Adoption potentials and barriers of silvopastoral system in Colombia: Case of Cundinamarca region

Q2 Environmental Science Cogent Environmental Science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23311843.2020.1823632
Seonhwa Lee, M. Bonatti, K. Löhr, Vandreé Palacios, M. Lana, S. Sieber
{"title":"Adoption potentials and barriers of silvopastoral system in Colombia: Case of Cundinamarca region","authors":"Seonhwa Lee, M. Bonatti, K. Löhr, Vandreé Palacios, M. Lana, S. Sieber","doi":"10.1080/23311843.2020.1823632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Silvopastoral system (SPS) is highlighted as an alternative to conventional cattle farming systems in Colombia, where deforestation, driven by extensive cattle farming, is a severe environmental issue. However, despite its considerable benefits, adoption of SPS remains very limited in Colombia. Thus, the objective of this work is to investigate the potential for scaling up the adoption of SPS by identifying the barriers perceived by farmers, using a case study of tropical land at a high altitude over 2400 m in Cundinamarca department, Colombia. Qualitative research methodology is used in accordance with the conceptual framework constructed on the basis of adoption theories and literature reviews. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 27 farmers managing cattle farming. The results show that while farmers perceive numerous benefits of SPS, it is perceived as highly risky due to climate conditions. Additionally, concerns about long-term investments necessary to obtain benefits from SPS as well as its high complexity are discouraging. Furthermore, low compatibility due to the socio-economic barriers and traditional belief regarding trees in pasture are also verified as an external barrier for adopting SPS practices. In this context, the enabling conditions for scaling-up SPS adoption in the study area are discussed: strengthening farmers’ motivation with provision of long-term extension services and transforming the conventional concept of tree removal as well as the appropriate project designs given farmers’ socio-economic conditions and the adequate selection of tree species.","PeriodicalId":45615,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23311843.2020.1823632","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1823632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Silvopastoral system (SPS) is highlighted as an alternative to conventional cattle farming systems in Colombia, where deforestation, driven by extensive cattle farming, is a severe environmental issue. However, despite its considerable benefits, adoption of SPS remains very limited in Colombia. Thus, the objective of this work is to investigate the potential for scaling up the adoption of SPS by identifying the barriers perceived by farmers, using a case study of tropical land at a high altitude over 2400 m in Cundinamarca department, Colombia. Qualitative research methodology is used in accordance with the conceptual framework constructed on the basis of adoption theories and literature reviews. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 27 farmers managing cattle farming. The results show that while farmers perceive numerous benefits of SPS, it is perceived as highly risky due to climate conditions. Additionally, concerns about long-term investments necessary to obtain benefits from SPS as well as its high complexity are discouraging. Furthermore, low compatibility due to the socio-economic barriers and traditional belief regarding trees in pasture are also verified as an external barrier for adopting SPS practices. In this context, the enabling conditions for scaling-up SPS adoption in the study area are discussed: strengthening farmers’ motivation with provision of long-term extension services and transforming the conventional concept of tree removal as well as the appropriate project designs given farmers’ socio-economic conditions and the adequate selection of tree species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚森林放牧系统的采用潜力和障碍:以Cundinamarca地区为例
在哥伦比亚,森林放牧系统(SPS)被强调为传统畜牧业系统的替代方案,在那里,由广泛的养牛业驱动的森林砍伐是一个严重的环境问题。然而,尽管SPS有相当大的好处,但在哥伦比亚的采用仍然非常有限。因此,本工作的目的是通过对哥伦比亚Cundinamarca省2400米以上高海拔热带土地的案例研究,确定农民认为的障碍,调查扩大SPS采用的潜力。定性研究方法是根据收养理论和文献综述所构建的概念框架来使用的。数据是通过对27名养牛农民的半结构化访谈收集的。结果表明,虽然农民认为SPS有很多好处,但由于气候条件,它被认为是高风险的。此外,对从SPS中获得利益所需的长期投资以及其高度复杂性的担忧令人沮丧。此外,由于社会经济障碍和对牧场树木的传统信仰造成的低兼容性也被证实是采用SPS实践的外部障碍。在此背景下,本文讨论了在研究地区扩大采用SPS的有利条件:通过提供长期推广服务来加强农民的动机,改变传统的砍伐树木的概念,以及根据农民的社会经济条件和充分选择树种进行适当的项目设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cogent Environmental Science
Cogent Environmental Science ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of spirotetramat and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic pesticides on two phytoplankton species (Monoraphidium griffithii and Coscinodiscus sp.) in a single and compound mixture laboratory exposure Analysing the challenges in implementing Vietnam’s Nationally-Determined Contribution (NDC) in the agriculture sector under the current legal, regulatory and policy environment Assessing spatial patterns of forest degradation in dry Miombo woodland in Southern Tanzania Dioxins in peat and its formation: An overview South Korea’s big move to hydrogen society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1