Policies and Practices Governing Disability in Malaysia’s Higher Education: A Comparison with England and Australia

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International and Comparative Education Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.14425/jice.2019.8.2.85
Clarene Tan, Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah, Munir Shuib
{"title":"Policies and Practices Governing Disability in Malaysia’s Higher Education: A Comparison with England and Australia","authors":"Clarene Tan, Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah, Munir Shuib","doi":"10.14425/jice.2019.8.2.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the last decade in Malaysia, participation of students with disabilities in higher education has seen minimal growth. This paper investigates the policies and practices regulating disability in Malaysia’s higher education. Three aspects — legislation, funding, and governance — are analysed. To reveal the gaps in policy and practice, comparison is carried out with the cases of England and Australia. The research involved examining government documents such as disability acts, action plans, and research and statistics reports, combined with interviewing university administrators. It was found that Malaysian legislation requires more supporting details and that disability funding for universities should be considered. For governance, systematic legislation review and specific university monitoring are recommended. Establishing an independent national entity to conciliate grievances is proposed to address the inadequate redress mechanism available for students with disabilities. Overall, the government and universities could ensure that disability information is available in the public domain, especially online. Such practice would enhance disability awareness and knowledge for all. Although this paper mainly takes on the perspective of a developing nation, it attains an international orientation as it also depicts the workings of the developed world in governing disability in higher education.","PeriodicalId":42500,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International and Comparative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International and Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2019.8.2.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Throughout the last decade in Malaysia, participation of students with disabilities in higher education has seen minimal growth. This paper investigates the policies and practices regulating disability in Malaysia’s higher education. Three aspects — legislation, funding, and governance — are analysed. To reveal the gaps in policy and practice, comparison is carried out with the cases of England and Australia. The research involved examining government documents such as disability acts, action plans, and research and statistics reports, combined with interviewing university administrators. It was found that Malaysian legislation requires more supporting details and that disability funding for universities should be considered. For governance, systematic legislation review and specific university monitoring are recommended. Establishing an independent national entity to conciliate grievances is proposed to address the inadequate redress mechanism available for students with disabilities. Overall, the government and universities could ensure that disability information is available in the public domain, especially online. Such practice would enhance disability awareness and knowledge for all. Although this paper mainly takes on the perspective of a developing nation, it attains an international orientation as it also depicts the workings of the developed world in governing disability in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚高等教育中管理残疾的政策和实践:与英国和澳大利亚的比较
在马来西亚过去的十年中,残疾学生接受高等教育的人数几乎没有增长。本文调查了马来西亚高等教育中对残疾人的政策和做法。分析了三个方面——立法、资金和治理。为了揭示政策和实践上的差距,与英国和澳大利亚的案例进行了比较。这项研究包括查阅政府文件,如残疾人法案、行动计划、研究和统计报告,以及采访大学管理人员。研究发现,马来西亚的立法需要更多的支持性细节,应该考虑为大学提供残疾人资助。在治理方面,建议进行系统的立法审查和具体的大学监督。建议建立一个独立的国家实体来调解不满,以解决残疾学生可用的补救机制不足的问题。总的来说,政府和大学可以确保残疾人信息在公共领域,特别是在网上是可获得的。这种做法将提高所有人对残疾的认识和知识。虽然本文主要从发展中国家的角度出发,但由于它也描述了发达国家在管理高等教育中的残疾方面的工作,因此它具有国际导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International and Comparative Education
Journal of International and Comparative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Designing World Language Curriculum for Intercultural Communicative Competence Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications Private Tuition in Cambodia: Evidence from Urban and Rural Upper Secondary Schools Test Anxiety: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Test Anxiety Among form Four School Students in Malaysia Key Issues and “Push/Pull” Messaging on South East Asian Education Agency Websites Book Review: Shadow Education in the Middle East: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1