A note on the Greek and Ethiopic text of 1 Enoch 5:8

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0951820719875726

Fiodar Litvinau

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Greek and Ethiopic versions of 1 Enoch 5:8 preserve a different text at the end of the passage. This note aims to demonstrate the superiority of the Ethiopic text of 1 En. 5:8 over the version preserved in Codex Panapolitanus by arguing that the Greek reading must be treated as a scribal addition influenced by Gnostic terminology.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

以诺一书5:8的希腊文和埃塞俄比亚文注释

以诺一书5:8的希腊文和埃塞俄比亚文版本在这段经文的末尾保留了不同的文本。本笔记的目的是通过论证希腊文本必须被视为受诺斯替主义术语影响的抄写补充，来证明埃塞俄比亚文本的En 1 5:8比保存在帕纳波利塔努斯抄本中的版本优越。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The last twenty years have witnessed some remarkable achievements in the study of early Jewish literature. Given the ever-increasing number and availability of primary sources for these writings, specialists have been producing text-critical, historical, social scientific, and theological studies which, in turn, have fuelled a growing interest among scholars, students, religious leaders, and the wider public. The only English journal of its kind, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha was founded in 1987 to provide a much-needed forum for scholars to discuss and review most recent developments in this burgeoning field in the academy.