the participants were male and 70% were female (age range: 35-75 years). Further, 24% of the participants did not respond to the questionnaire due to limited or lack of knowledge, and 28% knew the permitted types of artificial insemination by Iran’s laws. Concerning the basic rights of the child, 17% provided the correct response, and regarding the parental rights, 4% were aware of the existing legal condition. Finally, on the subject of surrogacy contracts, 22% were cognizant of the critical basics. Conclusion : Based on the mentioned results and due to the deep gap between the fields of law and medicine, improvement of the existing curriculum in Iran is highly recommended. Citation:  Mohseni T, Chaichian Sh, Mohseni M, Moazzami B. The Assessment of Legal Knowledge among Obstetricians and Gynaecologists about Legal Consequences of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. Bioeth Health Law J. 2017; 1(3):27-30.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇产科医师对辅助生殖技术法律后果的法律知识评价
背景和目的:随着辅助生殖技术的出现和扩散,社会的需求发生了变化。因此,衡量作为不育夫妇主要咨询师的妇产科医生的法律意识水平具有显著的影响。在本研究中,我们旨在深入了解这组专家缺乏法律知识,这破坏了医疗保健服务的质量。材料和方法:本横断面研究于2016年在伊朗德黑兰的80名妇科和产科医生中进行。我们使用了一份关于不孕夫妇常见法律挑战的26项问卷。伦理考虑:在解释了研究的目的以及加强医学教育和改善医患关系的积极后果后,获得了参与者的口头知情同意。研究结果:总体而言,30%的参与者为男性,70%为女性(年龄范围:35-75岁)。此外,24%的参与者由于知识有限或缺乏知识而没有回答问卷,28%的人知道伊朗法律允许的人工授精类型。关于儿童的基本权利,17%的人给出了正确的回答,关于父母的权利,4%的人知道现有的法律条件。最后,在代孕合同的问题上,22%的人认识到关键的基础知识。结论:基于上述结果,并且由于法律和医学领域之间的巨大差距,强烈建议改进伊朗现有的课程。引用本文:Mohseni T, Chaichian Sh, Mohseni M, Moazzami B.妇产科医生关于辅助生殖技术法律后果的法律知识评估。生物健康法学[j];1(3):研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Factors affecting to Elective Cesarean In Iran Pretrial Detention of Ill Offenders Principle of Nonmaleficence in Islamic Jurisprudence and law and its usage in Biomedical Jurisprudence An Islamic Model for Taking Patients' Spiritual History The Assessment of Legal Knowledge among Obstetricians and Gynecologists about Legal Consequences of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1