The Effectiveness of Administrative Detention of Migrants in Relation to Return Rates: A Compared Analysis along States of EU South Frontier: Italy, France, Greece and Spain as Cases Study

Q2 Social Sciences Global Jurist Pub Date : 2020-08-27 DOI:10.1515/gj-2020-0028
Luca Falsone
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Administrative Detention of Migrants in Relation to Return Rates: A Compared Analysis along States of EU South Frontier: Italy, France, Greece and Spain as Cases Study","authors":"Luca Falsone","doi":"10.1515/gj-2020-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Administrative detention has gradually become a fundamental instrument in migration policies of European States. The law generally assigns to this measure a key role in supporting removal procedure. On the other hand, administrative detention has been recognised as a symptom of the crimmigration crisis. This article aims to challenge the expected benefits of administrative detention as an effective measure to guarantee the enforcement of removal procedures, analysing available data of imprisonments and removals relative to Italy, France, Spain and Greece in the period of time 2014–2019.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":"21 1","pages":"143 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/gj-2020-0028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2020-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Administrative detention has gradually become a fundamental instrument in migration policies of European States. The law generally assigns to this measure a key role in supporting removal procedure. On the other hand, administrative detention has been recognised as a symptom of the crimmigration crisis. This article aims to challenge the expected benefits of administrative detention as an effective measure to guarantee the enforcement of removal procedures, analysing available data of imprisonments and removals relative to Italy, France, Spain and Greece in the period of time 2014–2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民行政拘留的有效性与返回率的关系:欧盟南部边境国家的比较分析——以意大利、法国、希腊和西班牙为例
行政拘留已逐渐成为欧洲各国移民政策的一项基本手段。法律一般赋予这一措施在支持撤职程序方面的关键作用。另一方面,行政拘留已被认为是犯罪-移民危机的一个症状。本文旨在质疑行政拘留作为保障遣返程序执行的有效措施的预期好处,分析2014-2019年期间意大利、法国、西班牙和希腊有关监禁和遣返的现有数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Jurist
Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.
期刊最新文献
‘The Food Must Reach the Hungry’: Lessons from Judicial Enforcement of Right to Food in India On the History of Water as a Human Right and Its Recognition in the Cuban Constitution Capitalising on Uncertainty: Exploring the Failure of International Law to Address the Risk Generated by the Proliferation of Space Debris Two Tales of the Energy Commons Through the Lens of Complexity Achieving a Common Future for all Through Sustainability-Conscious Legal Education and Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1