{"title":"Language, sexuality and corpus linguistics","authors":"Jack Baker","doi":"10.1075/JLS.17018.BAK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper I discuss the potential that corpus linguistics approaches have to make in terms of enabling research on language and\n sexuality. After giving some background relating to my involvement in the development of this approach and discussion of some of\n the benefits of using corpus linguistics, I then outline some potential areas for concern, including: misconceptions of the field\n as only quantitative, the danger of reading only concordance lines, over-reliance on the idea of removing bias, the tendency of\n corpus approaches to focus on difference or easily searchable features and issues with copyright and ethics. I then discuss\n potential future directions that the approach could take, focussing on work in non-western and non-English contexts, the\n development of new tools such as Lancsbox, and the integration of multimodal analyses, using examples from my own work and\n others.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLS.17018.BAK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
In this paper I discuss the potential that corpus linguistics approaches have to make in terms of enabling research on language and
sexuality. After giving some background relating to my involvement in the development of this approach and discussion of some of
the benefits of using corpus linguistics, I then outline some potential areas for concern, including: misconceptions of the field
as only quantitative, the danger of reading only concordance lines, over-reliance on the idea of removing bias, the tendency of
corpus approaches to focus on difference or easily searchable features and issues with copyright and ethics. I then discuss
potential future directions that the approach could take, focussing on work in non-western and non-English contexts, the
development of new tools such as Lancsbox, and the integration of multimodal analyses, using examples from my own work and
others.