Mobile Learning in University Contexts Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

IF 4.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research Pub Date : 2019-01-15 DOI:10.7821/NAER.2019.1.317
Ángel Mojarro Aliaño, A. D. Hueros, M. G. Franco, Ignacio Aguaded
{"title":"Mobile Learning in University Contexts Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)","authors":"Ángel Mojarro Aliaño, A. D. Hueros, M. G. Franco, Ignacio Aguaded","doi":"10.7821/NAER.2019.1.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to determine the factors that significantly influence the acceptance and intent to use smartphones and tables as resources for learning in university contexts, as well as the relationships established between them. For their analysis, we followed a contextualized model of evaluation starting with the methodological framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), proposed by Venkatesh and collaborators (2003). For this, a data collection instrument was designed, validated to our context and optimized for mobile learning and the education community. A total of 370 university students participated in the study. From the statistical analysis conducted, it was shown that the instrument constructed had a notable internal consistency, showing a high validity for collecting information in relation to five of the eight factors of which it was composed, although it should be revised in relation to the other three. Also, through the data collected, a high pre-disposition was observed for the use of mobile devices for learning, with a direct effect on the constructs validated, as well as the socio-demographic variables (age, gender, degree year and field of knowledge) that could be considered moderating variables of this pre-disposition. Although these results could be put into context in future studies, it can be concluded that the instrument design can be a good indicator of the pre-disposition towards the use of mobile learning strategies.","PeriodicalId":51833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2019.1.317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the factors that significantly influence the acceptance and intent to use smartphones and tables as resources for learning in university contexts, as well as the relationships established between them. For their analysis, we followed a contextualized model of evaluation starting with the methodological framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), proposed by Venkatesh and collaborators (2003). For this, a data collection instrument was designed, validated to our context and optimized for mobile learning and the education community. A total of 370 university students participated in the study. From the statistical analysis conducted, it was shown that the instrument constructed had a notable internal consistency, showing a high validity for collecting information in relation to five of the eight factors of which it was composed, although it should be revised in relation to the other three. Also, through the data collected, a high pre-disposition was observed for the use of mobile devices for learning, with a direct effect on the constructs validated, as well as the socio-demographic variables (age, gender, degree year and field of knowledge) that could be considered moderating variables of this pre-disposition. Although these results could be put into context in future studies, it can be concluded that the instrument design can be a good indicator of the pre-disposition towards the use of mobile learning strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)的大学情境移动学习
本研究的目的是确定显著影响在大学环境中使用智能手机和桌子作为学习资源的接受和意图的因素,以及它们之间建立的关系。在他们的分析中,我们遵循了一个情境化的评估模型,从Venkatesh及其合作者(2003年)提出的技术接受和使用统一理论(UTAUT)的方法框架开始。为此,我们设计了一个数据收集工具,根据我们的情况进行了验证,并针对移动学习和教育社区进行了优化。共有370名大学生参与了这项研究。从进行的统计分析中可以看出,构建的工具具有显着的内部一致性,显示出与它组成的八个因素中的五个相关的信息收集的高有效性,尽管它应该针对其他三个进行修订。此外,通过收集的数据,观察到使用移动设备进行学习的高倾向,对验证的构念以及社会人口变量(年龄,性别,学位年份和知识领域)有直接影响,这些变量可以被认为是这种倾向的调节变量。虽然这些结果可以在未来的研究中纳入背景,但可以得出的结论是,仪器设计可以很好地指示对使用移动学习策略的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: NAER seeks academic articles on educational sciences based on innovative experiences which can contribute the development of the educational sciences in any of their manifestations and provide new approaches to teaching as a response to the deep changes our society is going through.
期刊最新文献
Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists. Violence and the Right to Education in the Northern Triangle of Central America The 'Birth of Doubt' and 'The Existence of Other Possibilities': Exploring How the ACAD Toolkit Supports Design for Learning Suicidal Ideation in Undergraduate Students of Social Work: A Quantitative Study Moving Learning: A Systematic Review of Mobile Learning Applications for Online Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1