Forensic epistemology: testing the reasoning skills of crime scene experts

M. Illes, P. Wilson, Catherine D. Bruce
{"title":"Forensic epistemology: testing the reasoning skills of crime scene experts","authors":"M. Illes, P. Wilson, Catherine D. Bruce","doi":"10.1080/00085030.2019.1664260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, crime scene analysis has been transitioning from being a technical discipline to being a scientific process. This progression is shifting the forensic practitioner examining crime scenes into a deeper level of scientific reasoning. This study evaluates the use of reasoning by practitioners in the disciplines of crime scene investigations and bloodstain pattern analysis. A well-established classroom test of scientific reasoning (CTSR) was distributed online to active crime scene investigators (CSI) and bloodstain pattern analysts (BPA) (n = 213) using Qualtrics software. The survey provides quantitative data on the reasoning ability of the participating practitioners along with demographic information on education, employment status (specifically, police or civilian), and work experience. Linear regression analyses indicate that there is a significant difference between the CTSR scores and education level. The higher educated practitioner (graduate level) performed better on the reasoning test. No significant differences were found between the test scores and the years of experience, even when sectioned into 5-year increments of 5 to 25+ years of experience. Similarly, there was no difference between the test scores and employment status for the CSI group and within the BPA group. This information suggests that the level of education plays the most important role in the development and use of reasoning skills, whereas experience and employment status are not as influential. The test scores were also mapped to Piaget’s categories – concrete operational, transitional and formal operational reasoners – with 69.5% of CSI and 77% of BPA scoring as formal operational reasoners. The authors recommend that a CTSR be used for testing current and future (tertiary forensic students) practitioners for evaluating reasoning skills and identifying scientific learning gaps. This study also supports further research into forensic epistemology and pedagogy, to deepen our knowledge of science in forensic science.","PeriodicalId":44383,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"151 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00085030.2019.1664260","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2019.1664260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, crime scene analysis has been transitioning from being a technical discipline to being a scientific process. This progression is shifting the forensic practitioner examining crime scenes into a deeper level of scientific reasoning. This study evaluates the use of reasoning by practitioners in the disciplines of crime scene investigations and bloodstain pattern analysis. A well-established classroom test of scientific reasoning (CTSR) was distributed online to active crime scene investigators (CSI) and bloodstain pattern analysts (BPA) (n = 213) using Qualtrics software. The survey provides quantitative data on the reasoning ability of the participating practitioners along with demographic information on education, employment status (specifically, police or civilian), and work experience. Linear regression analyses indicate that there is a significant difference between the CTSR scores and education level. The higher educated practitioner (graduate level) performed better on the reasoning test. No significant differences were found between the test scores and the years of experience, even when sectioned into 5-year increments of 5 to 25+ years of experience. Similarly, there was no difference between the test scores and employment status for the CSI group and within the BPA group. This information suggests that the level of education plays the most important role in the development and use of reasoning skills, whereas experience and employment status are not as influential. The test scores were also mapped to Piaget’s categories – concrete operational, transitional and formal operational reasoners – with 69.5% of CSI and 77% of BPA scoring as formal operational reasoners. The authors recommend that a CTSR be used for testing current and future (tertiary forensic students) practitioners for evaluating reasoning skills and identifying scientific learning gaps. This study also supports further research into forensic epistemology and pedagogy, to deepen our knowledge of science in forensic science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医认识论:检验犯罪现场专家的推理能力
近年来,犯罪现场分析已经从一门技术学科向一门科学过程过渡。这一进展正在将检查犯罪现场的法医从业者转变为更深层次的科学推理。本研究评估了在犯罪现场调查和血迹模式分析学科的从业人员使用推理。利用Qualtrics软件,将一套完善的课堂科学推理测试(CTSR)在线分发给犯罪现场调查人员(CSI)和血迹模式分析人员(BPA) (n = 213)。该调查提供了参与从业者推理能力的定量数据,以及教育、就业状况(特别是警察或平民)和工作经验等人口统计信息。线性回归分析表明,CTSR得分与教育水平之间存在显著差异。受过高等教育的从业者(研究生水平)在推理测试中表现更好。测试成绩和工作经验之间没有明显的差异,即使被划分为5到25年以上的5年工作经验。同样,CSI组和BPA组的测试成绩和就业状况之间也没有差异。这一信息表明,教育水平在发展和使用推理技能方面起着最重要的作用,而经验和就业状况则没有那么大的影响。测试分数也被映射到皮亚杰的分类中——具体操作推理者、过渡推理者和正式操作推理者——69.5%的CSI和77%的BPA得分为正式操作推理者。作者建议使用CTSR来测试当前和未来的(高等法医学生)从业人员,以评估推理技能和识别科学学习差距。本研究也有助于进一步研究法医认识论和教育学,以加深我们对法医科学的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Possible dependence of sternum non-metric features on sex, age, and stature from a forensic viewpoint: a study in an Iranian population Background and persistence of fibers on vehicle seat belts A fatal motor vehicle collision involving multiple novel psychoactive substances Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a manual codification system for footwear impressions: first lessons learned from the development of a footwear database for forensic intelligence purposes Individual age estimation using pulp-to-tooth area ratio in single-rooted teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1