Facsimiles of yore: printing technology and the page image in the Japanese Government General of Korea’s reproduction of historical sources

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Modern Asian Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1017/s0026749x22000464
G. R. Reynolds
{"title":"Facsimiles of yore: printing technology and the page image in the Japanese Government General of Korea’s reproduction of historical sources","authors":"G. R. Reynolds","doi":"10.1017/s0026749x22000464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the 1930s the Japanese Government General of Korea’s Society for the Compilation of Korean History commissioned facsimiles of some 21 rare historical sources to accompany the publication of the colossal History of Korea (Chōsenshi 朝鮮史), funnelling select xylographic, typographic, and chirographic products of the defunct Chosŏn dynasty’s book ecology through offset lithography and collotype, and on occasion movable type. This article investigates the Society for the Compilation of Korean History’s collection and classification of historical materials against the larger backdrop of colonial knowledge production, illuminates the different economic and editorial logics of the new printing technologies used to produce the facsimiles, and examines the products as one example of the significance of facsimiles in the field of history. It suggests that the interplay of traditional print media, dominated by woodblock prints, and the new photomechanical means of reproduction, allowed for the swift reproduction of the unfolded page image and the easy utilization of traditional-style binding, permitting the Society to create purposefully antiquated reproductions with a high degree of fidelity to the original. At the same time, the use of modern materials (paper, string, and covers) and certain features common to traditional Japanese book binding meant that the facsimiles were irrevocably hybrid. These facsimiles ended up in a wide range of research libraries, representing the Korean past to the scholarly community in the Japanese empire.","PeriodicalId":51574,"journal":{"name":"Modern Asian Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x22000464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 1930s the Japanese Government General of Korea’s Society for the Compilation of Korean History commissioned facsimiles of some 21 rare historical sources to accompany the publication of the colossal History of Korea (Chōsenshi 朝鮮史), funnelling select xylographic, typographic, and chirographic products of the defunct Chosŏn dynasty’s book ecology through offset lithography and collotype, and on occasion movable type. This article investigates the Society for the Compilation of Korean History’s collection and classification of historical materials against the larger backdrop of colonial knowledge production, illuminates the different economic and editorial logics of the new printing technologies used to produce the facsimiles, and examines the products as one example of the significance of facsimiles in the field of history. It suggests that the interplay of traditional print media, dominated by woodblock prints, and the new photomechanical means of reproduction, allowed for the swift reproduction of the unfolded page image and the easy utilization of traditional-style binding, permitting the Society to create purposefully antiquated reproductions with a high degree of fidelity to the original. At the same time, the use of modern materials (paper, string, and covers) and certain features common to traditional Japanese book binding meant that the facsimiles were irrevocably hybrid. These facsimiles ended up in a wide range of research libraries, representing the Korean past to the scholarly community in the Japanese empire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昔日的传真:印刷技术与朝鲜日本政府将军史料复制中的页面图像
在20世纪30年代,日本韩国政府总督会的朝鲜历史编纂协会委托制作了大约21份罕见的历史资料的复制品,以配合庞大的《朝鲜历史》(Chōsenshi)的出版,通过胶版印刷和胶印,以及偶尔的活字印刷,精选了已经灭亡的Chosŏn王朝的书籍生态的木版、排版和书体产品。本文考察了韩国历史编纂学会在殖民知识生产的大背景下对历史资料的收集和分类,阐明了用于生产传真的新印刷技术的不同经济和编辑逻辑,并将这些产品作为传真在历史领域意义的一个例子进行了考察。这表明,以木刻版画为主导的传统印刷媒体与新的照相复制手段的相互作用,使得展开的页面图像的快速复制和传统风格装订的轻松利用成为可能,从而使协会能够有目的地制作出对原作高度逼真的古老复制品。与此同时,现代材料(纸张、线绳和封面)的使用以及日本传统书籍装帧的某些特征意味着这些复制品是不可逆转的混合。这些摹本最终在许多研究图书馆中保存下来,对日本帝国的学术界来说,它们代表着朝鲜的过去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Asian Studies
Modern Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Modern Asian Studies promotes original, innovative and rigorous research on the history, sociology, economics and culture of modern Asia. Covering South Asia, South-East Asia, China, Japan and Korea, the journal is published in six parts each year. It welcomes articles which deploy inter-disciplinary and comparative research methods. Modern Asian Studies specialises in the publication of longer monographic essays based on path-breaking new research; it also carries substantial synoptic essays which illuminate the state of the broad field in fresh ways. It contains a book review section which offers detailed analysis of important new publications in the field.
期刊最新文献
A Song of Fallen Flowers: Miyazaki Tōten and the making of naniwabushi as a mode of popular dissent in transwar Japan, 1902–1909 Effect of Rhinoplasty on Various Angles of Nose on Ideal Position and Alignment in Indian Population. Justifying the use of excessive force: A critical discourse analysis of Chinese police individual WeChat Subscription Accounts ASS volume 57 issue 6 Cover and Back matter ASS volume 57 issue 6 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1