Encouraging engineering undergraduates to voice their ideas worth sharing

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.4995/MUSE.2019.11370
A. García-Pinar
{"title":"Encouraging engineering undergraduates to voice their ideas worth sharing","authors":"A. García-Pinar","doi":"10.4995/MUSE.2019.11370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TED Talks have these days become a valuable tool for online information dissemination in a wide range of areas of expertise. The use of TED Talks in a course of Technical English offers numerous advantages. TED teaches how to communicate by linking different modes (i.e. the visual, gestural, verbal, written and spatial) to technological production. Students can construct communication when they attentively observe and make meaning from this ensemble of modes which go beyond the verbal. TED Talks might also give rise to different tasks that entail some type of critical multimodal analysis, by which students can study the aptness of modes. They can explore why the speaker says something visually and not verbally, or which mode is best for which purpose. Yet, TED and its zeal for sharing and transmitting ideas to a wide audience should not be regarded as a means incompatible with more traditional models of information. As Jewitt highlights (2005), rather than asking what is best, the book or the screen”, it seems more reasonable to ask “what is best for what purpose”.","PeriodicalId":52061,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/MUSE.2019.11370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

TED Talks have these days become a valuable tool for online information dissemination in a wide range of areas of expertise. The use of TED Talks in a course of Technical English offers numerous advantages. TED teaches how to communicate by linking different modes (i.e. the visual, gestural, verbal, written and spatial) to technological production. Students can construct communication when they attentively observe and make meaning from this ensemble of modes which go beyond the verbal. TED Talks might also give rise to different tasks that entail some type of critical multimodal analysis, by which students can study the aptness of modes. They can explore why the speaker says something visually and not verbally, or which mode is best for which purpose. Yet, TED and its zeal for sharing and transmitting ideas to a wide audience should not be regarded as a means incompatible with more traditional models of information. As Jewitt highlights (2005), rather than asking what is best, the book or the screen”, it seems more reasonable to ask “what is best for what purpose”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励工科本科生表达他们值得分享的想法
如今,TED演讲已经成为广泛专业领域在线信息传播的宝贵工具。在技术英语课程中使用TED演讲有很多优点。TED教授如何通过将不同的模式(即视觉、手势、言语、书面和空间)与技术生产联系起来进行交流。当学生专注于观察并从这些超越语言的模式中获得意义时,他们就能构建沟通。TED演讲也可能产生不同的任务,需要进行某种类型的批判性多模态分析,学生可以通过这些分析来研究模式的适用性。他们可以探索说话者为什么说的是视觉上的而不是口头上的,或者哪种模式最适合哪种目的。然而,TED及其向广大受众分享和传递思想的热情不应被视为与更传统的信息模式不兼容的手段。正如杰维特(2005)所强调的那样,与其问什么是最好的,书还是屏幕”,不如问“什么对什么目的最好”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Overview of Second Chance Schools in the Province of Malaga (Spain): A case Study Development and Validation of a Booklet in Educational Research: A Supplementary Material for Filipino Teacher Education Students Role of Higher Education to Adjust the Impulse Eating-Buying Behavior. A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis Analysis of the optimization of resources with Learning Analytics techniques Hackathon in Differentiated English for Specific Purposes Instruction of Information Technology Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1