Social shaping of mobile geomedia services: An analysis of Yelp and Foursquare

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication and the Public Pub Date : 2019-06-12 DOI:10.1177/2057047319850200
J. Frith, R. Wilken
{"title":"Social shaping of mobile geomedia services: An analysis of Yelp and Foursquare","authors":"J. Frith, R. Wilken","doi":"10.1177/2057047319850200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their book, Location-Based Social Media: Space, Time and Identity, Leighton Evans and Michael Saker remark on the apparent ‘death’ of location-based social networks, suggesting that location-based social networks can now be understood as ‘a form of “zombie-media” that animates and haunts other media platforms’. In this article, we use this perspective as a point of departure for a social shaping of technology-informed analysis of two key geomedia platforms: Yelp and Foursquare. With Yelp approaching its 15th year of service and Foursquare approaching its 10th anniversary, this article provides a timely opportunity to (re-)examine the significance of Yelp and Foursquare and the many reconfigurations both firms have made to their services since their launch. These include, most recently, Yelp’s integration of artificial intelligence/machine learning techniques to parse, sift and order users’ posts and Foursquare’s development of its Pilgrim SDK (software design kit) to power the location services of other platforms, like Tinder and Snap. A social shaping-inflected approach is productive in this context in that it stresses how many of these developments and strategic reorientations are not just in response to shareholder and investor pressures, they are also fundamentally shaped by and made in response to the fluctuating demands of end-users within a complicated, competitive and continuously evolving geomedia ecosystem. Consequently, we draw from the work of Leah A Lievrouw to examine how dual tensions of contingency/determination shape how these applications are designed and used, and how both design and use continue to evolve in response to various external pressures.","PeriodicalId":44233,"journal":{"name":"Communication and the Public","volume":"4 1","pages":"133 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2057047319850200","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and the Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319850200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In their book, Location-Based Social Media: Space, Time and Identity, Leighton Evans and Michael Saker remark on the apparent ‘death’ of location-based social networks, suggesting that location-based social networks can now be understood as ‘a form of “zombie-media” that animates and haunts other media platforms’. In this article, we use this perspective as a point of departure for a social shaping of technology-informed analysis of two key geomedia platforms: Yelp and Foursquare. With Yelp approaching its 15th year of service and Foursquare approaching its 10th anniversary, this article provides a timely opportunity to (re-)examine the significance of Yelp and Foursquare and the many reconfigurations both firms have made to their services since their launch. These include, most recently, Yelp’s integration of artificial intelligence/machine learning techniques to parse, sift and order users’ posts and Foursquare’s development of its Pilgrim SDK (software design kit) to power the location services of other platforms, like Tinder and Snap. A social shaping-inflected approach is productive in this context in that it stresses how many of these developments and strategic reorientations are not just in response to shareholder and investor pressures, they are also fundamentally shaped by and made in response to the fluctuating demands of end-users within a complicated, competitive and continuously evolving geomedia ecosystem. Consequently, we draw from the work of Leah A Lievrouw to examine how dual tensions of contingency/determination shape how these applications are designed and used, and how both design and use continue to evolve in response to various external pressures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动地理媒体服务的社会塑造——对Yelp和Foursquare的分析
在他们的书《基于位置的社交媒体:空间、时间和身份》中,Leighton Evans和Michael Saker评论了基于位置的社交网络的明显“死亡”,暗示基于位置的社交网络现在可以被理解为“一种‘僵尸媒体’,它激活并困扰着其他媒体平台”。在本文中,我们将这一视角作为两个关键几何平台Yelp和Foursquare的社会塑造技术分析的出发点。随着Yelp服务的15年和Foursquare服务的10周年,这篇文章提供了一个及时的机会来(重新)审视Yelp和Foursquare的重要性,以及两家公司自推出以来对其服务进行的许多重新配置。最近,Yelp整合了人工智能/机器学习技术来解析、筛选和排序用户的帖子,Foursquare开发了Pilgrim SDK(软件设计工具包),为Tinder和Snap等其他平台的位置服务提供支持。在这种情况下,影响社会形态的方法是富有成效的,因为它强调了这些发展和战略重新定位中有多少不仅仅是为了应对股东和投资者的压力,它们从根本上也是为了应对复杂、竞争和不断发展的几何生态系统中最终用户的波动需求而形成的。因此,我们借鉴Leah A Lievrouw的作品来研究偶然性/决定性的双重张力如何塑造这些应用程序的设计和使用方式,以及设计和使用如何在各种外部压力下继续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Populist politicians’ representations of the people: A comparative visual content analysis of candidates’ Instagram posts in 2023 Turkish general elections Women governors in the United States use more communal language than male governors in their State of the State addresses and tweets and achieve greater policy success Investigating the relationship between knowledge of the media industry and media trust in a government-owned and government-controlled media system Multimodality and appraisal choices in Nigerian coronavirus-related WhatsApp memes COVID-19 vaccines and vaccinations coverage on news portals: Framing, Tone, and Source Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1