Similarity-based interference and relative clauses in second language processing

IF 1.9 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Second Language Research Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1177/02676583211063534
Ian Cunnings, Hiroki Fujita
{"title":"Similarity-based interference and relative clauses in second language processing","authors":"Ian Cunnings, Hiroki Fujita","doi":"10.1177/02676583211063534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relative clauses have long been examined in research on first (L1) and second (L2) language acquisition and processing, and a large body of research has shown that object relative clauses (e.g. ‘The boy that the girl saw’) are more difficult to process than subject relative clauses (e.g. ‘The boy that saw the girl’). Although there are different accounts of this finding, memory-based factors have been argued to play a role in explaining the object relative disadvantage. Evidence of memory-based factors in relative clause processing comes from studies indicating that representational similarity influences the difficulty associated with object relatives as a result of a phenomenon known as similarity-based interference. Although similarity-based interference has been well studied in L1 processing, less is known about how it influences L2 processing. We report two studies – an eye-tracking experiment and a comprehension task – investigating interference in the comprehension of relative clauses in L1 and L2 readers. Our results indicated similarity-based interference in the processing of object relative clauses in both L1 and L2 readers, with no significant differences in the size of interference effects between the two groups. These results highlight the importance of considering memory-based factors when examining L2 processing.","PeriodicalId":47414,"journal":{"name":"Second Language Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"539 - 563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second Language Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211063534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Relative clauses have long been examined in research on first (L1) and second (L2) language acquisition and processing, and a large body of research has shown that object relative clauses (e.g. ‘The boy that the girl saw’) are more difficult to process than subject relative clauses (e.g. ‘The boy that saw the girl’). Although there are different accounts of this finding, memory-based factors have been argued to play a role in explaining the object relative disadvantage. Evidence of memory-based factors in relative clause processing comes from studies indicating that representational similarity influences the difficulty associated with object relatives as a result of a phenomenon known as similarity-based interference. Although similarity-based interference has been well studied in L1 processing, less is known about how it influences L2 processing. We report two studies – an eye-tracking experiment and a comprehension task – investigating interference in the comprehension of relative clauses in L1 and L2 readers. Our results indicated similarity-based interference in the processing of object relative clauses in both L1 and L2 readers, with no significant differences in the size of interference effects between the two groups. These results highlight the importance of considering memory-based factors when examining L2 processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二语加工中的相似干扰与关系从句
长期以来,有关第一(L1)和第二(L2)语言习得和加工的研究一直在研究关系从句,大量研究表明,宾语关系从句(如“女孩看到的男孩”)比主语关系从句(如“看到女孩的男孩”)更难处理。尽管对这一发现有不同的解释,但人们认为基于记忆的因素在解释物体相对劣势方面发挥了作用。基于记忆的因素在关系分句处理中的证据来自研究表明,表征相似性影响了与对象亲属相关的困难,这是一种被称为基于相似性的干扰现象。尽管基于相似性的干扰在第一语言加工中得到了很好的研究,但对它如何影响第二语言加工却知之甚少。我们报道了两项研究——眼动追踪实验和理解任务——调查了母语和二语读者对关系从句理解的干扰。我们的研究结果表明,母语和二语读者在处理宾语关系子句时都存在基于相似性的干扰,两组之间的干扰效应大小没有显著差异。这些结果强调了在检查第二语言处理时考虑基于记忆的因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Second Language Research is a high quality international peer reviewed journal, currently ranked in the top 20 journals in its field by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI). SLR publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with second language acquisition and second language performance, and adheres to a rigorous double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties.
期刊最新文献
Learning to predict: Second language perception of reduced multi-word sequences High is good enough: Gender agreement and relative clause attachment in L2 auditory processing Complex dynamic systems theory as a foundation for process-oriented research on second language development The relationship between L2 learners’ production and perception of English vowels: The role of native-speaker acoustic patterns in production The effect of second-language learning experience on Korean listeners’ use of pitch cues in the perception of Cantonese tones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1