Gamifying Gamification in the Sociology Classroom

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Sociology Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1177/0092055x231175176
Brandon Folse, Frederick J. Poole
{"title":"Gamifying Gamification in the Sociology Classroom","authors":"Brandon Folse, Frederick J. Poole","doi":"10.1177/0092055x231175176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing ubiquity of gamification in everyday life normalizes it as a motivational tool. While much scholarship supports gamification, labor sociologists have long problematized the phenomenon. In this mixed-methods action research study, we explore the results of gamifying a lesson on gamification in a sociology of work course. We designed two gamified activities with varying degrees of consent that followed a lesson on gamification and consent. Students rated how problematic a series of gamified work scenarios were before and after the intervention. Our quantitative data did not show a significant increase in students’ ability to identify consent after the intervention, but we did discover that students took either an employee or employer’s perspective in their rating justifications. Furthermore, these findings were gendered. This article highlights the need for a more critical take on gamification in the classroom. We conclude by suggesting ways practitioners can teach about gamification in other contexts.","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x231175176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The increasing ubiquity of gamification in everyday life normalizes it as a motivational tool. While much scholarship supports gamification, labor sociologists have long problematized the phenomenon. In this mixed-methods action research study, we explore the results of gamifying a lesson on gamification in a sociology of work course. We designed two gamified activities with varying degrees of consent that followed a lesson on gamification and consent. Students rated how problematic a series of gamified work scenarios were before and after the intervention. Our quantitative data did not show a significant increase in students’ ability to identify consent after the intervention, but we did discover that students took either an employee or employer’s perspective in their rating justifications. Furthermore, these findings were gendered. This article highlights the need for a more critical take on gamification in the classroom. We conclude by suggesting ways practitioners can teach about gamification in other contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会学课堂中的游戏化
游戏化在日常生活中日益普遍,使其成为一种激励工具。虽然许多学术界支持游戏化,但劳动社会学家长期以来一直对这一现象持怀疑态度。在这项混合方法的行动研究中,我们在工作社会学课程中探讨了游戏化的结果。我们设计了两个不同程度同意的游戏化活动,这是在游戏化和同意的课程之后进行的。学生们评估了干预前后一系列游戏化工作场景的问题程度。我们的定量数据没有显示干预后学生识别同意的能力显著提高,但我们确实发现,学生在评级理由中要么从员工的角度,要么从雇主的角度。此外,这些发现是性别化的。这篇文章强调了在课堂上对游戏化进行更批判性思考的必要性。最后,我们建议从业者在其他环境中教授游戏化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
期刊最新文献
Using the visual cliff and pole descent assays to detect binocular disruption in mice. Book Review: Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions Film Review: Hot Coffee: Is Justice Being Served? Book Review: Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope Film Review: Aftershock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1