Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of four iron fertilizer sources

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural & Environmental Letters Pub Date : 2021-10-05 DOI:10.1002/ael2.20052
R. Jay Goos
{"title":"Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of four iron fertilizer sources","authors":"R. Jay Goos","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A relatively new iron fertilizer in the United States is FeHBED [Fe-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetate], a chelate with a stability constant for ferric iron greater than FeEDDHA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(o-hydroxyphenylacetate]. This study compared response of soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] over two greenhouse cropping periods to FeHBED, FeEDDHA-1 (∼80% ortho-ortho isomer), FeEDDHA-2 (∼50% ortho-ortho isomer), and FeEDDHSA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N-di([2-hydroxy 5-sulfophenyl])acetate]. FeHBED and FeEDDHA-1 gave positive responses to all measured parameters (chlorophyll level, dry matter production, Fe uptake) that were not significantly different (.05 level) from each other for the two cropping periods. The two products were similar in performance. FeEDDHA-2 and FeEDDHSA generally gave lesser responses than FeHBED or FeEDDHA-1. The relative effectiveness of the four materials to increase dry matter or Fe uptake was predicted by a simple laboratory test, which measures the proportion of applied Fe remaining soluble after a 1-wk incubation with soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A relatively new iron fertilizer in the United States is FeHBED [Fe-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetate], a chelate with a stability constant for ferric iron greater than FeEDDHA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(o-hydroxyphenylacetate]. This study compared response of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] over two greenhouse cropping periods to FeHBED, FeEDDHA-1 (∼80% ortho-ortho isomer), FeEDDHA-2 (∼50% ortho-ortho isomer), and FeEDDHSA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N-di([2-hydroxy 5-sulfophenyl])acetate]. FeHBED and FeEDDHA-1 gave positive responses to all measured parameters (chlorophyll level, dry matter production, Fe uptake) that were not significantly different (.05 level) from each other for the two cropping periods. The two products were similar in performance. FeEDDHA-2 and FeEDDHSA generally gave lesser responses than FeHBED or FeEDDHA-1. The relative effectiveness of the four materials to increase dry matter or Fe uptake was predicted by a simple laboratory test, which measures the proportion of applied Fe remaining soluble after a 1-wk incubation with soil.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种铁肥源的实验室和温室评价
在美国,一种相对较新的铁肥是FeHBED [Fe-N,N ' -双(2-羟基苯基)乙二胺-N,N ' -双乙酸酯],它是一种螯合物,对铁的稳定常数大于FeEDDHA [fe -乙二胺-N,N ' -双(o-羟基苯基乙酸酯)]。本研究比较了大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。]在两个温室种植期间,对FeHBED、FeEDDHA-1(~ 80%的邻位异构体)、FeEDDHA-2(~ 50%的邻位异构体)和FeEDDHSA [fe -乙二胺- n, n -二([2-羟基5-巯基])乙酸]进行了研究。FeHBED和FeEDDHA-1对所有测量参数(叶绿素水平、干物质产量、铁吸收)均有正响应,差异不显著(p < 0.05)。0.05水平)。这两种产品的性能相似。FeEDDHA-2和FeEDDHSA的反应一般小于FeHBED或FeEDDHA-1。通过一项简单的实验室试验预测了四种材料增加干物质或铁吸收的相对有效性,该试验测量了施用铁与土壤孵育1周后仍可溶解的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The influence of climate on varietal similarities across countries Our connections to soil health through simile When are you measuring soil β-glucosidase activities in cropping systems? Soil organic matter characteristics of four soil types under different conservation strategies across Hubei Province A tool for integrating agrometeorological observation data for digital agriculture: A Minnesota case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1