Research note: The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on scientific work in German sociology

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2021-11-26 DOI:10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0023
Tim Sawert, Martha Keil
{"title":"Research note: The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on scientific work in German sociology","authors":"Tim Sawert, Martha Keil","doi":"10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific work is highly affected by the governments’ measures taken to reduce the spread of the virus. With closing colleges, universities, and kindergartens, scientists had to adapt to new forms of working procedures. Immediately after the peak of the first COVID-19 wave in Germany, we surveyed in professors and postdoctoral researchers in the field of German sociology in May 2020 to investigate how their work is constrained by these measures. In this research note, we present the results of this survey. They show that the position in the sociological field as well as demographic factors affect the degree to which sociologists feel constrained in their work. Postdoctoral sociologists feel more restricted in their work than professors, and qualitatively working sociologists more restricted than quantitatively working sociologists. Moreover, being a woman and having children under the age of 14 years increases the probability that sociologists expect to research less. Our empirical results shed some light on the effect of COVID-19 measures on working routines and inequality in Higher Education during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47292,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","volume":"50 1","pages":"338 - 348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific work is highly affected by the governments’ measures taken to reduce the spread of the virus. With closing colleges, universities, and kindergartens, scientists had to adapt to new forms of working procedures. Immediately after the peak of the first COVID-19 wave in Germany, we surveyed in professors and postdoctoral researchers in the field of German sociology in May 2020 to investigate how their work is constrained by these measures. In this research note, we present the results of this survey. They show that the position in the sociological field as well as demographic factors affect the degree to which sociologists feel constrained in their work. Postdoctoral sociologists feel more restricted in their work than professors, and qualitatively working sociologists more restricted than quantitatively working sociologists. Moreover, being a woman and having children under the age of 14 years increases the probability that sociologists expect to research less. Our empirical results shed some light on the effect of COVID-19 measures on working routines and inequality in Higher Education during the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究说明:新冠肺炎大流行及其对德国社会学科学工作的影响
摘要自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,科学工作受到政府为减少病毒传播而采取的措施的高度影响。随着学院、大学和幼儿园的关闭,科学家们不得不适应新形式的工作程序。在德国第一波新冠肺炎疫情达到高峰后,我们于2020年5月对德国社会学领域的教授和博士后研究人员进行了调查,以调查他们的工作如何受到这些措施的限制。在本研究报告中,我们介绍了这项调查的结果。他们表明,社会学领域的地位以及人口统计因素会影响社会学家在工作中受到约束的程度。博士后社会学家在工作中比教授更受限制,而从事质量工作的社会学家比从事数量工作的社会学家更受限制。此外,身为女性并有14岁以下的孩子会增加社会学家期望减少研究的可能性。我们的实证结果揭示了新冠肺炎措施对疫情期间高等教育日常工作和不平等的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Soziologie veröffentlicht Beiträge aus allen Bereichen der Soziologie. Sie erscheint sechs Mal im Jahr und veröffentlicht pro Heft in der Regel vier Forschungsartikel, bisweilen aber auch kürzere Forschungsnotizen und soziologische Essays. In unserem Online-Heftarchiv, das sich zur Zeit im Aufbau befindet, erhalten unsere Online-Abonnenten Zugriff auf alle Inhalte der Zeitschrift für Soziologie. Der Zugriff auf Artikel, deren Veröffentlichungsdatum mindestens zwei Jahre zurückliegt, ist allen Nutzern gestattet. Von unseren aktuellen Heften ist jeweils ein Artikel pro Heft vom Tage des Erscheinens an frei zugänglich.
期刊最新文献
Effizienz und soziale Ungleichheit in strikt leistungsdifferenzierenden Bildungssystemen. Eine kritische Betrachtung des Model of Ability Tracking (MoAbiT) Die Zukunft sozialer Rechte Multiple Differenzierung und Wandel. Der Beitrag der evolutionär-institutionalistischen Perspektive Distinct Boundaries? Preferences of Immigrants’ Descendants Regarding Partnerships with Recent Refugees from Syria and Afghanistan in Germany Assessing the Importance of Sample Choice and Selectivity for Sex Segregation in College Majors: A Replication of Ochsenfeld (2016)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1