Application of a Head-Up Tilt Table Test in Differentiation Between Epilepsy and Syncope in Children

Meisam Babaei, M. Nasehi, M. Khalilian, Maryam Rasoulinezhad, Hossein Tavallai, Fargol Farahmandi
{"title":"Application of a Head-Up Tilt Table Test in Differentiation Between Epilepsy and Syncope in Children","authors":"Meisam Babaei, M. Nasehi, M. Khalilian, Maryam Rasoulinezhad, Hossein Tavallai, Fargol Farahmandi","doi":"10.5812/compreped-128132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Distinguishing between seizure and neurally mediated syncope is challenging because of similar consequences and medical history. A head-up tilt test (HUTT) is a non-invasive, simple, and easy test to distinguish between epilepsy and syncope besides detailed history taking. Objectives: This study aimed to differentiate between epileptic events and reflex syncope (any different type of syncope) using the head-upright tilt test. Methods: We studied 59 patients (37 boys and 22 girls) between 4 to 18 years old (mean age, 10.5 ± 3.7 years) with a previous diagnosis of seizure who did not respond well to treatment. All patients underwent HUTT, and the test was positive in 26 patients. There were no significant differences in sex, age, provocative factors, associated syndrome, and family history between negative and positive groups. Results: There was a history of actual syncope in 26.9% of the positive tilt test group compared to 15.15% of the negative test group. Also, there was a positive family history of syncope in the positive tilt test group. Among 26 patients with a positive tilt test, 17 were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope (VVS) vasodepressor type and 9 with mixed type. Antiepileptic drugs were tapered for patients diagnosed with VVS, and they did not show any seizures after 18 ± 6 months of follow-up. Overemphasizing positive family history and inattention to history taking are 2 crucial factors leading to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Conclusions: Our study showed that HUTT is a non-invasive test that can be useful, especially for early and proper diagnosis in children with refractory epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":37929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/compreped-128132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing between seizure and neurally mediated syncope is challenging because of similar consequences and medical history. A head-up tilt test (HUTT) is a non-invasive, simple, and easy test to distinguish between epilepsy and syncope besides detailed history taking. Objectives: This study aimed to differentiate between epileptic events and reflex syncope (any different type of syncope) using the head-upright tilt test. Methods: We studied 59 patients (37 boys and 22 girls) between 4 to 18 years old (mean age, 10.5 ± 3.7 years) with a previous diagnosis of seizure who did not respond well to treatment. All patients underwent HUTT, and the test was positive in 26 patients. There were no significant differences in sex, age, provocative factors, associated syndrome, and family history between negative and positive groups. Results: There was a history of actual syncope in 26.9% of the positive tilt test group compared to 15.15% of the negative test group. Also, there was a positive family history of syncope in the positive tilt test group. Among 26 patients with a positive tilt test, 17 were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope (VVS) vasodepressor type and 9 with mixed type. Antiepileptic drugs were tapered for patients diagnosed with VVS, and they did not show any seizures after 18 ± 6 months of follow-up. Overemphasizing positive family history and inattention to history taking are 2 crucial factors leading to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Conclusions: Our study showed that HUTT is a non-invasive test that can be useful, especially for early and proper diagnosis in children with refractory epilepsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平视倾斜试验在儿童癫痫与晕厥鉴别中的应用
背景:由于相似的后果和病史,区分癫痫发作和神经介导的晕厥具有挑战性。抬头倾斜试验(HUTT)是一种非侵入性、简单易行的试验,除了详细的病史记录外,还可以区分癫痫和晕厥。目的:本研究旨在通过直立倾斜试验来区分癫痫事件和反射性晕厥(任何不同类型的晕厥)。方法:我们研究了59名4至18岁(平均年龄10.5±3.7岁)的既往诊断为癫痫发作的患者(37名男孩和22名女孩),这些患者对治疗反应不佳。所有患者都接受了HUTT,26名患者的检测结果呈阳性。阴性组和阳性组在性别、年龄、刺激因素、相关综合征和家族史方面没有显著差异。结果:倾斜试验阳性组有26.9%的患者有实际晕厥史,而倾斜试验阴性组有15.15%的患者有晕厥史。此外,倾斜试验阳性组有晕厥阳性家族史。在26例倾斜试验呈阳性的患者中,17例诊断为血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)降压药型,9例诊断为混合型。对于诊断为VVS的患者,抗癫痫药物逐渐减少,随访18±6个月后没有出现任何癫痫发作。过分强调阳性家族史和忽视病史记录是导致癫痫误诊的两个关键因素。结论:我们的研究表明,HUTT是一种有用的非侵入性测试,特别是对难治性癫痫儿童的早期正确诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics is the official publication of Iranian Society of Pediatrics (ISP) and a peer-reviewed medical journal which is published quarterly. It is informative for all practicing pediatrics including general medical profession.
期刊最新文献
Social Anxiety in Students with Specific Learning Disorders Based on Emotion Regulation and Emotional Intelligence: The Mediating Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy Aortic Elasticity Changes in Children with Type I Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Controls Maternal Education is a Major Factor in Growth Regulation in Twins and Singletons Efficacy of N‑Acetylcysteine in Children with Moderate COVID-19: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Predictive Factors in Pediatric Henoch-Schönlein Purpura
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1