Anchoring tools to communities: insights into perceptions of flood informational tools from a flood-prone community in Louisiana, USA

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Frontiers in Water Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.3389/frwa.2023.1087076
E. Habib, B. Miles, L. Skilton, Mohamed Elsaadani, A. Osland, Emma Willis, Robert Miller, Trung Do, Stephen R. Barnes
{"title":"Anchoring tools to communities: insights into perceptions of flood informational tools from a flood-prone community in Louisiana, USA","authors":"E. Habib, B. Miles, L. Skilton, Mohamed Elsaadani, A. Osland, Emma Willis, Robert Miller, Trung Do, Stephen R. Barnes","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1087076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of community-relevant flood informational resources and tools often results in inadequate and divergent understandings of flood risk and can impede communities' ability to function cohesively in the face of increasing flood threats. The current study reports on a set of workshops that the authors conducted with various groups (citizens, city engineers and planners, realtors and builders, and media representatives) within a flood prone community to evaluate how novel hydroinformatic tools that include hydrodynamic modeling, geospatial visualization, and socioeconomic analysis can enhance understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation among diverse community members. The workshops were designed to help identify stakeholder preferences regarding key functionality needed for integrated hydroinformatic technologies and socioeconomic analyses for flood risk reduction. Workshop participants were asked to use and comment on examples of prototype flood risk informational tools, such as: (1) flood damage estimation tool, (2) drivability and emergency accessibility tool, and (3) community-scale social and economic metrics tool. Data gathered from workshops were analyzed using qualitative analysis based on a grounded-theory approach. Data were coded by hand based on themes identified by the research team and incorporated deviant case analysis to ensure minority opinions was represented. The study results are focused on the following main themes and how flood tools can address them: (1) improving the understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation, (2) reducing the gap between individual and community risk, (3) challenges in communicating flood risk information, (4) enhancing relevance to and engagement of the community, and (5) enabling actionable information. Our research demonstrates the need for community-anchored tools and technologies that can illustrate local context, include local historical and simulated events at multiple levels of community impact, enable analyses by flood professionals while also providing simplified tools of use by citizens, and allow individuals to expand their knowledge beyond their homes, businesses, and places of work.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1087076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of community-relevant flood informational resources and tools often results in inadequate and divergent understandings of flood risk and can impede communities' ability to function cohesively in the face of increasing flood threats. The current study reports on a set of workshops that the authors conducted with various groups (citizens, city engineers and planners, realtors and builders, and media representatives) within a flood prone community to evaluate how novel hydroinformatic tools that include hydrodynamic modeling, geospatial visualization, and socioeconomic analysis can enhance understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation among diverse community members. The workshops were designed to help identify stakeholder preferences regarding key functionality needed for integrated hydroinformatic technologies and socioeconomic analyses for flood risk reduction. Workshop participants were asked to use and comment on examples of prototype flood risk informational tools, such as: (1) flood damage estimation tool, (2) drivability and emergency accessibility tool, and (3) community-scale social and economic metrics tool. Data gathered from workshops were analyzed using qualitative analysis based on a grounded-theory approach. Data were coded by hand based on themes identified by the research team and incorporated deviant case analysis to ensure minority opinions was represented. The study results are focused on the following main themes and how flood tools can address them: (1) improving the understanding of flood risk and engagement in flood risk mitigation, (2) reducing the gap between individual and community risk, (3) challenges in communicating flood risk information, (4) enhancing relevance to and engagement of the community, and (5) enabling actionable information. Our research demonstrates the need for community-anchored tools and technologies that can illustrate local context, include local historical and simulated events at multiple levels of community impact, enable analyses by flood professionals while also providing simplified tools of use by citizens, and allow individuals to expand their knowledge beyond their homes, businesses, and places of work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锚定社区工具:美国路易斯安那州一个洪水易发社区对洪水信息工具的看法
缺乏与社区相关的洪水信息资源和工具往往导致对洪水风险的理解不足和分歧,并可能阻碍社区在面对日益严重的洪水威胁时团结一致地发挥作用。目前的研究报告了作者与洪水易发社区内的各个群体(公民、城市工程师和规划者、房地产经纪人和建筑商以及媒体代表)举办的一系列研讨会,以评估包括水动力学建模、地理空间可视化、,社会经济分析可以增强不同社区成员对洪水风险的理解和参与洪水风险缓解。研讨会旨在帮助确定利益相关者对综合水文信息技术和减少洪水风险的社会经济分析所需关键功能的偏好。研讨会参与者被要求使用原型洪水风险信息工具并对其进行评论,例如:(1)洪水损失估计工具,(2)可驾驶性和紧急可达性工具,以及(3)社区规模的社会和经济指标工具。从研讨会收集的数据采用基于扎根理论的定性分析方法进行分析。数据是根据研究团队确定的主题手工编码的,并纳入异常案例分析,以确保少数人的意见得到代表。研究结果集中在以下主要主题以及洪水工具如何应对这些主题:(1)提高对洪水风险的理解和参与洪水风险缓解,(2)缩小个人和社区风险之间的差距,(3)沟通洪水风险信息的挑战,(4)增强与社区的相关性和参与度,以及(5)使能可操作的信息。我们的研究表明,需要以社区为基础的工具和技术,这些工具和技术可以说明当地的背景,包括多个社区影响级别的当地历史和模拟事件,使洪水专业人员能够进行分析,同时也为公民提供简化的使用工具,并使个人能够将知识扩展到家庭、企业和工作场所之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
River-floodplain connectivity and residence times controlled by topographic bluffs along a backwater transition Rating curve development and uncertainty analysis in mountainous watersheds for informed hydrology and resource management Characterization of sewage quality and its spatiotemporal variations in a small town in Eastern Guangdong, China Model and remote-sensing-guided experimental design and hypothesis generation for monitoring snow-soil–plant interactions Precipitation fuels dissolved greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) dynamics in a peatland-dominated headwater stream: results from a continuous monitoring setup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1