{"title":"I “pericoli” della libertà religiosa al tempo della pandemia: un bilanciamento impossibile? Considerazioni comparate tra Italia e Francia","authors":"S. Gianello, P. Zicchittu","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/18826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SOMMARIO: 1. Le ragioni di una comparazione - 2. Il caso italiano: una breve cronistoria normativa - 3. Primi appunti giurisprudenziali per un corretto “bilanciamento” - 4. Verso un accomodamento ragionevole - 5. Il paradigma francese e l’opera di bilanciamento del Conseil d’État - 6. Alcune considerazioni in termini di bilanciamento fra libertà di culto e tutela della salute - 7. Minime notazioni di sistema a mo’ di conclusione. \nThe \"perils\" of religious freedom at the time of the pandemic: an impossible balance? Comparative remarks between Italy and France \nABSTRACT: The essay aims to analyze the measures adopted in the Italian and French legal systems to regulate the exercise of religious freedom during the Covid-19 emergency. The analysis is conducted by observing the various regulatory provisions in the light of the balancing test and the principles of proportionality and reasonableness. This way, the paper will try to verify the overall strength of the constitutional system in times of crisis and the protection of fundamental rights during an emergency.","PeriodicalId":30314,"journal":{"name":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/18826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SOMMARIO: 1. Le ragioni di una comparazione - 2. Il caso italiano: una breve cronistoria normativa - 3. Primi appunti giurisprudenziali per un corretto “bilanciamento” - 4. Verso un accomodamento ragionevole - 5. Il paradigma francese e l’opera di bilanciamento del Conseil d’État - 6. Alcune considerazioni in termini di bilanciamento fra libertà di culto e tutela della salute - 7. Minime notazioni di sistema a mo’ di conclusione.
The "perils" of religious freedom at the time of the pandemic: an impossible balance? Comparative remarks between Italy and France
ABSTRACT: The essay aims to analyze the measures adopted in the Italian and French legal systems to regulate the exercise of religious freedom during the Covid-19 emergency. The analysis is conducted by observing the various regulatory provisions in the light of the balancing test and the principles of proportionality and reasonableness. This way, the paper will try to verify the overall strength of the constitutional system in times of crisis and the protection of fundamental rights during an emergency.
索马利亚:1。拉吉奥尼是一个2。Il caso italiano:一个正常的短历史-3。根据“bilanciamento”-4的规定,首次申请。与第5条的规定相对应。法国歌剧院第六届理事会。最后,考虑到了对宗教自由和宗教教育的尊重——7。这是一个非常重要的结论。疫情期间宗教自由的“危险”:一种不可能的平衡?意大利与法国的比较摘要:本文旨在分析意大利和法国在新冠肺炎紧急情况下为规范宗教自由的行使而采取的法律措施。分析是根据平衡测试以及比例和合理性原则,遵守各项监管规定进行的。通过这种方式,本文将试图验证宪法制度在危机时期的整体实力以及在紧急情况下对基本权利的保护。