Key performance indicators (KPIs) in Ghanaian university libraries: developing outcome-based metrics for staff performance

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Performance Measurement and Metrics Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1108/pmm-05-2022-0018
G. B. Amoah, Mabel K. Minishi-Majanja
{"title":"Key performance indicators (KPIs) in Ghanaian university libraries: developing outcome-based metrics for staff performance","authors":"G. B. Amoah, Mabel K. Minishi-Majanja","doi":"10.1108/pmm-05-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to audit the key performance indicators (KPIs) in Ghanaian university libraries. It aimed at finding out the KPIs used by Ghanaian university libraries and how effective they have been in correcting lapses in staff performance.Design/methodology/approachEmploying a quantitative research approach, the views of 218 librarians were elicited from nine universities in Ghana. Due to the manageable size of staff population in the libraries, the census sampling technique was adopted.FindingsResults indicated even though staff members were unaware of KPIs in their libraries, most of the respondents understood the concept and perceived is to be measuring the success and tracking performance in libraries. It was also revealed that most of the libraries did not have clear and measurable KPIs. Close to 80% of the libraries under study did not have clearly stated KPIs of which members of staff were aware. The study revealed that KPIs may differ from one library to the other, depending on the mission and vision statement of the library. For increased staff performance in Ghanaian university libraries the study recommends management to develop clear and measurable outcome-based metrics that will lead to high performance. This will not only address the needs of clients but also improve the libraries' efficiency in terms of information provision. Management should also have clear and measurable KPIs and make them available to library staff.Practical implicationsFor increased staff performance in Ghanaian university libraries the study recommends management to develop clear and measurable outcome-based metrics that will lead to high performance. This will not only address the needs of clients but also improve the libraries' efficiency in terms of information provision. Management should also have clear and measurable KPIs and make them available to library staff.Originality/valueThe study provides information on KPIs in Ghanaian university libraries and how to effectively deal with the challenges associated with its usage.","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-05-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to audit the key performance indicators (KPIs) in Ghanaian university libraries. It aimed at finding out the KPIs used by Ghanaian university libraries and how effective they have been in correcting lapses in staff performance.Design/methodology/approachEmploying a quantitative research approach, the views of 218 librarians were elicited from nine universities in Ghana. Due to the manageable size of staff population in the libraries, the census sampling technique was adopted.FindingsResults indicated even though staff members were unaware of KPIs in their libraries, most of the respondents understood the concept and perceived is to be measuring the success and tracking performance in libraries. It was also revealed that most of the libraries did not have clear and measurable KPIs. Close to 80% of the libraries under study did not have clearly stated KPIs of which members of staff were aware. The study revealed that KPIs may differ from one library to the other, depending on the mission and vision statement of the library. For increased staff performance in Ghanaian university libraries the study recommends management to develop clear and measurable outcome-based metrics that will lead to high performance. This will not only address the needs of clients but also improve the libraries' efficiency in terms of information provision. Management should also have clear and measurable KPIs and make them available to library staff.Practical implicationsFor increased staff performance in Ghanaian university libraries the study recommends management to develop clear and measurable outcome-based metrics that will lead to high performance. This will not only address the needs of clients but also improve the libraries' efficiency in terms of information provision. Management should also have clear and measurable KPIs and make them available to library staff.Originality/valueThe study provides information on KPIs in Ghanaian university libraries and how to effectively deal with the challenges associated with its usage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳大学图书馆的关键绩效指标(kpi):开发基于结果的员工绩效指标
目的对加纳大学图书馆的关键绩效指标进行审计。它的目的是找出加纳大学图书馆使用的关键绩效指标,以及它们在纠正工作人员绩效失误方面的效果。设计/方法/方法采用定量研究方法,从加纳的九所大学中征求了218名图书馆员的意见。由于图书馆的职员人数是可管理的,所以采用普查抽样的方法。调查结果表明,即使工作人员不知道他们图书馆中的kpi,大多数受访者都理解这个概念,并认为它是衡量图书馆的成功和跟踪绩效。它还揭示了大多数库没有明确和可测量的kpi。在接受调查的图书馆中,有近80%的图书馆没有明确说明员工所知道的关键绩效指标。该研究表明,kpi可能因图书馆的使命和愿景陈述而有所不同。为了提高加纳大学图书馆工作人员的绩效,该研究建议管理层制定清晰和可衡量的基于结果的指标,从而实现高绩效。这不仅满足了用户的需求,也提高了图书馆在提供信息方面的效率。管理层也应该有清晰和可衡量的关键绩效指标,并将其提供给图书馆员工。实际意义:为了提高加纳大学图书馆的工作人员绩效,该研究建议管理层制定明确和可衡量的基于结果的指标,从而实现高绩效。这不仅满足了用户的需求,也提高了图书馆在提供信息方面的效率。管理层也应该有清晰和可衡量的关键绩效指标,并将其提供给图书馆员工。原创性/价值本研究提供了加纳大学图书馆kpi的信息,以及如何有效地应对与使用kpi相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
期刊最新文献
First-gen and the library: a survey of student perceptions of academic library services Predicting student success with and without library instruction using supervised machine learning methods What space are you looking for? An evaluation of organizational climate and its relationship with job burnout in hospital and college libraries Revise, redUX, re-cycle: iterative website usability studies in an assessment cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1