The role of coworking spaces in the changing landscape of future workplace agility: linking boundary organization theory and organizational development models

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0046
Eunhwa Yang, B. Sanborn, Yaoyi Zhou
{"title":"The role of coworking spaces in the changing landscape of future workplace agility: linking boundary organization theory and organizational development models","authors":"Eunhwa Yang, B. Sanborn, Yaoyi Zhou","doi":"10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to illustrate the potential of coworking spaces as one way to achieve optimal workplace arrangements and corporate real estate (CRE) agility, especially for large organizations. The authors suggest understanding coworking spaces from the boundary organization theory and organizational growth model.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study takes a threefold theoretical approach: conducting a literature review and identifying the gaps in coworking studies for large organizations, applying the organizational boundary theory in tandem with organizational growth models in the context of coworking spaces as a part of the workplace ecology and identifying future research agendas for coworking studies.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study proposes a conceptual framework of how coworking spaces can be viewed and used as a boundary object throughout the organizational growth phases. Besides, four major future research areas are proposed: case studies and/or empirical evidence of coworking spaces as CRE buffer zones and boundary objects for organizations, coworking space design and different formats of boundary object-infused collaboration, coworking space design and management for its own agility and flexibility and how coworking affects employees’ performance, health and well-being and professional training/mentoring.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor large organizations, there is a clear pressure to rethink CRE to increase workplace agility, flexibility and resilience, much accelerated with the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the effective use of coworking spaces as a part of CRE portfolios will help enhance corporates’ state and ability to reassess, realign and replan their CRE portfolios.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nMany existing studies about coworking spaces are based on observations and self-reported justification at an individual level. Whether and how coworking can benefit companies at an organizational level is largely unstudied and worth more attention. This study illustrates a new theoretical understanding of how coworking spaces can be a part of CRE portfolios and bring potential benefits of inter and intraorganizational collaboration throughout the phases of organizational growth.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to illustrate the potential of coworking spaces as one way to achieve optimal workplace arrangements and corporate real estate (CRE) agility, especially for large organizations. The authors suggest understanding coworking spaces from the boundary organization theory and organizational growth model. Design/methodology/approach This study takes a threefold theoretical approach: conducting a literature review and identifying the gaps in coworking studies for large organizations, applying the organizational boundary theory in tandem with organizational growth models in the context of coworking spaces as a part of the workplace ecology and identifying future research agendas for coworking studies. Findings This study proposes a conceptual framework of how coworking spaces can be viewed and used as a boundary object throughout the organizational growth phases. Besides, four major future research areas are proposed: case studies and/or empirical evidence of coworking spaces as CRE buffer zones and boundary objects for organizations, coworking space design and different formats of boundary object-infused collaboration, coworking space design and management for its own agility and flexibility and how coworking affects employees’ performance, health and well-being and professional training/mentoring. Practical implications For large organizations, there is a clear pressure to rethink CRE to increase workplace agility, flexibility and resilience, much accelerated with the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the effective use of coworking spaces as a part of CRE portfolios will help enhance corporates’ state and ability to reassess, realign and replan their CRE portfolios. Originality/value Many existing studies about coworking spaces are based on observations and self-reported justification at an individual level. Whether and how coworking can benefit companies at an organizational level is largely unstudied and worth more attention. This study illustrates a new theoretical understanding of how coworking spaces can be a part of CRE portfolios and bring potential benefits of inter and intraorganizational collaboration throughout the phases of organizational growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享办公空间在未来工作场所敏捷性变化中的作用:连接边界组织理论和组织发展模型
目的本研究旨在说明共享办公空间作为实现最佳工作场所安排和企业房地产(CRE)灵活性的一种方式的潜力,尤其是对大型组织而言。作者建议从边界组织理论和组织成长模型来理解共同工作空间。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了三重理论方法:进行文献综述并确定大型组织共同工作研究中的差距,将组织边界理论与组织增长模型结合起来,将共同工作空间作为工作场所生态学的一部分,并确定共同工作研究的未来研究议程。发现这项研究提出了一个概念框架,说明如何在整个组织成长阶段将共同工作空间视为边界对象并将其用作边界对象。此外,还提出了四个主要的未来研究领域:共同工作空间作为组织CRE缓冲区和边界对象的案例研究和/或经验证据,共同工作空间设计和不同形式的边界对象融合协作,共同办公空间设计和管理自身的灵活性和灵活性,以及共同工作如何影响员工的绩效,健康和福祉以及专业培训/指导。实际意义对于大型组织来说,重新思考CRE以提高工作场所的灵活性、灵活性和韧性的压力显而易见,随着最近的新冠肺炎大流行,这一压力大大加快。了解共同工作空间作为CRE投资组合的一部分的有效使用将有助于提高企业的状态和重新评估、调整和重新规划其CRE投资的能力。独创性/价值许多现有的关于共享办公空间的研究都是基于个人层面的观察和自我报告的理由。在组织层面上,共同工作是否以及如何使公司受益,在很大程度上还没有得到研究,值得更多关注。这项研究阐明了一种新的理论理解,即共同工作空间如何成为CRE投资组合的一部分,并在整个组织发展阶段为组织间和组织内合作带来潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis COVID-19 outcomes: exploring the footprints of the pandemic on the office sector in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1