Comparing therapeutic maneuvers in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_180_22
R. Komathi, Karthik Ravi, M. Sivaranjani, M. Sharanya
{"title":"Comparing therapeutic maneuvers in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo","authors":"R. Komathi, Karthik Ravi, M. Sivaranjani, M. Sharanya","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_180_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo accounting for around 24% of all peripheral vestibular abnormalities and the posterior semicircular canal being the most affected. The most common cause of BPPV is idiopathic, others being inner ear disorders, trauma, infection, and increasing age. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of Epley's maneuver alone and Epley's maneuver with Brandt–Daroff exercises in the management of posterior semicircular canal BPPV, thereby comparing the recurrence rate after treatment in both groups. Materials and Methods: The study was a randomized prospective clinical trial with parallel and superiority trial design where 94 consecutive patients with posterior semicircular canal BPPV and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled into two Groups A = 47 and B = 47. All subjects underwent detailed history, examination, and assessment with UCLA dizziness questionnaire and videonystagmography. Group A patients received Epley's maneuver while group B received Epley's maneuver with Brandt–Daroff exercises as the treatment, with follow-up done on the 1st and 2nd weeks and after 1 month. Results: The age group of the majority of the patients in the study ranged between 51 and 60 years. The percentage of females in the study was 54.3% and males 45.7%. Results showed significant improvement in vertigo and nystagmus in both groups, with Group B having lesser recurrence during the follow-up visits. Conclusion: Both Epley's maneuver and Brandt–Daroff exercises are ideal means of treatment, but a combined approach of the two maneuvers yields better outcome in terms of symptomatic resolution and less recurrence.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"29 1","pages":"61 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_180_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo accounting for around 24% of all peripheral vestibular abnormalities and the posterior semicircular canal being the most affected. The most common cause of BPPV is idiopathic, others being inner ear disorders, trauma, infection, and increasing age. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of Epley's maneuver alone and Epley's maneuver with Brandt–Daroff exercises in the management of posterior semicircular canal BPPV, thereby comparing the recurrence rate after treatment in both groups. Materials and Methods: The study was a randomized prospective clinical trial with parallel and superiority trial design where 94 consecutive patients with posterior semicircular canal BPPV and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled into two Groups A = 47 and B = 47. All subjects underwent detailed history, examination, and assessment with UCLA dizziness questionnaire and videonystagmography. Group A patients received Epley's maneuver while group B received Epley's maneuver with Brandt–Daroff exercises as the treatment, with follow-up done on the 1st and 2nd weeks and after 1 month. Results: The age group of the majority of the patients in the study ranged between 51 and 60 years. The percentage of females in the study was 54.3% and males 45.7%. Results showed significant improvement in vertigo and nystagmus in both groups, with Group B having lesser recurrence during the follow-up visits. Conclusion: Both Epley's maneuver and Brandt–Daroff exercises are ideal means of treatment, but a combined approach of the two maneuvers yields better outcome in terms of symptomatic resolution and less recurrence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的治疗手法比较
背景:良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是眩晕最常见的原因,约占所有外周前庭异常的24%,后半规管受到的影响最大。BPPV最常见的原因是特发性的,其他原因是内耳疾病、创伤、感染和年龄增长。目的:本研究评估了单独使用Epley手法和Epley手法结合Brandt–Daroff练习治疗后半规管BPPV的疗效,从而比较了两组治疗后的复发率。材料和方法:该研究是一项随机前瞻性临床试验,采用平行和优越性试验设计,将94名符合纳入标准的连续后半规管BPPV患者分为a组=47和B组=47。所有受试者都接受了详细的病史、检查和评估,包括加州大学洛杉矶分校的头晕问卷和视频眼球震颤描记术。A组患者接受Epley手法治疗,B组患者接受以Brandt-Daroff运动为治疗的Epley手法,在第1周、第2周和1个月后进行随访。结果:研究中大多数患者的年龄组在51至60岁之间。研究中女性的比例为54.3%,男性为45.7%。结果显示,两组的眩晕和眼球震颤均有显著改善,B组在随访中复发率较低。结论:Epley手法和Brandt-Daroff手法都是理想的治疗方法,但两种手法的联合治疗在症状缓解和复发率方面效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1